This paper evaluates the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) effect in gasohol E-10 and E-85 of X-70 experimental Ni-microalloyed steel, with different aging treatments (4-12 h at 600°C). The tension tests show that for all treatment periods, the samples tensile strength and elongation increase, with the largest increment exhibited by the samples undergoing 4 and 6 h of aging treatment. Microstructural analysis showed that the microstructure remains unchanged, the increase in tensile strength in the steel is directly related to the precipitation kinetics. The slow strain rate test (SSRT) shows that the steel under all conditions presents no susceptibility to SCC, thus reducing the area ranging from 83% to 90%, with predominantly ductile fractures. The results of the polarisation tests showed no signs of pitting corrosion, as well as a low corrosion rate for both media under study.
CaoLFrankelaGSSridharN.Effect of chloride on stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of carbon steel in simulated fuel grade ethanol. Electrochim Acta. 2013; 104: 255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.112
2.
SinghR.Ethanol corrosion in pipelines. Mater Performance. 2009; 48: 53–55.
3.
SridharN.Study examines ethanol pipelines for cracking potential. Mater Performance. 2007; 46: 18.
4.
CanterleJOBMoraesPMStrohaeckerTREvaluation of the steel API X70 embrittlement in different ethanol environments. NACE International. 2016: 6–10.
5.
BeaversJSridharN.Effects of steel microstructure and ethanol-gasoline blend ratio on SCC of ethanol pipelines, NACE, 2009.
6.
BreitenbachJORenckTSMoraesPMEvaluation of stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of the API 5L X70 steel in corn and sugar cane ethanol environments, in ASME 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Newfoundland, Canada, 2015.
7.
BreithenbachJORenckTSKwietniewskiCEFEvaluation of the notch influence on the stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of the API 5L X70 steel in ethanol. Corrosion. 2014; 70 (9): 907–914. doi: 10.5006/1210
8.
MorenoJLopezVMDorantesHJPrecipitation hardening in Al-4%Cu-0.5% Mg-based alloys modified with Ag additions. Scientia et Technica. 2007; 36: 959–963.
9.
QiongLWawnerFE.Characterization of a cubic phase in an Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy. J Mater Sci. 1997; 32: 5363–5370. doi: 10.1023/A:1018675029786
10.
GladmanT.The physical metallurgy of microalloyed steels. Institute of Materials. 2002; 263-316: 81–103.
11.
TamuraIOuchiCTanakaT. Thermomechanical processing of high strength low alloy steels. Oxford: Butterworths; 1988.
12.
RasouliDKhamenehSAkbarzadehA. Effect of cooling rate on the microstructure and mechanical properties of microalloyed forging steel. Mater Sci Eng. 2008; 206: 11365–19466.
13.
PickeringFB.Physical metallurgy and the design of steels. London: Applied Science; 1978.
14.
ZhongP.Microstructure and mechanical properties in isothermal tempering of high Co-Ni secondary hardening ultrahigh strength steel. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2007; 14: 292–295. doi: 10.1016/S1006-706X(08)60097-7
15.
ASTM E 8M Standard. Test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2012.
16.
ASTM G129-00. Standard practice for slow strain rate testing to evaluate the susceptibility of metallic materials to environmentally assisted cracking. ASTM International, 2013.
17.
[17] D 4806 Standard Specification for Denatured Fuel Ethanol for Blending with Gasolines for Use as Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel. In: ASTM International, 2001.
WangWShanYYangK.Study of high strength pipeline steels with different microstructures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009; 502: 38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.10.042
20.
TongMWVenkatsuryaPKCZhouWHStructure-mechanical property relationship in a high strength microalloyed steel with low yield ratio: The effect of tempering temperature. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014; 609: 209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.05.004
21.
ParkJLeeYK.Nb(C,N) precipitation kinetics in the bainite region of a low-carbon Nb-microalloyed steel. Scripta Mater. 2007; 57: 109–112. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.03.041
22.
MichaudPDelagnesDLamesleP. The effect of the addition of alloying elements on carbide precipitation and mechanical properties in 5% chromium martensite steels. Acta Mater. 2007; 55: 4877–4889. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.004
23.
