Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This rapid review summarises the currently available information on how best to engage users of forensic mental health services in the research process. A search of six electronic databases and a general Internet search identified eleven peer-reviewed journal papers and twelve reports, the majority containing information derived using qualitative methods. Five areas of particular relevance to forensic settings were identified: power relations & vulnerability issues (including ethical treatment; informed consent; attitudes of staff and other service users); practical difficulties; confidentiality and transparency; language and communication and training issues. Recommendations on engaging service users in forensic mental health research are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banongo

Davies

Godin

Thompson

Lohneis

Denys

Simpson

(2006). Engaging service users in the evaluation and development of forensic mental health care services. London, UK: City University/National Programme for Forensic Mental Health R&D.

Bates

(2010). Thinking about professional boundaries in an inclusive society. In P. Gilbert (Ed.), Social work and mental health: The value of everything (pp. 18–24). Lyme Regis, UK: Russell House.

Bates

(2014). How to involve the public as co-authors. East Midlands Academic Health Science Network. Retrieved April 28, 2015 from http://emahsn.org.uk/images/resource-hub/PPI%20documents/How%20to%20guidance/How_to_involve_people_as_co-authors.pdf

Brett

Staniszewska

Mockford

Herron-Marx

Hughes

Tysall

Suleman

(2012). Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expectations, 17, 637–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x

Byrne

M. W.

(2005). Conducting research as a visiting scientist in a women's prison. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(4), 223—30. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.05.001

Callard

Rose

(2012). The mental health strategy for Europe: why service user leadership in research is indispensable. Journal of Mental Health, 21(3), 219–126. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.651661.

Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care [CLAHRC] (2014). East Midlands Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: Public Involvement Programme. Retrieved February 7, 2015 from http://www.clahrc-em.nihr.ac.uk/clahrc-em-nihr/public-involvement/index.aspx

CLINKS (2011). A review of service user involvement in prisons and probation trusts. London, UK: Clinks. Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://www.clinks.org/criminal-justice/service-user-involvement

CLINKS (2013). Service user involvement: A volunteering and mentoring guide. Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://www.revolving-doors.org.uk/documents/service-user-involvement-guide/

10.

Davidson

K. M.

Espie

C. J.

Lammie

(2011). Conducting randomised controlled trials: finding better ways to explain research to people with anti-social personality disorder who have low literacy levels. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 21(4), 265–278. doi:10.1002/cbm.811

11.

Department of Health (2001). Research governance framework for health and social care. London, UK: Department of Health.

12.

European Parliament (2009). The European Parliament Resolution on Mental Health. Retrieved April 12, 2015 from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A6-2009-0034+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN

13.

Faulkner

Morris

(2003). Expert paper: User involvement in forensic mental health research and development. Liverpool, UK: National R&D Programme on Forensic Mental Health.

14.

Faulkner

(2004). The ethics of survivor research: Guidelines for the ethical conduct of research carried out by mental health service user and survivors. Bristol, UK: Policy Press on behalf of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

15.

Faulkner

(2007). Beyond our expectation: A report of the experiences of involving service-users in forensic mental health research. Liverpool, UK: NHS National Programme on Forensic Mental Health Research and Development.

16.

Godin

Davies

Heyman

Reynolds

Simpson

Floyd

(2007). Opening communicative space: A Habermasian understanding of a user led participatory research project. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 18(4), 452–469. doi:10.1080/14789940701470283

17.

Hanley

Bradburn

Barnes

Evans

Goodare

Kelson

…Wallcraft

(2004). Involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research: Briefing notes for researchers. Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE Support Unit.

18.

INVOLVE (2009). Exploring impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, UK: Author.

19.

INVOLVE (2012a). Recruiting members of the public to get involved in research funding and commissioning processes. London, UK: INVOLVE-NIHR.

20.

INVOLVE (2012b). Briefing notes for researchers: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Retrieved June 2, 2016 from http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/9938_INVOLVE_Briefing_Notes_WEB.pdf

21.

Khangura

Konnyu

Cushman

Grimshaw

Moher

(2012). Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Systematic Reviews, 1, 10. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10

22.

Lal

Adair

C.E.

(2014). E-Mental Health: A rapid review of the literature. Psychiatric Services, 65(1), 24–32. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300009

23.

Livingston

J. D

Nijdam-Jones

Team

P.E.E.R.

(2013a). Perceptions of treatment planning in a forensic mental health hospital: A qualitative, participatory action research study. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12(1), 42–52. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2013.763390

24.

