This article discusses issues arising when interviewing men and women in forensic mental health services, noting that many patients in these settings have significant histories of aggression or violence. The differences between interviews conducted for assessment purposes and those that are conducted as part of treatment are noted. We identify some important considerations for interviewers. These relate to characteristics of the client, characteristics of the interviewer, and features of the mental health setting that might impact on the interview. Some practical recommendations are offered to assist forensic mental health practitioners who conduct both types of interview.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (2013). Speciality guidelines for forensic practice. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. doi: 10.1037/a0029889
2.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2002). “Human aggression.”Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27–51.
3.
BarberJ. G. (1991). Beyond Casework. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BachelorA.MeunierG.LaverdiéreO.GamacheD. (2010). Client attachment to therapist: Relation to client personality and symptomatology, and their contributions to the therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy:Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47(4), 454–468.
5.
BlackburnR.CoidJ. W. (1999). Empirical clusters of DSM-III personality disorders in violent offenders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 13(1), 18–34.
6.
BlackburnR.RenwickS. J. (1996). Rating scales for measuring the interpersonal circle in forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 8(1), 76–84.
7.
BurrellS. (2013). Trauma and the Environment of Care in Juvenile Institutions. Los Angeles, CA & Durham, NC: National Center for Child Traumatic Stress.
8.
BordinE. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252–260.
ClarkeM.FardoulyP.McMurranM. (2013). A survey of how clinicians in forensic personality disorder services engage their service users in treatment. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 24(6), 772–788. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2013.862292
11.
DaffernM.DugganC.HubandN.ThomasS. D. M. (2008). The impact of interpersonal style on aggression and treatment non-completion in patients with personality disorder admitted to a medium secure psychiatric unit. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14(6), 481–492.
12.
DaffernM.DugganC.HubandN.ThomasS. D. M. (2010). Staff and patient’s perceptions of each others’ interpersonal style: Relationship with severity of personality disorder. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(4), 611–624.
13.
DaffernM.HowellsK.OgloffJ. R. P (2007). What’s the point? Towards a methodology for assessing the function of psychiatric inpatient aggression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(1), 101–111.
14.
DayA. (2014). Competing ethical paradigms in forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology: Commentary for a special section of Legal and Criminological Psychology. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(1), 16–18.
15.
DayA.KozarC.DaveyL. (2013). Treatment approaches and offending behavior programs: Some critical issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 630–635.
16.
DolanM.BlackburnR. (2006). Interpersonal factors as predictors of disciplinary infractions in incarcerated personality disordered offenders. International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, 40(5), 897–907.
17.
DowdenC.AndrewsD. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203–214. doi: 10.1177/0306624X0325776
18.
DoyleM.DolanM. (2006). Evaluating the validity of anger regulation problems, interpersonal style, and disturbed mental state for predicting inpatient violence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24(6), 783–798.
19.
DraycottS.AskariR.KirkpatrickT. (2011). Patterns and changes in psychopathic interpersonal behaviour in forensic inpatient treatment. Personality and Mental Health, 5(3), 200–208. doi: 10.1002/pmh.171
20.
DugganC. (2008). Focusing on treatment: The main interventions and their implications. In SoothillK.RogersP.DolanM. (Eds.). Handbook of Forensic Mental Health (pp. 505–524). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
21.
ElliottW. (2006). Power and control tactics employed by prison inmates: A case study. Federal Probation, 70, 45–48.
22.
FallerK. C. (2014). Forty years of forensic interviewing of children suspected of sexual abuse, 1974–2014: Historical Benchmarks. Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 34–65. doi: 10.3390/socsci4010034
23.
GreenbergS. A.ShumanD. W. (2007). When worlds collide: Therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(2), 129–132. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.38.2.129.
24.
GutheilT. G. (2005). Boundary issues and personality disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 11(2), 88–96.
25.
HM Inspectorate of Probation. (2006). An Independent Review of a Serious Further Offence Case: Anthony Rice. London, UK: Home Office.
26.
HodginsS.Müller-IsbernerR. (2004). Preventing crime by people with schizophrenic disorders: the role of psychiatric services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185(03), 245–250.
27.
HowellsK.DayA. (2003). Readiness for anger management: Clinical and theoretical issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(2), 319–337.
28.
HunsleyJ.MashE. J. (Eds.). (2008). A guide to assessments that work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
JonesM.OwenC.TarantelloC.TennantC. (1998). Violence and aggression in psychiatric units. Psychiatric Services, 49(11), 1452–1457.