ShinJHJeongJSLeeJW.Microstructural evolution and the variation of tensile behavior after aging heat treatment of precipitation hardened martensitic steel. Mater Charact. 2015; 99: 230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.11.024
24.
Dae-BumPMoo-YoungHJae-HyeokSStrengthening mechanism of hot rolled Ti and Nb microalloyed HSLA steels containing Mo and W with various coiling temperature. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013; 560: 528–534. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.098
25.
XuGGanXMaGThe development of Ti-alloyed high strength microalloy steel. Mater Des. 2010; 31: 2891–2896. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.032
26.
Vargas-AristaBHallenJAlbiterA.Effect of artificial aging on the microstructure of weldment on API 5L X-52 steel pipe. Mater Charact. 2007; 58: 721–729. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.11.004
27.
MichaudPDelagnesDLamesleP. The effect of the addition of alloying elements on carbide precipitation and mechanical properties in 5% chromium martensite steels. Acta Mater. 2007; 55: 4877–4889. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.004
28.
ZhangKZhangMHGuoZHA new effect of retained austenite on ductility enhancement in high-strength quenching–partitioning–tempering martensitic steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011; 528: 8486–8491. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.049
29.
LehtoPRemesHSaukkonenTInfluence of grain size distribution on the Hall-Petch relationship of welded structural steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014; 592 (13): 28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.094
SivaramanVSankaranSVijayaraghavanL.Effect of cutting parameters on cutting force and surface roughness during machining microalloyed steels: comparison between ferrite-pearlite, tempered martensite and ferrite-bainite-martensite microstructures. J Eng Manufacture. 2016; 232: 1–10.
32.
ZhouWHChallaVSAGuoHStructure-mechanical property relationship in a low carbon Nb-Cu microalloyed steel processed through a three-step heat treatment: The effect of tempering process. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015; 620: 454–462. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.079
33.
SamusawaIShiotaniK.Development of carbon steel for pipe resistant to stress corrosion cracking in fuel grade ethanol, NACE International, Corrosion, 7173, 2016.
34.
HernándezKJChacón NavaJGAbatalM. Stress corrosion cracking study in biofuels. ECS Trans.2017; 76: 171–176. doi: 10.1149/07601.0171ecst
35.
MoyoFVan der MerweW.Effects of water on the SCC of low carbon steel in ethanolic media. Anti-Corros Method M. 2016; 63: 9–13. doi: 10.1108/ACMM-07-2014-1413
36.
MendozaRHuanteJCamachoVDevelopment of an API 5L X-70 grade steel for sour gas resistance pipeline application. J Mater Eng Perform. 1999; 8 (5): 549–555. doi: 10.1007/s11665-999-0008-4
37.
KwintaGKaraSKalandykBMicrostructure examinations in corners of the low-carbon steel slabs from continuous caster machine. Arch Metall Mater. 2016; 61 (4): 2051–2056. doi: 10.1515/amm-2016-0330
38.
RangelMGonzalez-RodriguezJGSernaSStress corrosion cracking of X-80 pipeline steel in bioethanol. J Adv Electrochem. 2016; 2 (2): 89–93.
39.
MaldonadoJGSridharN.SCC of carbon steel in fuel ethanol service: effect of corrosion potential and ethanol processing source, NACE International, 07574, 2007.
40.
SamusawaIShiotaniK.Influence and role of ethanol minor constituents of fuel grade ethanol on corrosion behavior of carbon steel. Corros Sci. 2015; 90: 266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.10.020
41.
JonesH.Principles and prevention of corrosion. Mc Millan; 1992.
42.
SamusawaIShiotaniK.Development of carbon steel for pipe resistant to stress corrosion cracking in fuel grade Ethanol, NACE International, Corrosion, 7173, 2016.
43.
ÁvilaJGenescaJ.Más allá de la herrumbre I, Mexico, D. F., 1987.
44.
SedriksAJ.Corrosion of stainless steel. New York (NY): John Wiley; 1996.
