This study show influence of alkaline treatment on sisal fiber (SF) in different composites of starch matrices (SM) and cellulose acetate matrices (CAM). SF were modified with an aqueous 0.5M NaOH solution. Composites were prepared in proportion of 3% fiber/matrix (m/m) using casting method. The samples were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy by Attenuated Total Reflection (FTIR-ATR), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis (DMA). Through results obtained in FTIR and TGA, it was possible to verify that alkaline treatment partially removed hemicellulose and SF lignin. With SEM, best fiber/matrix adhesion in composites prepared with modified fiber (TSF) has been proven to change fibre morphology. Through DMA analysis it was possible to observe that after addition of SF and TSF, SM composites showed improvements in mechanical properties, while TGA showed an increase in initial temperature of thermal degradation in CAM composites with addition of fiber.
RajakDK, PagarDD, KumarR, Recent progress of reinforcement materials: A comprehensive overview of composite materials. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019; 8: 6354–6374. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.068.
2.
SanjayMR, SiengchinS, ParameswaranpillaiJ, A comprehensive review of techniques for natural fibers as reinforcement in composites: preparation, processing and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019; 207: 108–121. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.083.
KamathSS, SampathkumarD, BennehalliB.A review on natural areca fibre reinforced polymer composite materials. Cienc. e Tecnol. Dos Mater. 2017; 29: 106–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ctmat.2017.10.001.
5.
SiqueiraÉJ, BotaroVR.Luffa cylindrica fibres/vinylester matrix composites: effects of 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic dianhydride surface modification of the fibres and aluminum hydroxide addition on the properties of the composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013; 82: 76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.012.
6.
MarquesMDFV, MeloRP, AraujoRDS, Improvement of mechanical properties of natural fiber-polypropylene composites using successive alkaline treatments. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015; 132: 1–12. doi: 10.1002/app.41710.
7.
MazzantiV, ParianteR, BonannoA, Reinforcing mechanisms of natural fibers in green composites: role of fibers morphology in a PLA/hemp model system. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019; 180: 51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.05.015.
8.
BeltramiLVR, Cristine ScienzaL, ZatteraAJ.Efeito do tratamento alcalino de fibras de Curauá sobre as propriedades de compósitos de matriz biodegradável TT - Effect of the alkaline treatments of Curauá fiber on the properties of biodegradable matrix composites. Polímeros. 2014; 24: 388–394. doi: 10.4322/polimeros.2014.024.
9.
PiresEN, MerliniC, Al-QureshiHA, Efeito do Tratamento Alcalino de Fibras de Juta no Comportamento Mecânico de Compósitos de Matriz Epóxi. Polimeros. 2012; 22: 339–344. doi: 10.1590/S0104-14282012005000053.
FanY, PicchioniF.Modification of starch: a review on the application of “green” solvents and controlled functionalization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020; 241: 116350–116369. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116350.
12.
ChenJ, WangY, LiuJ, Preparation, characterization, physicochemical property and potential application of porous starch: a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020; 148: 1169–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.055.
13.
OgunsonaE, OjogboE, MekonnenT.Advanced material applications of starch and its derivatives. Eur. Polym. J. 2018; 108: 570–581. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.09.039.
Do CarmoKP, De PaivaJMF.Biodegradable films and starch compositions with other materials. Rev. Virtual Quim. 2015; 7: 2377–2386. doi: 10.5935/1984-6835.20150141.
16.
SennaAM, De MenezesAJ, BotaroVR.Estudo da Densidade de Ligações Cruzadas em Géis. Polímeros. 2013; 23: 59–64. doi: 10.1590/S0104-14282012005000078
17.
de FreitasRRM, SennaAM, BotaroVR.Influence of degree of substitution on thermal dynamic mechanical and physicochemical properties of cellulose acetate. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017; 109: 452–458. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.062.
18.
de CamposA, TeodoroKBR, MarconciniJM, Efeito do tratamento das fibras nas propriedades do biocompósito de amido termoplástico/policaprolactona/sisal. Polímeros. 2011; 21: 217–222. doi: 10.1590/s0104-14282011005000039.
19.
GilfillanWN, NguyenDMT, SopadePA, Preparation and characterisation of composites from starch and sugar cane fibre. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012; 40: 45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.02.036.
20.
GuimarãesJL, WypychF, SaulCK, Studies of the processing and characterization of corn starch and its composites with banana and sugarcane fibers from Brazil. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010; 80: 130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.002.
21.
PangC, ShanksRA, DaverF.Characterization of kenaf fiber composites prepared with tributyl citrate plasticized cellulose acetate. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015; 70: 52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.003.
22.
GutiérrezMC, De PaoliM, FelisbertiMI.Cellulose acetate and short curauá fibers biocomposites prepared by large scale processing : reinforcing and thermal insulating properties. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014; 52: 363–372. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.10.054.
23.
GutiérrezMC, De PaoliM, FelisbertiMI.Biocomposites based on cellulose acetate and short curauá fibers: effect of plasticizers and chemical treatments of the fibers. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2012; 43: 1338–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.006.
24.
MohantyAK, WibowoA, MisraM, Effect of process engineering on the performance of natural fiber reinforced cellulose acetate biocomposites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2006; 35: 363–370. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.015.
25.
MelikoğluAY, BilekSE, CesurS.Optimum alkaline treatment parameters for the extraction of cellulose and production of cellulose nanocrystals from apple pomace. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019; 215: 330–337. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.103.
26.
KumarA, NegiYS, ChoudharyV, Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals produced by acid-hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse as agro-waste. J. Mater. Phys. Chem. 2014; 2: 1–8. doi: 10.12691/jmpc-2-1-1.
27.
CésarNR, Pereira-da-silvaMA, BotaroVR, Cellulose nanocrystals from natural fiber of the macrophyte Typha domingensis : extraction and characterization. Cellulose. 2015: 449–460. doi: 10.1007/s10570-014-0533-7.
28.
SunXF, SunRC, SuY, Comparative study of crude and purified cellulose from wheat straw. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004; 52: 839–847. doi: 10.1021/jf0349230.
29.
GaliwangoE, Abdel RahmanNS, Al-MarzouqiAH, Isolation and characterization of cellulose and α-cellulose from date palm biomass waste. Heliyon. 2019; 5: e02937, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02937.
30.
CorradiniE, LottiC, de MedeirosES, Comparative studies of corn thermoplastic starches with different amylose content. Polímeros Ciência e Tecnol. 2005; 15: 268–273. doi: 10.1590/S0104-14282005000400011.
31.
LopezO, GarciaMA, VillarMA, Thermo-compression of biodegradable thermoplastic corn starch films containing chitin and chitosan. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2014; 57: 106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.01.024.
32.
d'AlmeidaJRM, AquinoRCMP, MonteiroSN.Tensile mechanical properties, morphological aspects and chemical characterization of piassava (Attalea funifera) fibers. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006; 37: 1473–1479. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.035.
