The combined effects of solidification microstructure refining scale and T6 heat treatment conditions on corrosion behaviour and Vickers microhardness of an Al–3 wt-% Cu–0.5 wt-% Mg alloy were studied. Then, representative samples having quite distinct primary dendritic spacings were solution treated at 495°C for 3 h and artificially aged at 200°C during different times. It was found that the feature of finer solidification microstructure having higher corrosion current density and higher microhardness can be inherited to subsequent T6 heat treatments. In contrast to the as-cast condition, the aging times of 0.5 and 1 h were shown to promote lower corrosion rates without corrosion occurring at the central region of Al-rich matrix. On the other hand, the aging time of 3 h led to a significant decrease in both the corrosion resistance and the microhardness. Finally, a comparative analysis with other works from the literature was also conducted.
GuanRTieD.A review on grain refinement of aluminum alloys: progresses, challenges and prospects. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett). 2017; 30: 409–432. doi: 10.1007/s40195-017-0565-8
2.
CochardAZhuKJouliéS. Natural aging on Al-Cu-Mg structural hardening alloys – investigation of two historical duralumins for aeronautics. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017; 690: 259–269. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.003
LiSZhangJYangJ. Influence of Mg contents on aging precipitation behavior of Al–3.5 Cu–xMg Alloy. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett). 2014; 27: 107–114. doi: 10.1007/s40195-014-0033-7
5.
BirbilisNBuchheitRG.Electrochemical characteristics of intermetallic phases in aluminum alloys an experimental survey and discussion. J Electrochem Soc. 2005; 152: B140–B151. doi: 10.1149/1.1869984
6.
WangSCStarinkMJ.Precipitates and intermetallic phases in precipitation hardening Al–Cu–Mg–(Li) based alloys. Int Mater Rev. 2005; 50: 193–215. doi: 10.1179/174328005X14357
7.
ObispoHMMurrLEArrowoodRM. Copper deposition during the corrosion of aluminum alloy 2024 in sodium chloride solutions. J Mater Sci. 2000; 35: 3479–3495. doi: 10.1023/A:1004840908494
8.
LiJFZiqiaoZNaJ. Localized corrosion mechanism of 2×××-series Al alloy containing S (Al2CuMg) and θ′(Al2Cu) precipitates in 4.0% NaCl solution at pH 6.1. Mater Chem Phys. 2005; 91: 325–329. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.11.034
9.
LacroixLRessierLBlancC. Combination of AFM, SKPFM, and SIMS to study the corrosion behavior of S-phase particles in AA2024-T351. J Electrochem Soc. 2008; 155: C131–C137. doi: 10.1149/1.2833315
10.
BirbilisNCavanaughMBuchheitRG.Electrochemical behavior and localized corrosion associated with Al7Cu2Fe particles in aluminum alloy 7075-T651. Corros Sci. 2006; 48: 4202–4215. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.02.007
11.
ZluticaninBDuricSJordovicB. Characterization of microstructure and properties of Al–Cu–Mg alloy. J Min Metall B. 2003; 39: 509–526. doi: 10.2298/JMMB0304509Z
12.
BarrosASCollyerMNSilvaAP. Examination of thermal parameters. primary dendritic spacings and microhardness of a horizontally solidified Al–Cu–Mg ternary alloy. Def Diff Forum. 2017; 379: 133–139. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.379.133
13.
GhoshKSHilalMDBoseS.Corrosion behavior of 2024 Al–Cu–Mg alloy of various tempers. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2013; 23: 3215–3227. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62856-3
14.
BarrosACruzCSilvaAP. Horizontally solidified Al–3 wt% Cu–(0.5 wt% Mg) alloys: tailoring thermal parameters, microstructure. microhardness, and corrosion behavior. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett). 2019; 32: 695–709. doi: 10.1007/s40195-018-0852-z
15.
SouzaFACostaMOMagnoIA. Investigation on microstructural and microhardness evolution in as-cast and T6/heat-treated samples of a horizontally solidified AlSiCu alloy. J Mater Res Technol. 2019; 8: 5046–5052. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.054
16.
ChenRXuQGuoH. Correlation of solidification microstructure refining scale. Mg composition and heat treatment conditions with mechanical properties in Al: 7S), i-Mg cast aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A.2017; 685: 391–402. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.051
17.
CostaTADiasMGomesLG. Effect of solution time in T6 heat treatment on microstructure and hardness of a directionally solidified Al–Si–Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2016; 683: 485–494. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.099
18.
