Although the Antisocial Features scale of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 2007) is a robust predictor of institutional aggression, recent research (Edens & Ruiz, 2005, 2006) suggests its efficacy is limited among offenders who engage in positive impression management. In this follow-up study, we explored other PAI variables that might predict aggression among 134 prison inmates who Edens and Ruiz (2005, 2006) identified as producing defensive PAI profiles. Somewhat counterintuitively, the Nonsupport scale was negatively associated with aggressive-defiant and physically aggressive infractions in this subgroup of inmates. Results are discussed in the context of the “threatened egotism” literature and implications for institutional risk assessment are reviewed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaerR.MillerJ.2002. Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI-2: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 14: 16–26.
2.
BaityM.R.SiefertC.J.ChambersA.BlaisM.A.2007. Deceptiveness on the PAI: A study of naïve faking with psychiatric patients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88: 16–24.
3.
BaumeisterR.BushmanB.CampbellW.2000. Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence result from low self-esteem or from threatened egotism?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9: 26–29.
4.
BaumeisterR.F.HeathertonT.F.TiceD.M.1993. When ego threats lead to self-re gulation failure: Negative consequences of high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 64: 141–156.
5.
Ben-PorathY.S.2003. “Assessing personality and psychopathology with self-report inventories”. In Handbook of psychology, Edited by: GrahamJ.R.Naglieri'sJ.A.Vol. 10, 553–578. New York: Wiley.
6.
BirkelandS.MansonT.KisamoreJ.BrannickM.SmithM.2006. A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14: 317–335.
7.
Buffington-VollumJ.K.EdensJ.F.JohnsonD.W.JohnsonJ.2002. Psychopathy as a predictor of institutional misbehavior among sex offenders: A prospective replication. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29: 497–511.
8.
CaleE.LilienfeldS.2006. Psychopathy factors and risk for aggressive behavior: A test of the “threatened egotism” hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 30: 51–74.
9.
CohenJ.1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, , 2nd ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
EdensJ.F.1999. Aggressive children's self-systems and the quality of their relationships with significant others. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4: 151–177.
11.
EdensJ.F.PoythressN.G.LilienfeldS.O.1999. Identifying inmates at risk for disciplinary infractions: A comparison of two measures of psychopathy. Behavioral Science and the Law, 17: 435–443.
12.
EdensJ.F.RuizM.A.2006. On the validity of validity scales: The importance of defensive responding in the prediction of institutional misconduct. Psychological Assessment, 18: 220–224.
13.
EdensJ.F.RuizM.A.2005. Personality Assessment Inventory Interpretive Report for Correctional Settings (PAI-CS) professional manual, Lutz, FL: PAR, Inc.
14.
HaddockC.K.RindskopfD.ShadishW.R.1998. Using odds ratios as effect sizes for meta-analysis of dichotomous data: A primer on methods and issues. Psychological Methods, 3: 339–353.
15.
HoganJ.BarrettP.HoganR.2007. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1270–1285.
16.
HoldenR.2007. Socially desirable responding does moderate personality scale validity both in experimental and in nonexperimental contexts. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39: 184–201.
17.
HoldenR.2008. Underestimating the effects of faking on the validity of self-report personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 44: 311–321.
18.
HopwoodC.J.BakerK.L.MoreyL.C.2008. Extra-test validity of selected Personality Assessment Inventory scales and indicators in an inpatient substance abuse setting. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90: 574–577.
19.
JordanC.H.SpencerS.J.ZannaM.P.Hoshino-BrowneE.CorrellJ.2003. Secure and defensive high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85: 969–978.
20.
LambirdK.MannT.2006. When do ego threats lead to self-regulation failure? Negative consequences of defensive high self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32: 1177–1187.
21.
MarzukP.TardiffK.HirschC.1992. The epidemiology of murder-suicide. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267: 3174–3183.
22.
MillsJ.KronerD.2006. Impression management and self-report among violent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21: 178–192.
23.
MoreyL.C.1996. An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
24.
MoreyL.2007. The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual, , 2nd ed., Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
25.
MoreyL.C.HopwoodC.J.2007. Casebook for the Personality Assessment Inventory: A Structural Summary Approach, Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
26.
MyersW.C.ScottK.BurgessA.W.BurgessA.G.1995. Psychopathology, biopsychosocial factors, crime characteristics, and classification of 25 homicidal youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34: 1483–1489.
27.
PaulhusD.L.1998. Manual for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR-7), North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
28.
PeeblesJ.MooreR.J.1998. Detecting socially desirable responding with the Personality Assessment Inventory: The Positive Impression Management Scale and the Defensiveness Index. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54: 621–628.
29.
PiedmontR.McCraeR.RiemannR.AngleitnerA.2000. On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 582–593.
30.
RogersR.2008. “An introduction to response styles”. In Clinical assessment of malingering and deception, , 3rd ed., 3–13. New York: Guilford. Richard Rogers' (Ed.)
31.
RiceM.E.HarrisG.T.2005. Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen's dr. Law and Human Behavior, 29: 615–620.
32.
ScarpaA.HadenS.2006. Community violence victimization and aggressive behavior: The moderating effects of coping and social support. Aggressive Behavior, 32: 502–515.
33.
SelbomM.BagbyR.M.2008. Validity of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) L-r and K-r scales in detecting underreporting in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 20: 370–376.
34.
SilverE.TeasdaleB.2005. Mental disorder and violence: An examination of stressful life events and impaired social support. Social Problems, 52: 62–78.
35.
WaltersG.2007. Predicting institutional adjustment with the lifestyle criminality screening from and the Antisocial Features and Aggression Scales of the PAI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88: 99–105.
36.
WaltersG.2006. Risk-appraisal versus self-report in the prediction of criminal justice outcomes: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 33: 279–304.
37.
WaltersG.D.DuncanS.A.GeyerM.D.2003. Predicting disciplinary adjustment in inmates undergoing forensic evaluation: A direct comparison of the PCL-R and the PAI. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 14: 382–393.
38.
WangE.RogersR.GilesG.DiamondP.Herrington-WangL.TaylorE.1997. A pilot study of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in corrections: Assessment of malingering, suicide risk, and aggression in male inmates. Behavioral Science and the Law, 15: 469–482.
39.
WebsterC.D.DouglasK.S.EavesD.HartS.D.1997. HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (version 2), Burnaby, BC, , Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
40.
WormithJ.S.OlverM.E.2002. Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity, and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29: 447–471.
