In this paper, the effect of a toughened epoxy matrix on the damage evolution, energy dissipation, and permanent indentation of composite laminates under out-of-plane (transverse) loading is presented experimentally. The epoxy matrix was toughened by 3% alumina nanoparticles with sizes less than 200 nm. A quasi-static indentation test was exploited to characterise the damage modes and evaluate the dissipation of energy of the composite laminate. The dissipated energy was evaluated as the enclosed area between the loading and unloading curves, while the damage resistance was expressed as the number of delaminations and their size. The results showed that epoxy toughened by alumina nanoparticles, showed an improvement in the damage threshold load by 27.3% and higher ultimate load under indentation. Regarding the damage resistance, the toughened laminates showed lower number of delaminated interfaces and lower projected delamination area than untoughened laminates. This is due to the localised damage under the indenter, the matrix cracks at low indentation energy and fibre breakages occur at high indentation energy.
MazumdarS.Composites manufacturing: materials, product, and process engineering. Florida: CRC Press; 2001.
2.
FuossE, StraznickyPV, PoonC.Effects of stacking sequence on the impact resistance in composite laminates-part 1: parametric study. Compos Struct. 1998;41(1):67–77. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00036-1
3.
AssieAE, EltaherMA, MahmoudFF.The response of viscoelastic-frictionless bodies under normal impact. Int J Mech Sci. 2010;52(3):446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.11.005
4.
OlssonR.Mass criterion for wave controlled impact response of composite plates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact. 2000;31(8):879–887. doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00020-8
5.
WagihA, MaimiP, GonzalezE, Damage sequence in thin-ply composite laminates under out-of-plane loading. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact. 2016;87:66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.010
6.
WagihA, MaimiP, BlancoN, A quasi-static indentation test to elucidate the sequence of damage events in low velocity impacts on composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact. 2016;82:180–189. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.041
7.
WagihA.Response of composite laminates under out-of-plane loading [PhD thesis]. Girona University; 2018.
8.
WagihA, MaimiP, BlancoN, Predictive model for the spherical indentation of composite laminates with finite thickness. Compos Struct. 2016;153:468–477. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.056
9.
AbissetE, DaghiaF, SunX, Interaction of inter-and intralaminar damage in scaled quasi-static indentation tests: part 1experiments. Compos Struct. 2016;136:712–726. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.061
10.
OlssonR.Analytical prediction of damage due to large mass impact on thin ply composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact. 2015;72:184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.005
11.
BailieJ, LeyR, PasrichaA.A summary and review of composite laminate design guidelines. Tech. Rep.; NASA, NAS1-19347 Northrop Grumman-Military Aircraft Systems Division; 1997.
12.
SoutisC.Carbon fiber reinforced plastics in aircraft construction. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;412(1–2):171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.064
13.
PearsonRA.Toughening epoxies using rigid thermoplastic particles – a review. Adv Chem Ser. 1993;233:405–425. doi: 10.1021/ba-1993-0233.ch017
14.
MoritaH, AdachiT, TateishiY, Characterization of impact damage resistance of CF/PEEK and CF/toughened epoxy laminates under low and high velocity impact tests. J Reinf Plast Compos. 1997;16(2):131–143. doi: 10.1177/073168449701600203
15.
VieilleB, CasadoVM, BouvetC.About the impact behavior of woven-ply carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic- and thermosetting-composites: a comparative study. Compos Struct. 2013;101:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.025
16.
Ghasemi NejhadMN, Parvizi-MajidiA.Impact behaviour and damage tolerance of woven carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Composites. 1990;21(2):155–168. doi: 10.1016/0010-4361(90)90008-K
17.
BiboGA, HoggPJ.The role of reinforcement architecture on impact damage mechanisms and post-impact compression behaviour. Journal of Mater Sci. 1996;31(5):1115–1137. doi: 10.1007/BF00353091
GroleauMR, ShiYB, YeeAF, Mode II fracture of composites interlayered with nylon particles. Compos Sci Technol. 1996;56(11):1223–1240. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00080-2
20.
WrightP, FuX, SinclairI, Ultra high resolution computed tomography of damage in notched carbon fiber–epoxy composites. J Compos Mater. 2008;42(19):1993–2002. doi: 10.1177/0021998308092211
21.
FuSY, FengXQ, LaukeB, Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos Part B – Eng. 2008;39(6):933–961. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002
22.
SpanoudakisJ, YoungRJ.Crack-propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxyresin. 2. effect of particle matrix adhesion. J Mater Sci. 1984;19(2):487–496. doi: 10.1007/BF02403235
23.
HsuehCH.Effects of aspect ratios of ellipsoidal inclusions on elastic stress transfer of ceramic composites. J Am Ceram Soc. 1989;72(2):344–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06132.x
24.
SpanoudakisJ, YoungRJ.Crack-propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin. 1. effect of particle-volume fraction and size. J Mater Sci. 1984;19(2):473–486. doi: 10.1007/BF02403234
25.
GaoF, JiaoGQ, LuZX, Mode II delamination and damage resistance of carbon/epoxy composite laminates interleaved with thermoplastic particles. J Compos Mater. 2007;41(1):111–123. doi: 10.1177/0021998306063356
26.
LubineauG, RahamanA.A review of strategies for improving the degradation properties of laminated continuous-fiber/epoxy composites with carbon-based nanoreinforcements. Carbon N Y. 2012;50(7):2377–2395. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.059
27.
ASTM D 6264-98 (Reapproved 2004). Standard test method for measuring damage resistance of fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composite to concentrated quasi-static indentation; 2004.
28.
OlssonR.Engineering method for prediction of impact response and damage in sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mater. 2002;4(1):3–29. doi: 10.1177/1099636202004001192
DaviesG, RobinsonP.Predicting failure by debonding/delamination. AGARD, debonding/delamination of composites. Imperial Coll. of Science and Technology. 1992;28:7–24.
32.
SunXC, WisnomMR, HalletSR.Interaction of inter-and intralaminar damage in scaled quasi-static indentation tests: part 2–numerical simulation. Compos Struct. 2016;136:727–742. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.062
Abi AbdallahE, BouvetC, RivallantS, Experimental analysis of damage creation and permanent indentation on highly oriented plates. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:1238–1245. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.029
35.
GuanZ, WeiH, JianhuaC, Permanent indentation and damage creation of laminates with different composite systems: An experimental investigation. Polym Compos. 2014;35(5):872–883. doi: 10.1002/pc.22731
