Ultra-low cycle fatigue (ULCF) tests of corroded steel specimens were conducted to illustrate the effects of corrosion on the ULCF properties and fracture mechanism of structural steel. Fatigue crack initiation and propagation process and fracture morphology were observed respectively. The results indicate that the ULCF fracture life of corroded specimens decreases more with increasing surface roughness. The crack-initiation life of corroded specimens is less than half of the fracture life. With corrosion degree increases, the area of the ULCF crack propagation zone expands observably, where it gets harder to find dimples, indicating a transition from ductile to brittle fracture mode.
MillerDK.Lessons learned from the Northridge earthquake. Eng Struct. 1998; 20 (4 – 6): 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00031-X
2.
WatanabeESugiuraKNagataK. Performances and damages to steel structures during the 1995 hyogoken-nanbu earthquake. Eng Struct. 1998; 20: 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00029-1
3.
Subcommittee on investigation of seismic damage of steel structure. Investigation of causes of damage to steel structure on Hanshin-Awaji earthquake disaster. Proc JSCE. 2000; 64: 17–30. (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.2000.647_17
4.
KuwamuraHAkiyamaH.Brittle fracture under repeated high stresses. J Constr Steel Res. 1994; 29: 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974x(94)90054-x
5.
KuwamuraH.Transition between fatigue and ductile fracture in steel. J Struct Eng. 1997; 123: 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1997)123:7(864)
6.
KuwamuraHYamamotoK.Ductile crack as trigger of brittle fracture in steel. J Struct Eng. 1997; 123: 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1997)123:6(729)
7.
GeHFujieWTajimaR.Experimental verification of an evaluation method for predicting the ductile crack initiation in steel structures. J Struct Eng A. 2009; 55A: 617–628. https://doi.org/10.11532/structcivil.55A.617
GeHKangLHayamiK.Recent research developments in ductile fracture of steel bridge structures. J Earthq Tsunami. 2013; 07: 1350021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431113500218
10.
TateishiKHanjiTMinamiK.A prediction model for extremely low cycle fatigue strength of structural steel. Int J Fatigue. 2007; 29: 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.08.001
11.
TateishiKChenTHanjiT.Extremely low cycle fatigue assessment method for un-stiffened cantilever steel columns. J Struct Eng A. 2008; 64: 288–296. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceja.64.288
12.
TateishiKChenTHanjiT.A new local strain based approach to low cycle fatigue assessment of welded joint. J Struct Eng. 2006; 13: 73–81. https://doi.org/10.11273/jssc1994.13.52_73
13.
KuwamuraHTakagiN.Similitude law of prefracture hysteresis of steel members. J Struct Eng. 2004; 130 (5): 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:5(752)
14.
XueL.A unified expression for low cycle fatigue and extremely low cycle fatigue and its implication for monotonic loading. Int J Fatigue. 2008; 30: 1691–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.004
LiuYJiaLJGeHB. Ductile-fatigue transition fracture mode of welded T-joints under quasi-static cyclic large plastic strain loading. Eng Fract Mech. 2017; 176: 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.02.018
17.
LiaoYH.Research on ultra low cycle fatigue properties and fracture mechanism of steel bridge welded joint [Ma.Sc. Dissertation]. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University; 2018.
18.
AlmusallamAA.Effect of degree of corrosion on the properties of reinforcing steel bars. Constr Build Mater. 2001; 15: 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00009-5
19.
DuYGClarktLAChanAHC.Effect of corrosion on ductility of reinforcing bars. Mag Concr Res. 2005; 57: 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2005.57.7.407
ApostolopoulosCA.Mechanical behavior of corroded reinforcing steel bars S500s tempcore under low cycle fatigue. Constr Build Mater. 2007; 21: 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.008
23.
ZhangWSongXGuX. Tensile and fatigue behavior of corroded rebars. Constr Build Mater. 2012; 34: 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.071
24.
WangYXuSWangH. Predicting the residual strength and deformability of corroded steel plate based on the corrosion morphology. Constr Build Mater. 2017; 152: 777–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.035
25.
XuSZhangZQinG.Study on the seismic performance of corroded H-shaped steel columns. Eng Struct. 2019; 191: 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.037
26.
GathimbaNKitaneY.Effect of surface roughness on tensile ductility of artificially corroded steel plates. J Constr Steel Res. 2021; 176: 106392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106392
27.
SongFYXieX.Effect analysis of corrosion on low cycle fatigue behavior of structural steel. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci). 2018; 52: 2285–2294. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2018.12.006
28.
KurodaM.Extremely low cycle fatigue life prediction based on a new cumulative fatigue damage model. Int J Fatigue. 2002; 24: 699–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00170-0
