This article provides a review of the ways in which the legal system affects youth with mental disorders and developmental delays. Youth who suffer from mental disorders present a special challenge to the justice system, both in terms of identification and treatment. First, a brief history of the juvenile court is provided, with a special emphasis on the conflicting missions of the court. Then, the ambiguity surrounding legal definitions of mental illness is briefly examined. Next, case and statutory laws and other legal provisions for addressing mental health issues for juveniles are reviewed for each stage of justice system processing – intake/pretrial proceedings, waiver of jurisdiction, adjudication, disposition, and treatment/monitoring of placement. Policy recommendations include a mandated right to treatment for juveniles suffering from severe mental disorders, a nd the extension of competence requirements and the insanity defense to the juvenile court. Suggestions for future research are also identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1995. Alexander S. v. Boyd, 876 F. Supp. 773
2.
AltschulerD.M.1999. “Trends and issues in the adultification of juvenile justice.”. In Research to results: Effective community corrections Edited by: HarrisP.233–271. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association..
3.
AltschulerD.M.1998. “Intermediate sanctions and community treatment for serious and violent juvenile offenders.”. In Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions Edited by: LoeberR.FarringtonD.P.367–385. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage..
4.
AugimeriL.K.KoeglC.J.WebsterC.D.LeveneK.S.2001. Early assessment risk list for boys – Version 2 (EARL-20B)Toronto: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre..
5.
BarnumR.2000. “Clinical and forensic evaluation of competence to stand trial in juvenile defendants.”. In Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice193–223. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
6.
BishopD.FrazierC.2000. “Consequences of transfer.”. In The changing borders of juvenile justice Edited by: FaganJ.ZimringF.E.227–276. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
7.
BonnieR.J.1993. The competence of criminal defendants: Beyond Dusky and Drope. Miami Law Review, 47: 539–601.
8.
BonnieR.J.GrissoT.2000. “Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders.”. In Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice73–103. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
9.
BorumR.2000. Assessing violence risk among youth. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56: 1263–1288.
10.
BorumR.BartelP.ForthA.2002. Manual for the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Consultation Version.Tampa, Florida: Florida Mental health Institute at University of South Florida..
11.
2000. Brad H. v. City of New York, 712 N.Y.S. 2d 336
12.
BrummerK.2001. Transitional mental health services for children leaving the juvenile justice system.Washington, DC: The Youth Law Center..
13.
BridgesG.S.SteenS.1998. Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63: 554–570.
14.
BurrellS.WarboysL.2000. Special education and the juvenile justice systemWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention..
15.
ButterfieldF.1995. All God's children: The Bosket family and the American tradition of violenceNew York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf..
16.
ButtsJ.AdamsW.2001. Anticipating space needs in juvenile detention and correction facilitiesWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention..
17.
ChernoffN.2001. Do youth in juvenile justice institutions or child welfare systems have a right to mental health care?Washington, DC: The Youth Law Center..
18.
CocozzaJ.J.SkowyraK.2000. Youth with mental health disorders: Issues and emerging responses. Juvenile Justice Journal, 7: 3–13.
19.
2000. Commonwealth v. Chatman, 260 Va. 562
20.
CowdenV.L.McKeeG.R.1995. Competency to stand trial in juvenile delinquency proceedings: Cognitive maturity and the attorney-client relationship. Journal of Family Law, 33: 629–660.
21.
DawsonR.O.2000. “Judicial waiver in theory and practice.”. In The changing borders of juvenile justice Edited by: FaganJ.ZimringF.E.45–81. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
22.
DiIulioJ.1995. The coming of the Super-Predators. The Weekly Standard, November 27: 23
23.
1975. Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162
24.
1960. Dusky v. U.S., 362 U.S. 402
25.
EwingC.P.1990. Juveniles or adults? Forensic assessment of juveniles considered for trial in criminal court. Forensic Reports, 3: 3–13.
26.
1979. Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707
27.
FeldB.1997. Abolish the juvenile court: Youthfulness, criminal responsibility, and sentencing policy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88: 68–136.
28.
FeldB.1999. Bad kidsNew York: Oxford University Press..
29.
FeldB.C.2000. “Juveniles' waiver of legal rights: Confessions, Miranda and the right to counsel.”. In Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice105–138. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
FoxV.B.StinchcombJ.B.1994. Introduction to corrections, , 4th ed.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall..
32.
FriedC.S.ReppucciN.D.2001. Criminal decision making: The development of adolescent judgment, criminal responsibility, and culpability. Law & Human Behavior, 25: 45–61.
33.
Frost ClauselL.E.BonnieR.J.2000. “Juvenile justice on appeal.”. In The changing borders of juvenile justice Edited by: FaganJ.ZimringF.E.181–206. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
34.
