The Relation between Living Group Climate and Reactions to Social Problem Situations in Detained Adolescents: “I Stabbed Him Because He Looked Mean at Me”
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online April, 2015
The Relation between Living Group Climate and Reactions to Social Problem Situations in Detained Adolescents: “I Stabbed Him Because He Looked Mean at Me”
The present study examined the association between living group climate and aversive reactions to social problem situations (e.g., getting angry, bullying or not cooperating with staff) in adolescents in secure residential facilities. The sample consisted of 128 adolescent boys and girls. Results showed an open living group climate—designated as a structured, safe and therapeutic environment—to be associated with less aversive reactions to social problem situations. Living group climate had a negative relation with aversive reactions to social problem situations (β = −.632, p < .001). It is argued that group workers should be trained in providing an open living group climate in order to diminish aversive responses to social problem situations in detained adolescents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonE. (2000). Code of the street. Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. London, UK: Norton & Company.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. (5th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
3.
CraigC. S. (2004). Rehabilitation versus control: An organizational theory of prison management. The Prison Journal, 84, 928–1148. doi: 10.1177/0032885504269394.
4.
CrickN. R.DodgeK. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74.
5.
De JongJ. D. (2007). Kapot moeilijk, een etnografisch onderzoek naar opvallend delinquent groepsgedrag van ‘Marokkaanse’ jongens(‘Dire Straits’, An Ethnographic Inquiry Into Obtrusive Delinquent Group Activity Of Moroccan Boys). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Aksant. http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/304972592.
6.
DeLisiM.DruryA. J.KosloskiA. E.CaudillJ. W.ConisP. J.AndersonC. A.VaughnM. G.BeaverK. M. (2010). The cycle of violence behind bars: Traumatization and institutional misconduct among juvenile delinquents in confinement. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 107–121. doi: 10.1177/1541204009349399.
7.
De SwartJ.J.W. (2011). De professionele jeugdzorgwerker: Kenmerken van jeugdzorgwerkers in relatie tot kwaliteit van de jeugdzorg[the professional youth care worker: Characteristics of youth care workers in relation to quality of youth care]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit. http://hdl.handle.net/1871/24502.
8.
De SwartJ.Van den BroekH.StamsG. J. J. M.AsscherJ. J.Van der LaanP. H.Holbrink-EngelsG.Van der HelmG. H. P. (2012). The effectiveness of institutional youth care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1818–1824. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.015.
9.
DodgeK. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In PerlmutterM. (Ed.), Cognitive perspectives on children's social and behavioral development. Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (27, 18, pp. 77–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
DyeM. H. (2010). Deprivation, importation, and prison suicide: Combined effects of institutional conditions and inmate composition. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 796–806. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.007.
11.
EichelsheimV. I.Van der LaanA. M. (2012). Jongeren en vrijheidsbeneming: Een studie naar de wijze waarop jongeren in justitiële jeugdinrichtingen omgaan met vrijheidsbeneming(Juveniles and restriction of freedom: A study of juveniles' reactions to restriction of freedom in juvenile justice institutions). Den Haag; Boom Juridische uitgevers.
12.
EmlerN.ReicherS. (1995). Adolescence and delinquency: The collective management of reputation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13.
FluttertF.Van MeijelB.Van LeeuwenM.BjørklyS.NijmanH.GrypdonckM. (2011). The development of the Forensic Early warning Signs of Aggression Inventory [FESAI]: preliminary findings. Towards a better management of inpatient aggression. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing25, 129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2010.07.001.
14.
FontaineR. G.DodgeK. A. (2009). The transactional development of individual social information processing and aggressive behavior. In SameroffA. J. (Ed.), Transactional processes in development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
FosterS. L.InderbitzenH. M.NangleD. W. (1993). Assessing acceptance and social skills with peers in childhood current issues. Behavior Modification, 17, 255–286. doi:10.1177/01454455930173003.
16.
GarridoV.MoralesL. A. (2007). Serious (violent or chronic) juvenile offenders: A systematic review of treatment effectiveness in secure corrections. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 7. doi: 10.4073/csr.2007.7.
17.
GoldfriedM. R.D'ZurillaT. J. (1969). A behavioural-analytic model for assessing competence. In SpielbergerC. D. (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press.
18.
GoverA. R.MacKenzieD. L.ArmstrongG. S. (2000). Importation and deprivation explanations of juveniles' adjustment to correctional facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 450–467. doi: 10.1177/0306624X00444004.
19.
GranicI.PattersonG. R. (2006). Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113, 101–131. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.101.
20.
HarderA. T.KalverboerM. E.KnorthE. J. (2011). They have left the building: a review of aftercare for adolescents in residential child and youth care. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 14, 86–104.
21.
