This work aims to investigate the effect of chitosan powders on the mechanical, morphological and thermal behaviour of nitrile rubber (NBR). The chitosan content has been varied between 0 and 15 phr. NBR was initially loaded with chitosan using a two-roll mixing mill along with compounding agents and then cured by compression moulding using accelerated sulphur vulcanisation strategy. The results indicate that the mechanical properties of NBR increase at a critical loading of chitosan (12 phr). A new Chitosan Efficacy Index has been proposed to understand the effect of chitosan loading on overall mechanical properties. Morphological examinations by using scanning electron microscopy pointed towards the presence of voids and discontinuities within the fractured surfaces of the composites. Thermogravimetric analysis and water absorption studies have also been carried out to complement the results from the investigation of mechanical properties.
KongL, LiF, WangF, In situ assembly of SiO2 nanodots/layered double hydroxide nanocomposite for the reinforcement of solution-polymerized butadiene styrene rubber/butadiene rubber. Compos Sci Technol. 2018; 158: 9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.036.
2.
HernándezFE, MedinaC, MoragaG, Correlation between mechanical and microstructural properties of vulcanized polyisoprene, polychloroprene, and nitrile-butadiene rubber subjected to accelerated thermal aging. J Elastomers Plast. 2019; 51 ( 6 ): 493–511. doi: 10.1177/0095244318798171.
3.
AziziH, FaghihiJ.Effect of nanoclay on mechanical and thermal properties of triblock SBS (styrene–butadiene–styrene) and its binary blend nanocomposites: comparison between polyethylene and polystyrene. Plast Rubber Compos. 2018; 47 ( 10 ): 429–437. doi: 10.1080/14658011.2018.1515286.
4.
ShafeeqVH, UnnikrishnanG.Experimental and theoretical evaluation of mechanical, thermal and morphological features of EVA-millable polyurethane blends. J Polym Res. 2020; 27 ( 3 ). doi: 10.1007/s10965-020-2027-7.
5.
PawarVS, PantRS, GuruprasadPJ.Experimental and numerical studies on the effect of elongation rate and temperature on the mechanical behaviour of high strength NBR. Plast Rubber Compos. 2019; 48 ( 7 ): 281–292. doi: 10.1080/14658011.2019.1611254.
6.
LinharesFN, GabrielCFS, de SousaAMF, Mechanical and rheological properties of nitrile rubber/fluoromica composites. Appl Clay Sci. 2018; 162 ( May ): 165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.06.004.
SoratanaK, RasutisD, AzarabadiH, Guayule as an alternative source of natural rubber: A comparative life cycle assessment with Hevea and synthetic rubber. J Clean Prod. 2017; 159: 271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.070.
12.
Ali ShahA, HasanF, ShahZ, Biodegradation of natural and synthetic rubbers: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2013; 83: 145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.05.004.
13.
OoiZX, IsmailH, Abu BakarA.Synergistic effect of oil palm ash filled natural rubber compound at low filler loading. Polym Test. 2013; 32 ( 1 ): 38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.09.007.
14.
RiyajanSA, SangwanW, LeejarkpaiT.Synthesis and properties of a novel epoxidised natural rubber-g-cassava starch polymer and its use as an impact strengthening agent. Plast Rubber Compos. 2016; 45 ( 6 ): 277–285. doi: 10.1080/14658011.2016.1186860.
15.
RameshA, RamuK, Ali BaigMA, Influence of fly ash nano filler on the tensile and flexural properties of novel hybrid epoxy nano-composites. Mater Today Proc. 2020; 27 ( 2 ): 1252–1257. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.150.
16.
SaboktakinA, SaboktakinM.Improvements of physical, mechanical and biodegradation properties of polybutadiene rubber insulators by chitosan and silica nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016; 91: 1194–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.078.
17.
XuC, WuW, NieJ, Preparation of carboxylic styrene butadiene rubber/chitosan composites with dense supramolecular network via solution mixing process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2019; 117 ( September 2018 ): 116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.11.014.
18.
MartelliMR, BarrosTT, De MouraMR, Effect of chitosan nanoparticles and pectin content on mechanical properties and water vapor permeability of banana puree films. J Food Sci. 2013; 78 ( 1 ): N98–N104. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.03006.x.
ZakariaZ, Mechanical properties and morphological characterization of PLA/chitosan/epoxidized natural rubber composites. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2013; 2013: 1–7. doi: 10.1155/2013/629092.
21.
AttaranSA, HassanA, WahitMU.Materials for food packaging applications based on bio-based polymer nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2017; 30 ( 2 ): 143–173. doi: 10.1177/0892705715588801.
22.
HabibaU, IslamMS, SiddiqueTA, Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of anionic dyes on chitosan/PVA/Na-titanate/TiO2 composites synthesized by solution casting method. Carbohydr Polym. 2016; 149: 317–331. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.127.
23.
AmriF, HusseinsyahS, HussinK.Mechanical, morphological and thermal properties of chitosan filled polypropylene composites: the effect of binary modifying agents. Compos Part A Appl Sci. Manuf. 2013; 46 ( 1 ): 89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.014.
24.
JohnsJ, RaoV.Mechanical properties and swelling behavior of cross-linked natural rubber/chitosan blends. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2009; 14 ( 6 ): 508–526. doi: 10.1080/10236660903072797.
