Mental health court research has largely assessed program effectiveness using criminal recidivism as an indicator of success. The present study expands this literature by exploring mental health court participants' perceptions of how the mental health court impacted them. We analyzed in-depth interviews with 26 participants from 2 different mental health courts using thematic analysis. Participants identified four salient successes that they perceived to result from mental health court participation: improved psychiatric stability, sobriety, improved relationships, and increased engagement in life and mental health. While reduced substance use and “staying out of trouble” were seen as successes, participants also reported recovery-oriented outcomes like improved relationships with family, mood stability, increased patience, ability to care about others, and greater understanding of mental illness as measures of their success. Although recidivism is an indicator of success, future mental health court research would benefit from utilizing additional measures of success that span criminal justice, recovery, and mental health outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramK. M.TeplinL. A.McClellandG. M. (2003). Comorbidity of severe psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders among women in jail. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(5), 1007–1010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.5.1007
2.
AlmquistL.DoddE. (2009). Mental Health Courts: A guide to research-informed policy and practice. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
3.
AnestisJ. C.CarrbonellJ. L. (2014). Stopping the revolving door: Effectiveness of mental health court in reducing recidivism by mentally ill offenders. Psychiatric Servces, 65, 1105–1122. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201300305
4.
AnthonyW. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990's. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0095655
5.
BontaJ.LawM.HansonK. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123–142.
6.
BoothroydR. A.MercadoC. C.PoythressN. G.ChristyA.PetrilaJ. (2005). Clinical outcomes of defendants in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services, 56(7), 829–834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.7.829
7.
BoothroydR. A.PoythressN. G.McGahaA.PetrilaJ. (2003). The Broward mental health court: Process, outcomes, and service utilization. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 26(1), 55–71. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2527(02)00203-0
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2527(02)00203-0
9.
BurnsP. J.HidayV. A.RayB. (2013). Effectiveness two years postexit of a recently established mental health court. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 189–208. doi: 10.1177/0002764212465416
10.
CampbellM. A.CanalesD. D.WeiR.TottenA. E.MacaulayW. A. C.WershlerJ. L. (2015). Multidimensional evaluation of a mental health court: Adherence to the risk-need-responsivity model. Law and Human Behavior, 39(5), 489–502. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000135
11.
CanadaK. E.HidayV. A. (2014). Procedural justice in mental health court: an investigation of the relation of perception of procedural justice to non-adherence and termination. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 25(3), 321–340. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2014.915338
12.
ChristyA.PoythressN. G.BoothroydR. A.PetrilaJ.MehraS. (2005). Evaluating the efficiency and community safety goals of the Broward County mental health court. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(2), 227–243. 10.1002/bsl.647
13.
ComartinE.KubiakS. P.RayB.TillanderE.HannaJ. (2015). Short- and long-term outcomes of mental health court participants by psychiatric diagnosis. Psychiatric Services, 66(9), 923–929. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400230
14.
CoonsP. M.BowmanE. S. (2010). Psychiatry in Indiana. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
15.
CorriganP. W.AngellB.DavidsonL.MarcusS. C.SalzerM. S.KottsieperP.StanhopeV. (2012). From adherence to self-determination: Evolution of a treatment paradigm for people with serious mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 63(2), 169–173. doi:to.1176/appi.ps.201100065
16.
CosdenM.EllensJ.SchnellJ.Yamini-DioufY. (2005). Efficacy of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 199–214. doi: 10.1002/bsl.638
17.
CosdenM.EllensJ. K.SchnellJ. L.Yamini-DioufY.WolfeM. M. (2003). Evaluation of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(4), 415–427. doi: 10.1002/bsl.542
18.
Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2008). Mental health courts: A primer for policymakers and practitioner. Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project. New York, NY: Author.
19.
Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2009). Mental Health Courts: A Guide to Research-Informed Policy and Practice. New York, NY: Author.