30.
KieslerD. J. (1987). Manual for the Impact Message Inventory. San Diego, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
31.
KieslerD. J.AuerbachS. M. (2003). Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician-patient interaction: The interpersonal circumplex. Social Science and Medicine, 57(9), 1707–1722.
32.
KohutH. (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
33.
KozarC. (2010). Treatment readiness and the therapeutic alliance. In DayA.CaseyS.WardT.HowellsK.VessJ. (Eds.), Transitions to better lives: Offender readiness and rehabilitation (pp. 195–213). Cullompton, UK: Willan Press.
34.
KozarC. J.DayA. (2012). The therapeutic alliance in offending behavior programs: A necessary and sufficient condition for change?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 482–487. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.07.004
35.
KozarC. J.DayA. (2017). The therapeutic alliance in offending behavior change programs: therapist perspectives and practises. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 9(3), 210–219. doi: 10.1108/JACPR-08-2016-0245
36.
KucharskiL. T.ToomeyJ. P.FilaK.DuncanS. (2007). Detection of malingering of psychiatric disorder with the personality assessment inventory: An investigation of criminal defendants. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(1), 25–32.
37.
LinehanM. M. (1997). Validation and psychotherapy. In BohurtA.GreenbergL. (Eds.), Empathy Reconsidered: New Directions in Psychotherapy (pp. 353–392).Washington, DC: APA.
38.
MaguireT.DaffernM.BoweS.McKennaB. (2017). Predicting aggressive behaviour in acute forensic mental health units: a re-examination of the dynamic appraisal of situational aggression’s predictive validity. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 26(5), 472–481.
39.
MarshallW. L.SerranG. A. (2004). The role of the therapist in offender treatment. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10(3), 309–320.
40.
McDermottD. (2008, September). Deep listening: Working with Indigenous mental distress. Workshop on Social and Cultural Transitions, Northern Territory.
41.
McKillopN.BrownS. J.SmallboneS.WortleyR. (2016). Sexual offenders’ parental and adult attachments and preferences for therapists’ interpersonal qualities. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 22(2), 177–191. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2015.1057243
42.
McMurranM.DelightS. (2017). Processes of change in an offender personality disorder pathway prison progression unit. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 27(3), 254–264. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2032
43.
MullenJ. M.ReinehrR. C. (1982). Predicting dangerousness of maximum security forensic mental patients. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 10(2), 223–231.
44.
MullenP. (2000). Forensic mental health. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176(04), 307–311. doi: 10.1192/bjp.176.4.307; PMid:10827876
45.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2009). Antisocial personality disorder: Prevention and management. London, UK: NICE.
46.
PadfieldM.ProcterI. (1996). The impact of interviewer's gender on the interviewing process: A comparative enquiry. Sociology, 30(2), 355–366.
47.
PodubinskiT.LeeS.HollanderY.DaffernM. (2015). Evaluating the relationship between interpersonal hostile-dominance and childhood abuse and neglect. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(9), 986–1001.
48.
PodubinskiT.LeeS.HollanderY.DaffernM. (2017). State and trait predictors of inpatient aggressive behaviour: Psychiatric symptoms, aggression-related cognitive and affective characteristics, interpersonal style and psychopathy. Psychiatry Research, 250, 141–145.
49.
RossE. C.PolaschekD. L. L.WardT. (2008). The therapeutic alliance: A theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 462–480. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.003
50.
SerranG.FernandezY.MarshallW. L.MannR. E. (2003). Process issues in treatment: Application to sexual offender programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(4), 368–374. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.34
51.
SkeemJ. L.LoudenJ. E.PolaschekD.CampJ. (2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
52.
TjeltveitA. C. (1999). Ethics and Values in Psychotherapy. Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
53.
WatsonJ. C.GoldmanR.VanaerschotG. (1998). Empathic:A post-modern way of being. In GreenbergL. S.WatsonJ.LietaerG. (Eds.), Handbook of Experiential Psychotherapy (pp. 61–81). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
54.
WatsonR.DaffernM.ThomasS. (2017). The impact of interpersonal style and interpersonal complementarity on the therapeutic alliance between therapists and offenders in sex offender treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29(2), 107–127. doi: 10.1177/1079063215580969
55.
WigginsJ. S.PincusA. L. (2002). Personality structure and the structure of personality disorder. In CostaP. T.WidigerT. A. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-factor Model of Personality (2nd ed., pp. 103–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
