PRISM: Promoting Risk Intervention by Situational Management (Johnstone & Cooke, 2008) provides a systematic process for evaluating a range of situational risk factors known to influence institutional violence in prisons and secure hospital settings. This paper reports on findings from the first multiple case-study evaluation using this protocol. We applied PRISM in the Scottish Prison Service (SPS). The SPS is a modern prison system. It respects prisoners’ human rights, maintains order and control via humane and dignified means, and works towards the rehabilitation of prisoners and reducing reoffending rates overall. The SPS comprises a national headquarters where relevant policies and protocols are derived but governors and senior management teams are based within the local prisons to ensure the effective running of the organisation. While the SPS can boast decreasing rates of serious violence, there are significant variations across sites. We used PRISM to explore the relevance of situational risk factors to understanding these variations. Results suggested that the protocol was a promising paradigm for assessing risk factors unique to each site as well as showing utility for exposing problems related to the national policies and practices. The risk assessment led to a range of risk management interventions being proposed. The implications of the findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association, (APA) & National Council on Measurement. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
BaldwinS.1985. Effects of furniture rearrangement on the atmosphere of wards in a maximum security hospital. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 36(5): 525–528.
3.
BeyerL.HigginsD.J.BromfieldL.M.2005. Understanding organisational risk factors for child maltreatment: A review of the literature, Australian Institute of Family Studies.
BoerD.P.HartS.D.KroppP.R.WebsterC.D.1997. Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk – 20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence (SVR-20), Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Institute of Family Violence and Mental Health Law & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
6.
BriggsC.S.SundtJ.L.CastellanoT.C.2003. The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology., 41: 1341–1376.
7.
ByrneJ.M.HummerD.2008. “Examining the impact of institutional culture on prison violence and disorder: an evidence-based review”. In The culture of prison violence, Edited by: ByrneJ. M.HummerD.TaxmanF.S.Boston: Pearson Publication.
8.
ByrneJ.M.HummerD.TaxmanF.S.2008. The culture of prison violence, Boston: Pearson Publication.
9.
ClarkeR.V.1997. Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd Edition), New York: Harrow and Heston.
10.
ClementsC.B.1982. The relationship of offender classification to the problems of prison overcrowding. Crime and Delinquency., 28: 72–81.
11.
CookeD.J.1989. Violence in prisons: The influence of regime factors. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice., 30: 95–109.
12.
CookeD.J.1992. “The psychological impact of prison riots on prison staff in Scotland”. In Prison Service Psychology Conference, Edited by: BoddisS.133–143. HMSO.
13.
CookeD.J.Personality disorder and violence: Understanding violence risk and risk processes.. Journal of Personality Disorders,
14.
CookeD.J.JohnstoneL.Somewhere over the rainbow: Improving violence risk management in institutional settings. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health,
15.
CookeD.J.WozniakE.JohnstoneL.2008. Casting light on prison violence in Scotland. Evaluating the impact of situational risk factors.. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 35: 1065–1078.
16.
CoxV.C.PaulusP.B.McCainG.1984. Prison crowding research: The relevance for prison housing standards and a general approach regarding crowding phenomena.. American Psychologist, 39: 1148–1160.
17.
DaffernM.MayerM.M.MartinT.2003. A preliminary investigation into patterns of aggression in an Australian forensic psychiatric hospital. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 1(4): 67–84.
18.
DiIulioJ.1987. Governing prisons, New York: Free Press.
19.
DitchfieldJ.1991. “Control in prison”. In A review of the literature, London: HMSO.
20.
DouglasK.C.1991. Violence risk assessment: science and practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4: 149–184.
21.
DuhartD.T.2001. Violence in the workplace, 1993-1999Bureau of Justice Statistics Report. US Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. NJS 190076
22.
EdgarK.O'DonnellI.MartinC.2003. Prison violence. The dynamics of conflict, fear and power, Devon: Willan.
23.
FlanneryR. B.Jr.HansonM.A.PenkW.E.PastvaG.J.NavonM.A.FlanneryG.J.1997. Hospital downsizing and patients' assaults on staff. The Psychiatric Quarterly, 68(1): 67–76.
24.
FolgerR.StarlickiD.1995. A popcorn model of workplace violencePaper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, British Columbia
25.
GadonL.JohnstoneL.CookeD.J.2005. Situational risk factors and institutional violence. A qualitative analysis of staff perceptions, Glasgow, UK: Greater Glasgow Primary Care NHS Trust, Research and Development Directorate.
26.
GadonL.JohnstoneL.CookeD.J.2006. Situational variables and institutional violence. A systematic review of the literature.. Clinical Psychology Review, 26: 515–534.
27.
GendreauP.GogginC.E.LawM.A.1997. Predicting prison misconducts.. Criminal Justice and Law, 21: 49–67.
28.
GoettingA.HowsenR.M.1986. Correlates of prisoner misconduct.. Journal of Quantative Criminology, 2: 49–67.
29.
GoffmanE.1961. Asylums, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
30.
HarrisG.T.VarneyG.W.1986. A ten-year study of assaults and assaulters on a maximum security psychiatric unit.. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1(2): 173–191.
31.
HartS.D.CookeD.J.MichieC.2007. The precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the “Margins of Error” of Group versus Individual Predictions of Violence.. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(49): 60–65.
