Response to “The Use of Meta-Analysis to Compare and Select Offender Risk Instruments”

Fazel S., Bjorkly S. (2016). Methodological considerations in risk assessment research In Singh S. Bjorkly S. Fazel S. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Violence Risk Assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Fazel S. Chang Z. Fanshawe T. Långström N. Lichtenstein P. Larsson H., Mallett S. (2016). Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool. Lancet Psychiatry, 3(6), 535–543. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00103-6

Fazel S. Singh J. P. Doll H., Grann M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 345, e4692.

Mallett S. Halligan S. Thompson M. Collins G. S., Altman D. G. (2012). Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 345, e3999.

Pepe M. S. Kerr K. F. Longton G., Wang Z. (2013). Testing for improvement in prediction model performance. Statistics in Medicine, 32(9), 1467–1482.

Singh J. P. Grann M., Fazel S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499–513.

Singh J. P. Grann M., Fazel S. (2013). Authorship bias in violence risk assessment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e72484. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072484

Yang M. Wong S. C., Coid J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767.