This paper explains developing an agent-based computer model to predict the corrosion of steel bars in the high alkaline environment in concrete. Modelling started with specific assumptions about ‘agents’, how they interact and how the population changes over time. A simulation approach, employing agent-based modelling, was formulated and corrosion of steel in the alkaline environment of concrete pore solution, with different chloride concentrations, was simulated. The electrochemical behaviour of steel in a chloride-contaminated concrete pore solution was also experimentally examined. Results of the simulations and the experiments were in good agreement.
DittoWMunakataT.Principles and applications of chaotic systems. Commun ACM. 1995; 38 (11): 96–102.
9.
GroysmanA.Corrosion problems and solutions in old refining and petrochemical industry. Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
10.
RindD.Complexity and climate. Science. 1999; 284: 105–107.
11.
MittalSDialloSTolkA.Emergent behavior in complex systems engineering: a modeling and simulation approach. Wiley; 2018.
12.
WilenskyURandW.An introduction to agent-based modeling. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2015. p. 482.
13.
BonabeauE.Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99 (3): 7280–7287.
14.
LaubenbacherRJarrahASMortveitHA mathematical formalism for agent-based modeling. In: MeyersR, editor. Computational complexity. New York (NY): Springer; 2012. p. 1–23.
15.
EpsteinJMAxtellRL.Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1996.
16.
AxelrodR.The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1997.
17.
RumbaughJrBlahaMrLorensenW. Object-oriented modeling and design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1990.
18.
BorrillPLTesfatsionL.Agent-based modeling: the tight mathematics for the social sciences?. Ames (IA): Iowa State University; 2010.
19.
RailsbackSFGrimmV.Agent-based and individual-based modeling: a practical introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2012. p. 352.
20.
WolframS.Cellular automata and complexity: collected papers. Westview Press; 1994.
21.
di CaprioDStafiejJ.Simulations of passivation phenomena based on discrete lattice gas automata. Electrochim Acta. 2010; 55: 3884–3890.
22.
di CaprioDStafiejJ.The role of adsorption in passivation phenomena modelled by discrete lattice gas automata. Electrochim Acta. 2011; 56: 3963–3968.
23.
Cordoba-TorresPNogueiraRPMirandaLDCellular automaton simulation of a simple corrosion mechanism: mesoscopic heterogeneity versus macroscopic homogeneity. Electrochim Acta. 2001; 46: 2975–2989.
24.
ChenHChenYZhangJ.Cellular automaton modeling on the corrosion/oxidation mechanism of steel in liquid metal environment. Prog Nucl Energ. 2008; 50: 587–593.
25.
StafiejJdi CaprioDBartosikL.Corrosion-passivation processes in a cellular automata based simulation study. J Supercomput. 2013; 65 (2): 697–709.
26.
MalkiBBarouxB.Computer simulation of the corrosion pit growth. Corros Sci. 2005; 47: 171–182.
27.
Van der WeeënPZimerAMPereiraECModeling pitting corrosion by means of a 3D discrete stochastic model. Corros Sci. 2014; 82: 133–144.
28.
PidapartiRMFangLPalakalMJ.Computational simulation of multi-pit corrosion process in materials. Comp Mater Sci. 2008; 41: 255–265.
29.
LiLLiXDongCComputational simulation of metastable pitting of stainless steel. Electrochim Acta. 2009; 54: 6389–6395.
30.
MeakinPJossangTFederJ.Simple passivation and depassivation model for pitting corrosion. Phys Rev E. 1993; 48 (4): 2906–2916.
31.
ParunakHDSavitRRioloRL.Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: a case study and users’ guide. In Multi-agent systems and Agent-based Simulation (MABS'98); Paris; 1998.
32.
WilenskyU.NetLogo. Evanston (IL): Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University; 1999. Available from: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo.
BliksteinPAbrahamsonDWilenskyU.NetLogo: where we are, where we're going. Proceedings of the annual meeting of Interaction Design and Children; Boulder (CO); 2005.
35.
PapertS.Mindstorms. New York (NY): Basic Books; 1980.
36.
ASTM, A615: Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement; 2014.
37.
PoursaeeAHanssonCM.Reinforcing steel passivation in mortar and pore solution. Cement Concrete Res. 2007; 37: 1127–1133.
38.
PoursaeeA.Automatic system for monitoring corrosion of steel in concrete. Adv Eng Softw. 2009; 40 (11): 1179–1182.
AtkinsPPaulaJ.Atkins’ physical chemistry. New York (NY): W. H. Freeman and Company; 2006.
42.
LiLSagüésAA.Chloride corrosion threshold of reinforcing steel in alkaline solutions—open-circuit immersion tests. Corrosion. 2001; 57 (1): 19–28.
43.
FigueiraRBSadovskiAMeloAPChloride threshold value to initiate reinforcement corrosion in simulated concrete pore solutions: The influence of surface finishing and pH. Constr Build Mater. 2017; 141: 183–200.