20.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM. L.HansonW. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
DraineJ.SolomonP. (2000). Anxiety and depression symptoms and quality of life among clients of a psychiatric probation and parole services. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24(1), 38–45. doi:10.1037/h0095125
22.
Dirks-LinhorstP. A.LinhorstD. M. (2012a). Recidivism outcomes for suburban mental health court defendants. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 76–91. doi: 10.1007/s12103-010-9092-0
23.
Dirks-LinhorstP. A.LinhorstD. M. (2012b). Recidivism outcomes for suburban mental health court defendants. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 76–91. doi: 10.1007/s12103-010-9092-0
24.
FazelS.DaneshJ. (2002). Serious mental disorder in 23,000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet, 359(9306), 545–550. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07740-1
25.
FloerschJ. (2000). Reading the case record: The oral and written narratives of social workers. Social Service Review, 74(2), 169–192.
26.
FrailingK. (2010). How mental health courts function: Outcomes and observations. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 33, 207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.001
27.
GoldkampJ. (1999). The origin of the treatment drug court in Miami. In TerryW. C. (Ed.), The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation, (pp. 19–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
GottfriedE.CarbonellJ.MillerL. (2014). The impact of judge-defendant communication on mental health court outcomes. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(3), 253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.023
29.
HartwellS. W. (2003). Short-term outcomes for offenders with mental illness released from incarceration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(2), 145–158. doi: 10.1177/0306624X03251093
30.
HerinckxH. A.SwartS. C.AmaS. M.DolezalC. D.KingS. (2005). Rearrest and linkage to mental health services among clients of the Clark County mental health court program. Psychiatric Services, 56(7), 853–857. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.7.853
31.
HidayV. A.RayB. (2010). Arrests two years after exiting a well-established mental health court. Psychiatric Services, 61(5), 463–468. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.5.463
32.
HidayV. A.RayB.WalesH. W. (2014). Predictors of mental health court graduation. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 20(2), 191–199. doi:10.1037/law0000008
33.
HidayV. A.WalesH. W.RayB. (2013). Effectivenes of a short term mental health court: Criminal recidivism one year postexit. Law & Human Behavior, 37, 401–411. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000030
34.
KeatorK. J.CallahanL.SteadmanH. J.VesselinovR. (2013). The impact of treatment on the public safety outcomes of mental health court participants. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(2), 231–243. doi: 10.1177/0002764212465617
35.
KopelovichS.YanosP.PrattC.KoernerJ. (2013). Procedural justice in mental health courts: Judicial practices, participant perceptions, and outcomes related to mental health recovery. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(2), 113–120. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.004
36.
KubiakS. P.BeebleM. L.BybeeD. (2010). Testing the validity of the K6 in detecting major depression and PTSD among jailed women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(1), 64–80. doi: 10.1177/0093854809348139
37.
LambH. R.WeinbergerL. E.GrossB. H. (2004). Mentally ill persons in the criminal justice system: Some perspectives. Psychiatric Quarterly, 75(2), 107–126 doi: 10.1023/B:PSAQ.0000019753.63627.2c
38.
LaudetA. B. (2007). What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 243–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.014
39.
LaudetA. B. (2008). The road to recovery: Where are we going and how do we get there? Empirically-driven conclusions and future directions for service development and research. Substance Use & Misuse, 43(12-13), 2001–2020. doi: 10.1080/10826080802293459
40.
LehmanA.T. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation & Program Planning, 11(1), 51–62. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(88)90033-X
41.
LuskinM. L. (2001). Who is diverted? Case selection for court-monitored mental health treatment. Law & Policy, 23(2), 217–2336. doi: 10.1111/1467-9930.00111
42.
LynchS. M.DeHartD. D.BelknapJ. E.GreenB. L.Dass-BrailsfordP.JohnsonK. A.WhalleyE. (2014). A multisite study of the prevalence of serious mental illness, PTSD, and substance use disorders of women in jail. Psychiatric Services, 65(5), 670–674. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300172
43.
