Sex offenders (N = 468) were released from custody and recidivism outcome was recorded. The Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20) was scored for each offender and the relationship between age-at-release and SVR-20 item and total scores was examined. SVR-20 total scores were not correlated with age-at-release (r = .-057). SVR-20 scores were combined with a score representing the age of the offender at their release from custody. On the basis of ROC analysis, predictive accuracy was significantly enhanced when age-atrelease was included in the risk score. We suggest that the SVR-20, and perhaps other similar risk instruments, could be improved by including age-at-release information. We discuss the possibility that the advantage obtained by empirical actuarial instruments may be due in part to their close relation with age-at-release.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarbareeH.E.BlanchardR.2008. “Sexual deviance over the lifespan: Reductions in deviant sexual behavior in the aging sex offender”. In Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment and treatment, Edited by: LawsR.R.’DonohueW.T. O. 37–60. New York: Guilford.
2.
BarbareeH. E.BlanchardR.LangtonC. M.2003. “The development of sexual aggression through the life span: The effect of age on sexual arousal and recidivism among sex offenders”. In Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management, Edited by: PrentkyR.A.JanusE. S.SetoM. C. Vol. 989, 59–71. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
3.
BarbareeH.E.LangtonC.M.BlanchardR.2007. Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the VRAG and SORAG: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 6: 29–46.
4.
BoerD.P.HartS.D.KroppP.R.WebsterC.D.1997. Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20, Vancouver, BC: The British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.
5.
DickeyR.NussbaumD.ChevolleauK.DavidsonH.2002. Age as a differential characteristic of rapists, pedophiles, and sexual sadists. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28: 211–218.
6.
DorenD. M.2002. Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
EppersonD. L.KaulJ. D.HuotS. J.HesseltonD.AlexanderW.GoldmanR.1998. Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool – Revised (MnSOST-R), St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
8.
FazelS.SjöstedtG.LångströmN.GrannM.2006. Risk factors for criminal recidivism in older sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18: 159–167.
9.
HanleyJ. A.McNeilB. J.1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143: 29–36.
10.
HansonR. K.The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. User report 1997–04. 1997. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada
11.
HansonR.K.2002. Recidivism and age: Follow-up data on 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17: 1046–1062.
12.
HansonR.K.2006. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18: 343–355.
13.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK.Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Public Works and Government Services Canada. Cat. No.: PS3–1/20042E-PDF. ISBN: 0–662–36397–3. 2004.
14.
HansonR.K.Morton-BourgonK.The accuracy of recidivism risk instruments for sexual offenders: A metaanalysis. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada. Cat. No.: PS4–36/2007E. ISBN No.: 978–0-66245166–2. 2007.
15.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD.Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. User report 1999–02. 1999. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada
16.
HarrisG.T.RiceM.E.2007. Adjusting actuarial violence risk assessments based on aging or the passage of time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34: 297–313.
17.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L.LalumièreM. L.BoerD.LangC.2003. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15: 413–425.
18.
HartS.D.KroppP.R.LawsD.R.KlaverJ.LoganC.WattK.A.2003. The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocal (RSVP), Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
19.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM.1983. Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89: 552–584.
20.
KeppelG.1982. Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 2nd, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
21.
KroppP.R.HartS.D.WebsterC.D.EavesD.1995. Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide, Vancouver, British Columbia, , Canada: The British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.
22.
LangtonC.M.BarbareeH.E.SetoM.C.PeacockE.J.HarkinsL.HansenK.T.2007. Actuarial assessment of risk for re-offence among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the Static-2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34: 37–59.
23.
MercadoC.C.OgloffJ.R.P.2006. Risk and preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30: 49–59.
24.
McGrath, R.J., & Cumming, G.F. (2003). Sex Offender Treatment Needs and Progress Scale ManualDownloaded from the Centre for Sex Offender Management's (CSOM) websitehttp://www.csom.org/ref/assessment.html (Accessed: 3 February 2008).
25.
McGrathR.J.CummingG.F.LivingstonJ.A.Predictive validity of the Sex Offender Treatment Needs and Progress Scale (TPS). Paper presented at the Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Salt Lake City, UT.
26.
McGrathR.J.HokeS.E.LivingstonJ.A.CummingG.F.The Vermont Assessment of Sex-Offender Risk (VASOR): An initial reliability and validity study. Paper presented at the Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. San Antonio, TX.
27.
PrentkyR.A.LeeA.F.S.2007. Effect of age-at-release on long term sexual re-offense rates in civilly committed sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19: 43–59.
28.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A.1998. Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.1995. Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63: 737–748.
30.
SampsonR.J.LaubJ.H.2003. Life course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41: 301–339.
31.
SwetsJ. A.1986. Forms of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: Implications for theory and measurement performance. Psychological Bulletin, 99: 181–198.
32.
SwetsJ. A.DawesR. M.MonahanJ.2000. Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1: 1–26.
33.
ThorntonD.2006. Age and sexual recidivism: A variable connection. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18: 123–135.
34.
WebsterC.D.DouglasK.S.EavesD.HartS.D.1997. HCR-20 Assessing Risk for Violence (Version 2), Vancouver, British Columbia, , Canada: Simon Fraser University.
35.
WollertR.Validation of a Bayesian method for assessing sexual recidivism risk. Paper presented at the 115th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. August 2007 , San Francisco, CA.