32.
HartS.D.KroppP.R.LawsD. R.KlaverJ.LoganC.WattK.A.2003. The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP), Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute.
33.
HodgkinsonP.E.McIvorI.PhilipsM.1985. Patient assaults on staff in a psychiatric hospital: A 2 year retrospective study.. Medicine, Science and the Law, 25: 288–294.
KratcoskiP.C.1988. Factors relevant to patient assault. Issues in Mental Health Nursing., 9: 239–258.
37.
KroppP.R.HartS.D.LyonD.2008. The Stalking Assessment Manual, Vancouver, BC: Proactive resolutions.
38.
KroppP.R.HartS.D.WebsterC.D.EavesD.1995. Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (2nd Edition), Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.
39.
LanzaM.L.1988. Factors relevant to patient assault.. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 9: 239–258.
40.
LieblingA.2008. “Why prison staff culture matters.”. In The culture of prison violence, Edited by: ByrneJ. M.HummerD.TaxmanF.S.105–123. Boston: Pearson Education.
41.
LoganC.JohnstoneL.Personality disorder and violence: Making the link through risk formulation.. Journal of Personality Disorders.,
42.
MaguireM.2001. Uncomfortably numb. A prison requiem, Edinburgh: Luath Press.
43.
2000. “McLean Committee Report”. In A Report on the Committee on Serious Violent and Sexual Offenders, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
44.
MegargeeE.I.1982. Psychological assessment in jails: Implementation of the standards recommended by the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards. Crime and Delinquency Issues., 82: 100–125.
45.
MischelW.1968. Personality and assessment, New York: John Wiley.
46.
MonahanJ.SteadmanH.SilverE.AppelbaumP.RobbinsP.C.MulveyE.P.2001. Rethinking risk assessment. The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence, New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
MorrisonE.MormanC.BonnerG.TaylorC.AbrahamI.LathanL.2002. Reducing staff injuries and violence in a forensic psychiatric setting. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 16(3): 108–117.
48.
NeilC.2010. The presence and relevance of situational risk factors for institutional violence in the state hospitalUnpublished Research Report
49.
Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA). US Department of Labor. 1970. The Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1970 (OSH Act)Washington, DC20210. www.osha.govus
50.
PerlineI.ThomasC.C.2004. The psychology and law of workplace violence, Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
51.
PorporinoF.1986. Managing violent individuals in correctional settings.. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1: 213–237.
52.
RiceM.QuinseyV.1989. Violence in institutions: Understanding, prevention, and control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe & Huber.
53.
RichterD.W.R.E.2006. Violence in mental health settings. Causes, consequences, management, NY: Springer.
54.
Risk Management Authority. 2006. Standards and guidelines for risk assessmentwww.rmascotland.gov
55.
Risk Management Authority. 2008. Standards and guidelines for preparing risk management plans for offenders subject to an order of lifelong restrictionwww.rmascotland.gov
56.
ScottP.D.1977. Assessing dangerousness in criminals.. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131: 127–142.
57.
Scottish Prison Service. 1990. Opportunity and responsibility, Edinburgh, UK: HMSO.
58.
Scottish Prison Service. 1998. Assessment and control, Edinburgh, UK: HMSO.
59.
ScrattonP.S.SimJ.SkidmoreP.1991. Prisons under protest, Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
60.
SilverE.MulveyE.P.MonahanJ.1999. Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients.. Law and Human Behavior, 23: 237–255.
61.
TochH.1985. The catalytic situation in the violence equation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 316: 1230–1232.
62.
TochH.1997. Corrections: A humanistic approach, New York: Harrow and Heston.
63.
WalrathC.2001. Evaluation of prisoner run alternative to violence project—The impact of inmate-to-prisoner intervention.. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(7): 697–711.
64.
WaltersG.D.1998. Time series and correlational analysis of inmate-initiated assaultive incidents in a large correctional system. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology., 42: 124–132.
65.
WebsterC.D.2006. Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgement scheme.. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24: 747–766.
66.
WebsterC.D.DouglasK.S.EavesD.HartS.D.1997. Historical Clinical Risk 20, Vancouver BC: Mental Health and Law Policy Institute and Simon Fraser University.
67.
Weizmann-HeneliusG.SuutalaH.J.O.2000. Violence in a Finnish forensic psychiatric hospital. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 54(4): 269–273.
68.
WhittingtonR.RichterD.2006. “From the individual to the interpersonal: Environment and interaction in the escalation of violence in mental health settings.”. In Violence in mental health settings, Edited by: RichterD.47–65. NY: Springer.
69.
WhittingtonR.WhykesT.1994. Violence in psychiatric hospitals: Are certain staff prone to being assaulted?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19: 219–225.
70.
WortleyR.2002. Situational prison control. Crime prevention in correctional institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
YassiA.TateR.CooperJ.JenkinsJ.TrottierJ.1998. Causes of staff abuse in health care facilities. Implications for prevention.. Official Journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses, 46(10): 484–491.
72.
YinR.D.2003. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd Edition, California: Applied Social Research Methods Series, Sage.
73.
ZeemanE.C.HallC.S.HarrisonP.J.MarriageG.H.ShaplandP.H.1977. A model for prison disturbances.. British Journal of Criminology, 17: 251–263.