GrissoT.2003. “Forensic evaluation in delinquency cases.”. In Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology, Vol. 11 Edited by: GoldsteinA.315–334. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
35.
GrissoT.1998. Forensic evaluation of juvenilesSarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press..
36.
GrissoT.1997. The competence of adolescents as trial defendants. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 3: 3–32.
37.
GrissoT.1981. Juveniles' waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competenceNew York: Plenum..
38.
GrissoT.BarnumR.FletcherK.E.CauffmanE.PeuscholdD.2001. Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument for mental health needs of juvenile justice youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40: 541–548.
39.
GrissoT.SteinbergL.WoolardJ.CauffmanE.ScottE.GrahamS.LexcenF.ReppucciN.SchwartzR.2003. Juveniles' competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents' and adults' capacities as trial defendants. Law & Human Behavior, 27: 333–364.
40.
GrissoT.TomkinsA.CaseyP.1988. Psychosocial concepts in juvenile law. Law and Human Behavior, 12: 403–437.
41.
HarringtonM.M.KearyA.O.1982. The insanity defense in juvenile delinquency proceedings. The Prosecutor, 17: 31–35.
42.
HeilbrunK.HawkG.TateD.C.1996. Juvenile competence to stand trial: Research issues in practice. Law and Human Behavior, 20: 573–578.
43.
HogeR.D.AndrewsD.A.1999. The youth level of service/case management inventory and manual (revised)Ottowa: Department of Psychology, Carleton University..
44.
HollandP.MlyniecW.J.1995. Whatever happened to the right to treatment: The modern quest for a historical promise. Temple Law Review, 68: 1791–1835.
45.
1994. Hughes v. State, 653 A. 2d 241 (Del.
46.
1996. In re Boot, 925 P. 2d 964 (Wash.
47.
1967. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1
48.
1970. In re Winship, 379 U.S. 358
49.
1972. Jackson v. Indiana, 507 U.S. 715
50.
KamradtB.2000. Wraparound Milwaukee: Aiding youth with mental health needs. Juvenile Justice, 7: 14–23.
51.
KazdinA.2000. “Adolescent development, mental disorders, and decision making of delinquent youths.”. In Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice33–65. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
52.
1966. Kent v. U.S., 383 U.S. 541
53.
KruhI.P.BrodskyS.L.1997. Clinical evaluations for transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Current practices and future research. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15: 151–165.
54.
LeveneK.S.AugimeriL.K.PeplerD.WalshM.WebsterC.D.KoeglC.J.2001. Early assessment risk list for girls – Version 1(EARL-21G)Toronto: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre..
55.
LexcenF.J.2000. Adolescent competence to stand trial: Neuropsychological, psychopathological, & familial variablesUniversity of Virginia.. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation
56.
LexcenF.J.ReppucciN.D.1998. Effects of psycho-pathology on adolescent medical decision-making. University of Chicago, Law-School Roundtable, 6: 63–106.
57.
McGahaA.OttoR.K.McClarenM.D.PetrilaJ.2001. Juveniles adjudicated incompetent to proceed: A descriptive study of Florida's competence restoration program. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29: 427–437.
58.
McKeeG.R.SheaS.J.1999. Competency to stand trial in family court: Characteristics of competent and incompetent juveniles. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 27: 65–73.
59.
1971. McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528
60.
1992. Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437
61.
MenziesR.WebsterC.McMainS.StaleyS.ScaglioneR.1994. The dimensions of dangerousness revisited: Assessing predictions about violence. Law and Human Behavior, 18: 1–28.
62.
1992. Miletic v. Natalucci-Persichetti, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22758
63.
1966. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436
64.
MonahanJ.1996. Violence prediction: The past twenty and the next twenty years. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23: 107–120.
65.
MonahanJ.1992. Mental disorder and violent behavior: Perceptions and evidence. American Psychologist, 47: 511–521.
66.
MonahanJ.1981. The clinical prediction of violent behaviorWashington, DC: Government Printing House..
67.
1977. Morgan v. Sproat, 432 F. Supp. 1130
68.
MulveyE.P.1994. Assessing the evidence of a link between mental illness and violence. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 45: 663–668.
69.
MulveyE.P.1984. “Judging amenability to treatment in juvenile offenders: Theory and practice.”. In Children, mental health, and the law Edited by: ReppucciN.D.WeithornL.A.MulveyE.P.MonahanJ.195–210. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage..
70.
MulveyE.P.1982. Scenes from a marriage: How can juvenile justice and mental health go on together?. Forensic Reports, 2: 9–24.
71.
MulveyE.P.ReppucciN.D.1988. The context of clinical judgment: The effect of resource availability on judgments of amenability to treatment in juvenile offenders. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16: 525–545.
