Although it is relatively common for some practitioners to assess psychopathic personality disturbance (PPD) among adolescent offenders, little has been said about interview skills and strategies that are helpful for an accurate assessment. Thus, this article provided recommendations for improving interview protocols for the assessment of PPD among incarcerated adolescent offenders. These recommendations were based on experiences interviewing adolescents from the Incarcerated Serious and Violent Young Offender Study and related to: (1) establishing and improving rapport, (2) responding to dishonesty, (3) tailoring the interview for adolescents as opposed to adults, (4) the importance of follow-up questions, and (5) recognizing and responding to symptoms of PPD that emerge during the interview. Vignettes of interviews with incarcerated adolescent males were used to help illustrate recommendations and strategies. Future research should systematically measure what works and what does not work when implementing interview strategies, including whether such strategies generalize across gender and culture.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramK. M.TeplinL. A.McClellandG. M.DulcanM. K. (2003). Comorbid psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(11), 1097–1108.
2.
ArgyleM.CookM. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BaglivioM. T.WolffK. T.PiqueroA. R.EppsN. (2015). The relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and juvenile offending trajectories in a juvenile offender sample. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(3), 229–241.
4.
BookA. S.HoldenR. R.StarzykK. B.WasylkiwL.EdwardsM. J. (2006). Psychopathic traits and experimental induced deception in self report assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4), 601–608.
5.
CauffmanE.SteinbergL. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences the Law, 18(6), 741–760.
6.
CookeD. J.HartS. D.LoganC.MichieC. (2004). Comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality—institutional rating scale (CAPP-IRS). Glasgow, UK: Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University.
7.
CookeD. J.HartS. D.LoganC.MichieC. (2012). Explicating the construct of psychopathy: Development and validation of a conceptual model, the comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality (CAPP). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(4), 242–252.
8.
CookeD. J.LoganC. (2018). Capturing psychopathic personality: Penetrating the mask of sanity through clinical interview. In. PatrickC. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford Press.
9.
CreweB. (2011). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455–468.
10.
EdensJ. F.SkeemJ. L.CruiseK. R.CauffmanE. (2001). Assessment of juvenile psychopathy and its association with violence: A critical review. Behavioral Sciences the Law, 19(1), 53–80.
11.
EdensJ. F.VincentG. M. (2008). Juvenile psychopathy: A clinical construct in need of restraint?Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8, 186–197.
12.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
13.
ForouzanE.CookeD. J. (2005). Figuring out la femme fatale: Conceptual and assessment issues concerning psychopathy in females. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 765–778.
14.
ForthA. E.KossonD. S.HareR. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist: Youth version. New York: Multi-Health Systems.
15.
GaconoC. B. (2000). Suggestions for implementation and use of the psychopathy checklists in forensic and clinical practice. In GaconoC.B. (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 175–202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
HartS. D. (2016). Culture and violence risk assessment: The case of Ewert v. Canada. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(2), 76–96.
17.
HarterS. (1990). Self and identity development. In FeldmanS.S.ElliottG.R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 352–387). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
HartS. D.WattK. A.VincentG. M. (2002). Commentary on Seagrave and Grisso: Impressions of the state of the art. Law and Human Behavior, 26(2), 241–245.
19.
HillJ.HolmbeckG. (1986). Attachment and autonomy during adolescence. In WhitehurstG. (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 3, pp. 145–189). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
KeatingD. (1990). Adolescent thinking. In FeldmanS.ElliottG. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 54–89). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
KossonD. S.GaconoC. B.KlipfelK. M.BodholdtR. (2016). Understanding and assessing psychopathy. In GaconoC.B. (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner's guide (2nd ed.), (pp. 252–275). New York: Routledge.
22.
LilienfeldS. O.FowlerK. A. (2006). The self-report assessment of psychopathy: Problems, pitfalls, and promises. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 107–132). New York: Guilford Press.
23.
LoganC. (2013). Risk assessment: Specialist interviewing skills for forensic practitioners. In LoganC.JohnstoneL. (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
24.
McCuishE.LussierP.CorradoR. (2018). Incarceration as a turning point? The impact of custody experiences and identity change on community reentry. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology (online first), 1–22.
25.
MeloyJ. R. (2005). The forensic interview. In CraigR.J. (Ed.), Clinical and diagnostic interviewing (pp. 323–344). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.
26.
MitchellM. M.FahmyC.PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H. (2017). Criminal crews, codes, and contexts: differences and similarities across the code of the street, convict code, street gangs, and prison gangs. Deviant Behavior, 38(10), 1197–1222.
27.
MonahanK. C.SteinbergL.CauffmanE.MulveyE. P. (2009). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1654–1668.
28.
PiagetJ. (1972). The child’s conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.
29.
QuinnM. M.RutherfordR. B.LeoneP. E.OsherD. M.PoirierJ. M. (2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 339–345.
30.
RichardsonG.GudjonssonG. H.KellyT. P. (1995). Interrogative suggestibility in an adolescent forensic population. Journal of Adolescence, 18(2), 211–216.
31.
RogersR.CruiseK. R. (2000). Malingering and deception among psychopaths. In GaconoC.B. (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
SeagraveD.GrissoT. (2002). Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior, 26(2), 219–239.
33.
SelmanR. (1980). The Growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic.
34.
ShepherdE. (2007). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
ShepherdE.GriffithsA. (2013). Investigative interviewing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
SkeemJ. L.CauffmanE. (2003). Views of the downward extension: Comparing the youth version of the psychopathy checklist with the youth psychopathic traits inventory. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(6), 737–770.
37.
SteinbergL.MorrisA. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.
38.
VrijA.AkehurstL.BrownL.MannS. (2006). Detecting lies in young children, adolescents and adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 20, 1225–1237.
39.
YangJ.McCuishE. C.CorradoR. R. (2017). Foster care beyond placement: Offending outcomes in emerging adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 53, 46–54.
40.
ZulawskiD. E.WicklanderD. E. (1993). Practical aspects of interview and interrogation. New York: Elsevier.