HarveyJ. (2007). Young men in prison. Surviving and adapting to life inside. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
22.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
23.
JanzingC.KerstensJ. (2005). Werken in een therapeutisch milieu. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghem.
24.
KaalH. L.BrandF.J.M.Van NieuwenhuijzenM. (2012). Serious juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 2, 66–76. doi: 10.1108/20420921211280051.
25.
KoehlerJ. A.LöselF.AkoensiT. D.HumphreysD. K. (2013). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programs in Europe. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 19–43. doi: 10.1007/s11292-012-9159-7.
26.
KuryH. U.SmarttU. (2002). Prisoner on prisoner violence: victimisation of young offenders in prison. Some German findings. Criminal Justice, 2, 411–437. doi: 10.1177/17488958020020040301.
27.
LairdR. D.MarreroM. D. (2010). Information management and behavior problems: Is concealing misbehavior necessarily a sign of trouble?Journal of Adolescence, 33, 297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.05.018.
28.
LambertE. G.AltheimerI.HoganN. L.Barton-BelessaS. M. (2011). Correlates of correctional orientation in a treatment-oriented prison: A partial test of person−environment fit theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 453–471. doi: 10.1177/0093854811400716.
29.
LieblingA.MarunaS. (2005). Introduction: the effects of imprisonment revisited. In LieblingA.MarunaS. (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 1–32). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
30.
LipseyM. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4, 124–147. doi: 10.1080/15564880802612573.
31.
LittleM. (1990). Young men in prison. Worcester, UK: Billing & Sons.
32.
LoeberR.SlotN. W.van der LaanP. H.HoeveM. (2008). Tomorrow's criminals: The development of child delinquency and effective interventions. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
33.
Loeber, R., Slot, N. W., Van der Laan, P. H., & Hoeve, M. (2010). “Criminele kinderen en toekomstige misdadigers: De kernvragen [Child delinquents and tomorrow's serious delinquents: Key questions addressed in this volume].” In R. Loeber, N. W. Slot, P. H. van der Laan, M. Hoeve, & D. Graas. (Eds.),Misdadigers van morgen? Over de ontwikkeling en effectieve aanpak van jeugddelinquentie onder twaalfminners(pp. 9–20). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SWP.
34.
LöselF.BeelmannA. (2003). Effects of child skills training on preventing antisocial behavior: A systematic review of randomized evaluations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 84–109.
35.
Lösel, F. and Beelmann, A. (2006). Child skills training. In B. C. Welsh and D. P. Farrington (Eds.),Preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims and places(pp. 33–54). Dortrecht, The Netherlands: Wadsworth Publishing.
36.
MaagJ. W. (2005). Social skills training for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and learning disabilities: Problems, conclusions, and suggestions. Exceptionality, 13, 155–172.
37.
MaagJ. W. (2006). Social skills training for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of reviews. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 4–17.
38.
MagerW.RichardM.HarrisM.J.HowardA. (2005). Intervention Groups for Adolescents with Conduct Disorder: Is Aggregation Harmful or Helpful?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 349–362. doi: 10.1007/s10802-005-3572-6.
39.
MaitlandA. S.SluderR. D. (1998). Victimization and youthful prison inmates: An empirical analysis. The Prison Journal, 78, 55–73. doi: 10.1177/0032855598078001005.
40.
MarshallW. L.BurtonD. (2010). The importance of group processes in offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.008.
41.
MatthysW.MaassenG.CuperusJ. M.van EngelandH. (2001) The Assessment of the situational specificity of children's problem behaviour in peer-peer context. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 413–420. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00734.
42.
NangleD. W.EllisJ. T.HansenD. J. (1994). Clinical utility of the Taxonomy of Problematic Social Situations for Children (TOPS): Temporal stability and convergence with peer measures. Education & Treatment of Children, 17, 129–138.
43.
NijhofK.VerhulstA.ScholteH. J.van DamC.VeermanJ. W.EngelsR.C.M.E. (2011). Psychopathic traits of Dutch adolescents in residential care: Identifying subgroups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 59–70. doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9445-7.
44.
Orobio de CastroB.VeermanJ.W.KoopsW.BoschJ. D.MonshouwerH. J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: a Meta analysis. Child Development, 73, 916–934. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00447.
45.
OsgoodD. W.O'Neill BriddellL. (2006). Peer effects in juvenile justice. In DodgeK.DishionT.LansfordJ. (Eds), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions (pp. 141–161). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
ParharK. K.WormithJ. S.DerkzenD. M.BeauregardA. M. (2008). Offender coercion in treatment: A meta-analysis of effectiveness. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1109–1135. doi: 10.1177/0093854808320169.
47.