72.
OdgersC.L.MorretiM.M.ReppucciN.D.Examining the science and practice of violence risk assessment with female adolescents. Law and Human Behavior., (In press)
73.
OttoR.K.1992. Prediction of dangerous behavior: A review and analysis of “second-generation” research. Forensic Reports, 5: 103–133.
74.
OttoR.K.GreensteinJ.J.JohnsonM.K.FriedmanR.M.1992. “Prevalence of mental disorders among youth in the juvenile justice system.”. In Responding to the mental health needs of youth in the juvenile justice system Edited by: CocozzaJ.J.7–48. Seattle, WA: The National Coalition for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Justice System..
75.
1982. People v. Thorpe, 641 P. 2d 935 (Col.
76.
PollockE.S.2001. Those crazy kids: Providing the insanity defense in juvenile courts. Minnesota Law Review, 85: 2041–2079.
77.
ReddingR.E.FrostL.E.2002. Adjudicative competence in the modern juvenile court. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 9: 353–410.
78.
ReppucciN.D.1999. Adolescent development and juvenile justice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27: 307–326.
79.
ReppucciN.D.FriedC.S.SchmidtM.G.2002. “Youth violence: Risk and protective factors.”. In Multi-problem youth: A foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions, and outcomes Edited by: CorradoR.R.RoeschR.HartS.D.3–22. Amsterdam: ISO Press..
80.
ReppucciN.D.ReddingR.E.November/December2000. Screening instruments for mental illness in juvenile offendersNovember/December, 52–53. Correctional Mental Health Report
81.
1983. Santana v. Collazo, 714 F. 2d 1172
82.
1984. Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253
83.
SeagraveD.GrissoT.2002. Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law & Human Behavior, 26: 219–239.
84.
ScottE.S.2000. “Criminal responsibility in adolescence: Lessons from developmental psychology.”. In Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice291–324. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
85.
SloboginC.1999. Treating kids right: Deconstructing and reconstructing the amenability to treatment concept. The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 10: 299–333.
86.
SickmundM.SnyderH.N.Poe-YamagataE.1997. Juvenile offenders and victims: 1997 update on violenceWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention..
87.
SilverE.MulveyE.P.MonahanJ.1999. Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients: Toward an ecological approach. Law and Human Behavior, 23: 235–253.
88.
SnyderH.N.SickmundM.1999. Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national reportWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention..
89.
SnyderH.N.SickmundM.Poe-YamagataE.2000. Juvenile transfers to criminal court in the 1990s: Lessons learned from four studiesWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention..
90.
1995. State v. Martin, 530 N.W. 2d 420 (Wis. Ct. App.
91.
1995. State v. Mohi, 901 P. 2d 991 (Utah
92.
SteadmanH.J.MulveyE.P.MonahanJ.RobbinsP.C.AppelbaumP.S.1998. Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55: 393–401.
93.
SteadmanH.J.VeyseyB.M.1997. Providing services for jail inmates with mental disordersWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice..
94.
SteinbergL.SchwartzR.2000. “Developmental psychology goes to court.”. In Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice Edited by: GrissoT.SchwartzR.9–31. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
95.
TanenhausD.S.2000. “The evolution of transfer out of the juvenile court.”. In The changing borders of juvenile justice Edited by: FaganJ.ZimringF.E.13–43. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press..
96.
TorbetP.GableR.HurstH.IVMontgomeryI.SzymanskiL.ThomasD.1996. State responses to serious and violent juvenile crimeWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention..
97.
TorbetP.SzymanskiL.1998. State legislative responses to violent juvenile crime: 1996–97 updateWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention..
98.
1999. Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 F. 3d 1160
99.
2000. Williams v. McKeithen, 121 F. Supp. 2d 943
100.
WiebushR.G.McNultyB.LeT.2000. Implementation of the intensive community-based aftercare programWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention..
101.
1977. Woodard v. Wainwright, 556 F. 2d 781 (5th Cir.
102.
WoolardJ.L.FriedC.S.ReppucciN.D.2001. “Toward an expanded definition of adolescent competence in legal situations.”. In Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge Edited by: RoeschR.CorradoR.R.DempsterR.21–39. New York, NY: Routledge..
103.
WoolardJ.L.GrossS.MulveyE.P.ReppucciN.D.1992. “Legal issues affecting mentally disordered youth in the juvenile justice system.”. In Responding to the mental health needs of youth in the juvenile justice system Edited by: CocozzaJ.J.91–106. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press..
104.
WorrellC.1985. Pretrial detention of juveniles: Denial of equal protection masked by the Parens Patriae doctrine. Yale Law Journal, 95: 174–193.