SamuelAMGauthierJSamuelFH.Microstructural aspects of the dissolution and melting of Al2 Cu phase in Al–Si alloys during solution heat treatment. Metall Mater Trans A. 1996; 27: 1785–1798. doi: 10.1007/BF02651928
19.
LiZSamuelAMSamuelFH. Effect of alloying elements on the segregation and dissolution of CuAl2 phase in Al–Si–Cu 319 alloys. J Mater Sci. 2003; 38: 1203–1218. doi: 10.1023/A:1022857703995
20.
DjurdjevicMStockwellTSokolowskiJ.The effect of strontium on the microstructure of the aluminium-silicon and aluminium-copper eutectics in the 319 aluminium alloy. Int J Cast Metal Res. 1999; 12: 67–73. doi: 10.1080/13640461.1999.11819344
21.
MagnoIABSouzaFVADBarrosADS. Effect of the T6 heat treatment on microhardness of a Directionally solidified aluminum-based 319 alloy. Mater Res. 2017; 20: 662–666. doi: 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-0961
22.
ChenYTNiehGYWangJH. Effects of Cu/Mg ratio and heat treatment on microstructures and mechanical properties of Al–4.6 Cu–Mg–0.5 Ag alloys. Mater Chem Phys. 2015; 162: 764–770. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.07.001
23.
RingerSPHonoK.Microstructural evolution and age hardening in aluminium alloys: atom probe field-ion microscopy and transmission electron microscopy studies. Mater Charact2000; 44: 101–131. doi: 10.1016/S1044-5803(99)00051-0
24.
ParelTSWangSCStarinkMJ.Hardening of an Al–Cu–Mg alloy containing types I and II S phase precipitates. Mater Des. 2010; 31: S2–S5. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.048
RalstonKDBirbilisNCavanaughMK. Role of nanostructure in pitting of Al–Cu–Mg alloys. Elect Acta. 2010; 55: 7834–7842. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.001
RalstonKDBirbilisNWeylandM. The effect of precipitate size on the yield strength-pitting corrosion correlation in Al–Cu–Mg alloys. Acta Mater. 2010; 58: 5941–5948. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.010
29.
ShiHTianZHuT. Simulating corrosion of Al2CuMg phase by measuring ionic currents, chloride concentration and pH. Corros Sci. 2014; 88: 178–186. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.021
30.
LiuDAtkinsonHVKapranosP. Microstructural evolution and tensile mechanical properties of thixoformed high performance aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003; 361: 213–224. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00528-8
García-HernándezJLGaray-ReyesCGGómez-BarrazaIK. Influence of plastic deformation and Cu/Mg ratio on the strengthening mechanisms and precipitation behavior of AA2024 aluminum alloys. J Mater Res Technol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.015.
33.
ShihHCHoNJHuangJC.Precipitation behaviors in Al–Cu–Mg and 2024 aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 1996; 27: 2479–2494. doi: 10.1007/BF02652342
34.
LiuXYPanQLFanX. Microstructural evolution of Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy during homogenization. J Alloys Compd. 2009; 484: 790–794. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.046
35.
WangS-SHuangI-WYangL. Effect of Cu content and aging conditions on pitting corrosion damage of 7xxx series aluminum alloys. J Elect Soc. 2015; 162: C150–C160. doi: 10.1149/2.0301504jes
36.
LiJDangJ.A summary of corrosion properties of Al-rich solid solution and secondary phase particles in Al alloys. Metals (Basel). 2017; 7: 84. doi: 10.3390/met7030084
37.
MagnoIASouzaFACostaMO. Interconnection between the solidification and precipitation hardening processes of an AlSiCu alloy. Mater Sci Technol. 2019; 35: 791–806. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2019.1591028
38.
BarbosaCRMachadoGHAzevedoHM. Tailoring of processing parameters, dendritic microstructure, Si/intermetallic particles and microhardness in as-cast and heat-treated samples of Al7Si0.3Mg alloy. Met Mat Int. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00334-y.
39.
LiuGLinYCZhangXC. Effects of two-stage creep-aging on precipitates of an Al–Cu–Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014; 614: 45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.014
40.
LinYCLiuGChenMS. Corrosion resistance of a two-stage stress-aged Al–Cu–Mg alloy: effects of stress-aging temperature. J Alloys Compd. 2016; 657: 855–865. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.114
41.
LinYCLiuGChenMS. Corrosion resistance of a two-stage stress-aged Al–Cu–Mg alloy: effects of external stress. J Alloys Compd. 2016; 661: 221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.173
42.
LinYCJiangYQXiaYC. Effects of creep-aging processing on the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of an Al–Cu–Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014; 605: 192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.055