ManciniM. A.LinhorstD. M.BroderickF.BayliffS. (2008). Challenges to implementing the hard reduction approach. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 8(3), 380–408. doi: 10.1080/15332560802224576
44.
McNielD. E.BinderR. L. (2007). Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(9), 1395–1403. doi: 10.1176/appi.apj.2007.06101664
45.
MonsonC. M.GunninD. D.FogelM. H.KyleL. L. (2001). Stopping (or slowing) the revolving door: Factors related to NGRI acquittees' maintenance of a conditional release. Law and Human Behavior, 25(3), 257–267. doi: 10.1023/A:1010745927735
46.
MooreM. E.HidayV. A. (2006). Mental health court outcomes: A comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and traditional court participants. Law & Human Behavior, 30(6), 659–674. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9061-9
47.
MunetzM. R.RitterC.TellerJ. L. S.BonfmeN. (2014). Mental health court and assisted outpatient treatment: Perceived coercion, procedural justice, and program impact. Psychiatric Services, 65(3), 352–358. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.002642012
48.
NolanJ. L. (2010). Harm reduction and the American dream: Drug treatment and problem solving courts in comparative perspective. Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 13, 31–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.002
49.
PadgettD. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
PalermoG. B. (2010). The Nevada mental health courts. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(4), 214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.002
51.
PescosolidoB. (2001). The role of social networks in the lives of persons with disabilities. In AlbrechtG. L.SeelmanK. D.BuryM.. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 468–489). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52.
RayB. (2014). Longer term recidivism of mental health court defendants. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 37, 448–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.017
53.
RayB.DollarC. B. (2013). Examining mental health court completion: A focal concerns perspective. Sociological Quarterly, 54(4), 647–669. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12032
54.
RayB.DollarC. B. (2014). Exploring stigmatization and stigma management in mental health court: Assessing modified labeling theory in a new context. Sociological Forum, 29(3), 720–735. doi: 10.1111/socf.12111
55.
RayB.KubiakS. P.ComartinE. B.TillanderE. (2015). Mental health court outcomes by offense type at admission. Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research, 42, 323–331. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0572-2
56.
RedlichA. D.SteadmanH. J.MonahanJ.PetrilaJ.GriffinP. A. (2005). The second generation of mental health courts. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 11(4), 527–538. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.4.527
57.
SarteschiC. M.VaughnM. G.KimK. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.11.003
58.
SteadmanH. J.DavidsonS.BrownC. (2001). Mental health courts: Their promise and unanswered questions. Psychiatric Services, 52, 457–458. doi: 10.1176/apppi.ps.52.4.457
59.
SteadmanH. J.OsherF.RobbinsP.CaseB.SamuelsS. (2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60(6), 761–765. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.6.761
60.
SteadmanH. J.RedlichA.CallahanL.RobbinsP. C.VesselinovR. (2011). Effect of mental health courts on arrests and jail days: A multisite study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(2), 167–172. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.134
61.
TeplinL. A. (1990). The prevalence of severe mental disorder among male urban jail detainees: Comparison with the epidemiologic catchment-area program. American Journal of Public Health, 80(6), 663–669. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.80.6.663
62.
TeplinL. A. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women. 1. Pretrial jail detainees. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(8), 664–664. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830060047007
63.
TeplinL. A.AbramK. M.McClellandG. M. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women. 1. Pretrial jail detainees. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(6), 505–512. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830060047007
64.
TrupinE.RichardsH. (2003). Seattle's mental health courts: Early indicators of effectiveness. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 26(1), 33–53. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2527(02)00202-9
65.
VerhaaffA.ScottH. (2015). Individual factors predicting mental health court diversion outcome. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 213–228. doi: 10.1177/1049731514523507
66.
WatsonA.HanrahanP.LuchinsD.LurigioA. (2001). Mental health courts and the complex issue of mentally ill offenders. Psychiatric Services, 52(4), 477–81.