Livingston

J. D.

Nijdam-Jones

Lapsley

Calderwood

Brink

(2013b). Supporting Recovery by Improving Patient Engagement in a Forensic Mental Health Hospital: Results from a Demonstration Project. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 19(3), 132–145. doi: 10.1177/1078390313489730

25.

MacInnes

Beer

Keeble

Rees

Reid

(2011). Service-user involvement in forensic mental health care research: Areas to consider when developing a collaborative study. Journal of Mental Health, 20(5), 464–472. doi:10.3109/09638231003728109

26.

Martin

Murphy

Hanson

Hemingway

Ramsden

Buxton

…Hislop

TG.

(2009). The development of participatory health research among incarcerated women in a Canadian prison. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 5(2), 95–107. doi: 10.1080/17449200902884021

27.

McKeown

Jones

Foy

Wright

Paxton

Blackmon

(2016). Looking back, looking forward: Recovery journeys in a high secure hospital. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 25, 234–242 doi: 10.1111/inm.12204

28.

McKeown

Jones

Wright

Spandler

Wright

Fletcher

Turton

(2014). It's the talk: a study of involvement initiatives in secure mental health settings. Health Expectations, 19, 570–579. doi: 10.1111/hex.12232

29.

Mental Health Research Network [MHRN] (2012). Good practice guidance for involving people with experience of mental health problems in research. London, UK: Mental Health Research Network/National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network.

30.

National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH] (2015). The role of public reviewers. Retrieved April 12, 2015 from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/funding/grant-writing-and-application-process/the-role-of-public-reviewers.shtml

31.

National Survivor User Network [NSUN] & WISH (2011). Unlocking service user involvement practice in forensic settings: Research into the provision of service user involvement in secure settings. Retrieved April 12, 2015 from http://www.nsun.org.uk/assets/downloadableFiles/unlocking-forensic-ui–final-version2.pdf

32.

O'Donnell

Entwhistle

(2004). Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded. Health Policy, 70(3), 281–290. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.04.004

33.

Patenaude

A. L.

(2004). No promises, but I'm willing to listen and tell what I hear: Conducting qualitative research among prison inmates and staff. The Prison Journal, 84(4 Suppl.), 69S–91S. doi: 10.1177/0032885504269898

34.

Sainsbury Centre (2008). A review of service user involvement in prison mental health research. London, UK: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.

35.

Shaw

(2014). Peer support in secure services (Final Report prepared for “Together: for mental wellbeing”). Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://www.together-uk.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/11/Peer-Support-in-Secure-Settings-Final-Report-4-Nov-14.pdf

36.

Simmons

Hawley

C. J.

Gale

T. M.

Sivakumaran

(2010). Service user, patient, client, user or survivor: describing recipients of mental health services. The Psychiatrist, 34(1), 20–23. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.109.025247

37.

Spiers

Harney

Chilvers

(2005). Editorial: Service user involvement in forensic mental health: Can it work? Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16(2), 211–220. doi: 10.1080/14789940500098137

38.

Service User Research Group England [SURGE] (2005). Guidance for good practice: Service user involvement in the UK Mental Health Research Network. London, UK: SURGE / Mental Health Research Network. Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://www.cumbriapartnership.nhs.uk/uploads/File/SURGEGuide.pdf

39.

Service User Research Group England [SURGE] (2006). Brief guide to involving mental health service users in research. London, UK: Service User Research Group for England. Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://studymore.org.uk/surgeb.pdf

40.

Strauss

Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

41.

Tait

Lester

(2005). Encouraging user involvement in mental health services. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11(3), 168–175. doi: 10.1192/apt.11.3.168

42.

Tambuyzer

Pieters

Van Audenhove

(2011). Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all. Health Expectations, 17, 138–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00743.x

43.

Tricco

A. C.

Antony

Zarin

Strifler

Ghassemi

Ivory

Straus

S. E.

(2015). A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Medicine, 13, 224. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6

44.

Wallcraft

Schrank

Amering

(2009). Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

45.

Watt

Cameron

Sturm

Lathlean

Babidge

Blamey

Maddern

(2008). Rapid versus full systematic reviews: validity in clinical practice? ANZ Journal of Surgery, 78, 1037–1040. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04730.x

46.

World Health Organization [WHO] (2011). World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe - policy: European mental health strategy. Retrieved April 12, 2015 from http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/mental-health/policy/european-mental-health-strategy

47.

Wykes

(2003). Blue skies in the Journal of Mental Health? Consumers in research. Journal of Mental Health, 12(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/09638230021000058247

How Best to Engage Users of Forensic Services in Research: Literature Review and Recommendations

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References