An attempt has been made to investigate the evolution of intergranular corrosion (IGC) resistance of HR3C heat-resistant austenitic stainless steel. The double-loop electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation (DL-EPR) tests were conducted to evaluate the IGC resistance of HR3C steel. The results show that the side peaks can be observed in active–passive region of DL-EPR curves due to inhomogeneous distribution of the chromium dissolved in matrix. The variation of the degree of sensitisation (DOS) during sensitising at 800°C can be divided into three regions (sensitisation dominant region, desensitisation dominant region and equilibrium region). When HR3C steel is sensitised at 800°C for over 24 h, the equilibrium state in DOS can be reached. Simultaneously, the IGC morphologies after DL-EPR tests can correlate well with the DOS. On the basis of the equilibrium state in DOS, proper heat treatments and corrosion protection measures can be taken to avoid IGC of HR3C steel.
ChengYDuHWeiY. Metadynamic recrystallization behavior and workability characteristics of HR3C austenitic heat-resistant stainless steel with processing map. J Mater Process Technol. 2016; 235: 134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.026
2.
ArutunowADarowickiK. DEIS evaluation of the relative effective surface area of AISI 304 stainless steel dissolution process in conditions of intergranular corrosion. Electrochim Acta. 2009; 54 (3): 1034–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.08.045
3.
AydoğduGAydinolM. Determination of susceptibility to intergranular corrosion and electrochemical reactivation behaviour of AISI 316L type stainless steel. Corros Sci. 2006; 48 (11): 3565–3583. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.01.003
4.
SrinivasanNKainVBirbilisN. Near boundary gradient zone and sensitization control in austenitic stainless steel. Corros Sci. 2015; 100: 544–555. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.08.027
5.
OkadaHIgarashiMYamamotoS. Long-term service experience with advanced austenitic alloys in eddystone power station. ASME 2007 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference; 2007. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p. 181–188.
6.
PengBZhangHHongJ. Effect of aging on the impact toughness of 25Cr–20Ni–Nb–N steel. Mater Sci Eng. 2010; 527 (7-8): 1957–1961. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.12.039
7.
ZhaoJWangHChengCQ. Precipitation in 25Cr20NiNbN austenitic steel after ageing at 750°C. Mater High Temp. 2015; 32 (5): 461–467. doi: 10.1179/0960340915Z.000000000119
8.
IsedaAOkadaHSembaHA. Long term creep properties and microstructure of SUPER304H, TP347HFG and HR3C for A-USC boilers. Energy Mater. 2007; 2 (4): 199–206. doi: 10.1179/174892408X382860
9.
BaiXPanJChenG. Effect of high temperature aging on microstructure and mechanical properties of HR3C heat resistant steel. Mater Sci Technol. 2014; 30 (2): 205–210. doi: 10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000347
10.
ChowdhuryPGuchhaitSMitraP. Understanding the effect of uniaxial tensile strain on the early stages of sensitization in AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Chem Phys. 2015; 155: 217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.02.030
11.
ČíhalVHubáčkováJKubelkaJ. The potential polarization method for the evaluation of martensite-austenite stainless steels. Mater Chem Phys. 1984; 11 (3): 279–293. doi: 10.1016/0254-0584(84)90062-2
12.
OsozawaKBohnenkampKEngellH.-J. Potentiostatic study on the intergranular corrosion of an austenitic chromium-nickel stainless steel. Corros Sci. 1966; 6 (9): 421–433. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(66)80014-8
13.
SedriksA. Plenary lecture-1986: effects of alloy composition and microstructure on the passivity of stainless steels. Corrosion. 1986; 42 (7): 376–389. doi: 10.5006/1.3584918
14.
KinaAYSouzaVMTavaresSSM. Microstructure and intergranular corrosion resistance evaluation of AISI 304 steel for high temperature service. Mater Charact. 2008; 59 (5): 651–655. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.04.004
15.
YuXChenSWangL. Simulation of recrystallization in cold worked stainless steel and its effect on chromium depletion by cellular automaton. Comput Mater Sci. 2009; 46 (1): 66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.02.008
16.
YuXChenSLiuY. A study of intergranular corrosion of austenitic stainless steel by electrochemical potentiodynamic reactivation, electron back-scattering diffraction and cellular automaton. Corros Sci. 2010; 52 (6): 1939–1947. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.02.015
17.
ChungPSzklarska-SmialowskaS. The effect of heat treatment on the degree of sensitization of type 304 stainless steel. Corrosion. 1981; 37 (1): 39–50. doi: 10.5006/1.3593836
18.
ASTM A262 A. Standard practices for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in austenitic stainless steels. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2002.
19.
Abou-ElazmAAbdel-KarimRElmahallawiI. Correlation between the degree of sensitization and stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of type 304H stainless steel. Corros Sci. 2009; 51 (2): 203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.10.015
20.
MuraleedharanPGnanamoorthyJBRodriguezP. Comparative study: degree of sensitization and intergranular stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of type 304 stainless steel. Corrosion. 1996; 52 (10): 790–800. doi: 10.5006/1.3292072
21.
AhnM-KKwonH-SLeeJ-H. Predicting susceptibility of alloy 600 to intergranular stress corrosion cracking using a modified electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation test. Corrosion. 1995; 51 (6): 441–449. doi: 10.5006/1.3293610
22.
DayalRParvathavarthiniNRajB. Influence of metallurgical variables on sensitisation kinetics in austenitic stainless steels. Int Mater Rev. 2005; 50 (3): 129–155. doi: 10.1179/174328005X14348