25.
RiyajanSA, SukhlaaiedW.Effect of chitosan content on gel content of epoxized natural rubber grafted with chitosan in latex form. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013; 33 ( 3 ): 1041–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.11.012.
26.
RinaudoM.Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2006; 31 ( 7 ): 603–632. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001.
27.
El-HefianEA, NasefMM, YahayaAH, Preparation and characterization of chitosan/agar blends: rheological and thermal studies. J Chil Chem Soc. 2010; 55 ( 1 ): 130–136. doi: 10.4067/S0717-97072010000100031.
28.
KhajehsaeidH, ReeseS, ArghavaniJ, Strain and stress concentrations in elastomers at finite deformations: effects of strain-induced crystallization, filler reinforcement, and deformation rate. Acta Mech. 2016; 227 ( 7 ): 1969–1982. doi: 10.1007/s00707-016-1615-4.
29.
LuoZ, Modification of ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate using silica and nitrile butadiene rubber to achieve high thixotropy and low internal stress. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2018; 32 ( 10 ): 1128–1141. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2017.1400801.
30.
ZhaoJ, YangR, IervolinoR, The effect of thermo-oxidation on the continuous stress relaxation behavior of nitrile rubber. Polym Degrad Stab. 2015; 115: 32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.02.013.
31.
MondalS, KhastgirD.Evaluation of carbon black distribution in different phases of compatible blend of EVA/NBR through electrical, mechanical and morphological test. Polym Test. 2017; 59: 404–413. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.03.002.
32.
BansodND, DasC.Studies on mechanical, rheological, thermal and morphological properties of in situ silica-filled butadiene rubber composites. Plast Rubber Compos. 2018; 47 ( 8 ): 345–351. doi: 10.1080/14658011.2018.1492272.
33.
PohBT, IsmailH, TanKS.Effect of filler loading on tensile and tear properties of SMR L/ENR 25 and SMR L/SBR blends cured via a semi-efficient vulcanization system. Polym Test. 2002; 21 ( 7 ): 801–806. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00014-4.
34.
FaezR, SchusterRH, De PaoliMA.A conductive elastomer based on EPDM and polyaniline: II. Effect of the crosslinking method. Eur Polym J. 2002; 38 ( 12 ): 2459–2463. doi: 10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00133-7.
35.
BahruddinB, AhmadA, PrayitnoA, Morphology and mechanical properties of palm based fly ash reinforced dynamically vulcanized natural rubber/polypropylene blends. Procedia Chem. 2012; 4: 146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2012.06.021.
36.
ShanibaV, SreejithMP, AparnaKB, Mechanical and thermal behavior of styrene butadiene rubber composites reinforced with silane-treated peanut shell powder. Polym Bull. 2017; 74 ( 10 ): 3977–3994. doi: 10.1007/s00289-017-1931-4.
37.
SureshSS, MohantyS, NayakSK.Effect of nitrile rubber on mechanical, thermal, rheological and flammability properties of recycled blend. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019; 123: 370–378. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.01.025.
38.
RobertsonCG, TunnicliffeLB, MaciagL, Characterizing distributions of tensile strength and crack precursor size to evaluate filler dispersion effects and reliability of rubber. Polymers (Basel). 2020; 12 ( 203 ): 1–15. doi: 10.3390/polym12010203.
39.
KudoriSNI, IsmailH.The effects of filler contents and particle sizes on properties of Green kenaf-filled natural rubber latex foam. Cell Polym. 2020; 39 ( 2 ): 57–68. doi: 10.1177/0262489319890201.
40.
ThuongNT, DungTA, YusofNH, Controlling the size of silica nanoparticles in filler nanomatrix structure of natural rubber. Polymer (Guildf). 2020; 195 ( March ). doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122444.
41.
CunhaAG, FernandesSCM, FreireCSR, ‘What is the real value of chitosan's surface energy?’. Biomacromolecules. 2008; 9 ( 2 ): 610–614. doi: 10.1021/bm701199 g.
42.
KamalM, SharmaCS, UpadhyayaP, Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) nanoparticle filled polypropylene: effect of particle surface treatment on mechanical, thermal, and morphological performance of composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2012; 124 ( 4 ): 2649–2656. doi: 10.1002/app.35319.
43.
DikobeDG, LuytAS.Comparative study of the morphology and properties of PP/LLDPE/wood powder and MAPP/LLDPE/wood powder polymer blend composites. Express Polym Lett. 2010; 4 ( 11 ): 729–741. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.88.
44.
YuP, HeH, JiangC, Enhanced oil resistance and mechanical properties of nitrile butadiene rubber/lignin composites modified by epoxy resin. J. Appl Polym Sci. 2016; 133 ( 4 ): 1–10. doi: 10.1002/app.42922.
45.
Xuan VietC, HanafiI, RashidAA, Effect of filler surface treatment on the properties of recycled high-density polyethylene/(natural rubber)/(kenaf powder) biocomposites. J Vinyl Addit Technol. 2009; 21 ( 2 ): 129–133. doi: 10.1002/vnl.
46.
BarbosaAQ, da SilvaLFM, AbenojarJ, Toughness of a brittle epoxy resin reinforced with micro cork particles: effect of size, amount and surface treatment. Compos Part B Eng. 2017; 114: 299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.072.