ParisiN. (1982). Prisoner's pressures and responses. In ParisiN. (Ed.), Coping with imprisonment: Perspectives in Criminal Justice (pp. 9–26). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
RosN.van der HelmG.H.P.WissinkI.SchaftenaarP.StamsG.J.J.M., (2013). Institutional climate and aggression in a secure psychiatric setting. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 24, 713–727. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2013.848460.
49.
SatoW.UonoS.MatsuuraN.ToichiM. (2009). Misrecognition of facial expressions in delinquents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 3, 27–39. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-3-27.
50.
SavageJ. (Ed.) (2009). The development of persistent criminality (pp. 389–422). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195310313.003.0001.
51.
SchubertC. A.MulveyE. P.LoughranT. A.LosoyaS. (2012). Perceptions of institutional experiences and community outcomes for serious adolescent offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 71–93. doi: 10.1177/0093854811426710.
52.
ShapiroC. J.SmithB. H.MaloneP. S.CollaroA. (2010). Natural experiment in deviant peer exposure and youth recidivism. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 242–251. doi: 10.1080/15374410903532635.
53.
SondermanJ.van der HelmG.H.P. (2014). Sfeer is het sleutelwoord, meisjes in de gesloten jeugdzorg maken iets ander mee dan jongens. Sozio, 29–32.
54.
SouvereinF. A.Van der HelmG.H.P.StamsG.J.J.M. (2013). Nothing works in secure residential youth care?Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1941–1945. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.010.
55.
SpelmanW. (2000). What recent studies do (and don't) tell us about imprisonment and crime. Crime and Justice, 27, 419–439.
56.
SykesG. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
TochH. (2008). Punitiveness as ‘behavior management’. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 388–397. doi: 10.1177/0093854807309427.
58.
TochH.KupersT. A. (2007). Violence in prisons, revisited. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45, 1–28. doi: 10.1300/J076v45n03_01.
59.
UleA.SchramA.RiedlA.CasonT. N. (2009). Indirect punishment and generosity towards strangers. Science, 326, 1701–1704. doi: 10.1126/science.1178883.
60.
Van der HelmG.H.P. (2011). First do no harm. Living group climate in secure juvenile correctional institutions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SWP.
61.
Van der HelmG.H.P.BoekeeI.StamsG.J.J.M.Van der LaanP. H. (2011). Fear is the key: keeping the balance between flexibility and control in a Dutch youth prison. Journal of Children's Services, 6, 248–263. doi: 10.1108/17466661111190947
62.
Van der HelmG.H.P.StamsG.J.J.M.Van der LaanP. H. (2011). Measuring group climate in prison. The Prison Journal, 91, 158–176. doi: 10.1177/0032885511403595.
63.
Van der HelmG.H.P.StamsG.J.J.M.Van der StelJ.C.Van LangenM.A.M.Van der LaanP.H. (2012). Group climate and empathy in a sample of incarcerated boys. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 1149–1160. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11421649.
64.
Van der HelmG.H.P.StamsG.J.J.M.Van GenabeekM.van der LaanP. H. (2012). Group climate, personality, and self-reported aggression in incarcerated male youth. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23, 23–39. doi:10.1080/14789949.2011.633615
65.
Van der HelmG.H.P.Van GenabeekM.StamsG.J.J.M.Van der LaanP. H. (2011). Violence in youth prison; the role of Group climate and personality. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 1, 23–40.
66.
Van der HelmP.KlapwijkM.StamsG.J.J.M.Van der LaanP. H. (2009). ‘What works’ for juvenile prisoners: The role of group climate in a youth prison. Journal of Children's Services, 4, 36–48. doi: 10.1108/17466660200900011.
67.
Van der HelmP.MatthysW.MoonenX.GiesenN.van der HeijdeE.S.StamsG.J.J.M. (2013). Measuring inappropriate responses of adolescents to problematic social situations in secure institutional and correctional youth care: A validation study of the TOPS-A. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 1579–1595. doi: 10.1177/0886260512468322.
68.
VermaesI. P. R.NijhofK. S. (2014). Zijn jongeren in Jeugdzorgplus anders dan jongeren in de open residentiele jeugdzorg?Orthopedagogiek: Onderzoek & Praktijk, 53, 33–46.
69.
WeissB.CaronA.BallS.TappJ.JohnsonM.WeiszJ. R. (2005). Iatrogenic effects of group treatment for antisocial youths. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 73, 1036–1044. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1036.
70.
WhiteH. R.ShiJ.HirschfieldP.MunE. Y.LoeberR. (2010). Effects of institutional confinement for delinquency on levels of depression and anxiety among male adolescents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 295–313.doi: 10.1177/1541204009358657.
71.
WidomC. S. (1989), Child abuse, neglect and violent criminal behavior. Criminology, 27, 251–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01032.x
72.
WortleyR. K. (2002). Situational prison control: Crime prevention in correctional institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
