Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were incorporated into polyamide 6 in an attempt to enhance notched impact resistance and damping performance. The morphology, mechanical, thermal and viscoelastic properties of different samples were studied. Scanning electron microscopy study indicated a uniform distribution of fine TPU droplets in PA6/TPU blend. Furthermore, well-dispersed CNTs in PA6/TPU matrix and good adhesion of polymer matrix to CNTs were observed. The addition of TPU into PA6 developed a rough fracture surface morphology and increased the notched impact strength equal to 39%, yet declined tensile and flexural resistance. The inclusion of CNTs into PA6/TPU improved mechanical properties comprising tensile, flexural and notched impact strengths as high as 14%, 12% and 16% respectively. The results of dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) indicate: the addition of TPU into PA6 improves damping performance; the inclusion of carbon nanotubes in PA6/TPU enhances both energy storage and glass transition temperature.
BorahJS, KarakN, ChakiTK.Effect of organoclay platelets on morphology and properties of LLDPE/EMA blends. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011; 528: 2820–2830. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.067
2.
MartinsCG, LaroccaNM, PaulDR, Nanocomposites formed from polypropylene/EVA blends. Polymer (Guildf). 2009; 50: 1743–1754. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.01.059
3.
MeinckeO.Mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of carbon-nanotube filled polyamide-6 and its blends with acrylonitrile/butadiene/styrene. Polymer (Guildf). 2004; 45: 739–748. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.013
4.
NayakSK, MohantyS.Poly (trimethylene) terephthalate/m-LLDPE blend nanocomposites: evaluation of mechanical, thermal and morphological behavior. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010; 527: 574–583. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.026
5.
ShieldsRJ, BhattacharyyaD, FakirovS.Oxygen permeability analysis of microfibril reinforced composites from PE/PET blends. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2008; 39: 940–949. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.03.008
6.
ZhangL, ShiC, RheeKY, Properties of Co0.5Ni0.5Fe2O4/carbon nanotubes/polyimide nanocomposites for microwave absorption. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2012; 43: 2241–2248. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.014
7.
LeeJH, MarroquinJ, RheeKY, Cryomilling application of graphene to improve material properties of graphene/chitosan nanocomposites. Compos B Eng. 2013; 45: 682–687. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.011
ZareY.Modeling of tensile modulus in polymer/carbon nanotubes (CNTs) nanocomposites. Synth Met. 2015; 202: 68–72. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.02.002
10.
CastilloFY.Electrical, mechanical, and glass transition behavior of polycarbonate-based nanocomposites with different multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Polymer (Guildf). 2011; 52: 3835–3845. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.06.018
11.
ZareY.Effects of interphase on tensile strength of polymer/CNT nanocomposites by Kelly-Tyson theory. Mech Mater. 2015; 85: 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.02.002
12.
KhanSU, PothnisJR, KimJK.Effects of carbon nanotube alignment on electrical and mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2013; 49: 26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.015
13.
LeHH.Dispersion and distribution of carbon nanotubes in ternary rubber blends. Compos Sci Technol. 2014; 90: 180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.008
14.
TehranAC, Shelesh-NezhadK, BarazandehFJ.Mechanical and thermal properties of TPU-toughened PBT/CNT nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2019; 32: 815–830. doi: 10.1177/0892705718780198
15.
UrquijoJ, DagréouS, Guerrica-EchevarríaG, Morphology and properties of electrically and rheologically percolated PLA/PCL/CNT nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017; 134: 1–10. doi: 10.1002/app.45265
16.
CaoL, DengS, HeZ, Effects of carbon nanotube on mechanical, crystallization, and electrical properties of binary blends of poly (phenylene sulfide) and polyphthalamide. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016; 125 ( 2 ): 927–934. doi: 10.1007/s10973-016-5484-9
17.
OzkocG, BayramG, BayramliE.Effects of olefin-based compatibilizers on the morphology, thermal and mechanical properties of ABS/polyamide-6 blends. J Appl Polym Sci. 2007; 104: 926–935. doi: 10.1002/app.25848
18.
XieT, WuH, BaoW, Enhanced compatibility of PA6/POE blends by POE-g-MAH prepared through ultrasound-assisted extrusion. J Appl Polym Sci. 2010; 118 ( 3 ): 1846–1852.
19.
CastroLDC, OliveiraAD, KerschM, Effect of organoclay incorporation and blending protocol on performance of PA6/ABS nanocomposites compatibilized with SANMA. Polym Eng Sci. 2017; 57: 1147–1154. doi: 10.1002/pen.24493
20.
ZhouS, HuangJ, ZhangQ.Mechanical and tribological properties of polyamide-based composites modified by thermoplastic polyurethane. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2014; 27: 18–34. doi: 10.1177/0892705712439565
21.
WangK.Effects of clay on phase morphology and mechanical properties in polyamide 6/EPDM-g-MA/organoclay ternary nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf). 2014; 48: 2144–2154. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.01.070
22.
KudvaRA, KeskkulaH, PaulDR.Properties of compatibilized nylon 6/ABS blends: part I. Effect of ABS type. Polymer (Guildf). 2000; 41: 225–237. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00105-6
23.
NaderiG, Razavi-NouriM, TaghizadehE, Preparation of thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites based on polyamide-6/polyepichlorohydrin-co-ethylene oxide. Polym Eng Sci. 2011; 51: 278–284. doi: 10.1002/pen.21824
24.
ChenJJ, LiuHY, ZhangGZ, Mechanical properties and thermal behavior of thermoplastic polyurethane toughening polylactide prepared by vane extruder. Appl Mech Mater. 2013; 431: 110–115. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.431.110
LiuXQ, YangW, XieBH, Influence of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the morphology, melting, crystallization and mechanical properties of polyamide 6/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene blends. Mater Des. 2012; 34: 355–362. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.028
ASTM D4065-12. Standard practice for plastics: dynamic mechanical properties: determination and report of procedures. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2012;8(2).
30.
XueY, TangZ, QinM, Improved toughness of poly(ether-block-amide) via melting blending with thermoplastic polyurethane for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019; 136 ( 17 ): 47397–47408. doi: 10.1002/app.47397
31.
MengH, SuiGX, FangPF, Effects of acid- and diamine-modified MWNTs on the mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of polyamide 6. Polymer (Guildf). 2008; 49: 610–620. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.001
GnatowskiA, KoszkulJ.Investigation on PA/PP mixture properties by means of DMTA method. J Mater Process Technol. 2006; 175: 212–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.020
37.
JiangC.Glass transition temperature of amino groups grafted carbon nanotubes reinforced epoxy resin composites: role of strong interphase. Polym Compos. 2018; 39: E1129–E1138. doi: 10.1002/pc.24587
38.
ColemanJN.Reinforcement of polymers with carbon nanotubes. The role of an ordered polymer interfacial region: experiment and modeling. Polym. 2006; 47 ( 26 ): 8556–8561. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.10.014
39.
UjoEM, CarvalhoAJ.Thermal properties of nylon6/ABS polymer blends: compatibilizer effect. J Mater Sci. 2004; 39: 1173–1178. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000013872.86575.36
40.
ZhouR, GaoW, XiaL, The study of damping property and mechanism of thermoplastic polyurethane/phenolic resin through a combined experiment and molecular dynamics simulation. J Mater Sci. 2018; 53: 9350–9362. doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-2218-3
41.
WarrierA.The effect of adding carbon nanotubes to glass/epoxy composites in the fibre sizing and/or the matrix. Compos A. 2010; 41: 532–538. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.001
42.
SabaN.Thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibers reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017; 102: 822–828. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.074
