Good adhesion at fibre/matrix interface of lignocellulosic fibres is crucial when substituting synthetic fibres in polymer composites. The great variability presented by those fibres requires diverse characterisation studies for better insights on fibre surface treatments and resin systems interactions. In this work, Curaua fibres were treated using silane coupling agents to improve their interfacial properties with polyester. The fibres were pre-treated using 4 wt% solution of NaOH and then treated with 5 wt% solution of (3-aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane (AMPTS) or triethoxymethylsilane (TEMS). Characterisation of the treated fibres was carried out using infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and scanning electron microscopy. Fibre wettability and adhesion towards polyester was investigated using contact angle measurements and pull-out tests, respectively. The AMPTS treatment yielded a significant result of 20.2 MPa in interfacial shear strength (≈2.5 times that of the untreated fibre), attributed to the increase in availability of binding sites with polyester.
GandiniA, BelgacemMN, BarkoulaN-M, Interface engineering of natural fibre composites for maximum performance. 1st ed. Zafeiropoulos NE, editor. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2011.
2.
CuiH, KesslerMR.Pultruded glass fiber/bio-based polymer: interface tailoring with silane coupling agent. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. [Internet]. 2014;65:83–90. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.021.
3.
Valadez-GonzalezA, Cervantes-UcJ, OlayoR, Chemical modification of henequén fibers with an organosilane coupling agent. Compos. Part B Eng. 1999;30:321–331. doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00055-9
4.
TomczakF, SatyanarayanaKG, SydenstrickerTHD.Studies on lignocellulosic fibers of Brazil: Part III – morphology and properties of Brazilian curauá fibers. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. [Internet]. 2007;38:2227–2236. Available from:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359835X07001017. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.06.005
5.
SousaVMZ.Caracterização mecânica, térmica e morfológica de compósitos de polihidroxibutirato (phb) reforçados com fibras de curauá. Brasilia University; 2016.
Sena NetoAR, AraujoMAM, SouzaFVD, Characterization and comparative evaluation of thermal, structural, chemical, mechanical and morphological properties of six pineapple leaf fiber varieties for use in composites. Ind. Crops Prod. [Internet]. 2013;43:529–537. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.001.
8.
CarrollB.The accurate measurement of contact angle, phase contact areas, drop volume, and Laplace excess pressure in drop-on-fiber systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1976;57:488–495. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(76)90227-7
9.
OrueA, JauregiA, Peña-RodriguezC, The effect of surface modifications on sisal fiber properties and sisal/poly (lactic acid) interface adhesion. Compos Part B Eng [Internet. 2015;73:132–138. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.022.
10.
MoraesGO, SierakowskiMR, AbreuTM, Sodium Borohydride as a Protective Agent for the Alkaline treatment of sisal Fibers for polymer composites. Compos Interfaces. 2011;18:407–418. doi: 10.1163/156855411X595825
11.
KellyA, TysonWR.Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals: Copper/tungsten and copper/molybdenum. J Mech Phys Solids. 1965;13:329–350. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9
LiuM, FernandoD, DanielG, Effect of harvest time and field retting duration on the chemical composition, morphology and mechanical properties of hemp fibers. Ind Crops Prod. [Internet]. 2015;69:29–39. Available from:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0926669015001053. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.010
14.
SgricciaN, HawleyMC, MisraM.Characterization of natural fiber surfaces and natural fiber composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2008;39:1632–1637. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.007
15.
FaixO.Classification of Lignins from different botanical origins by FT-IR spectroscopy. Holzforschung. 1991;45:21–28. doi: 10.1515/hfsg.1991.45.s1.21
16.
KataokaY, KondoT.FT-IR microscopic analysis of changing cellulose crystalline structure during wood cell wall formation. Macromolecules. 1998;31:760–764. doi: 10.1021/ma970768c
ZhouF, ChengG, JiangB.Effect of silane treatment on microstructure of sisal fibers. Appl Surf Sci [Internet]. 2014;292:806–812. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.054.
19.
AbdelmoulehM, BoufiS, BelgacemMN, Modification of cellulosic fibres with functionalised silanes: development of surface properties. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2004;24:43–54. doi: 10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00099-X
20.
GutiérrezMC, De PaoliMA, FelisbertiMI.Biocomposites based on cellulose acetate and short curauá fibers: effect of plasticizers and chemical treatments of the fibers. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2012;43:1338–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.006
21.
YangH, YanR, ChenH, Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel. 2007;86:1781–1788. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013
d'AlmeidaALFS, BarretoDW, CaladoV, Thermal analysis of less common lignocellulose fibers. J Therm Anal Calorim [Internet. 2008;91:405–408. Available from:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10973-007-8606-6.
24.
AraujoJR, WaldmanWR, De PaoliMA.Thermal properties of high density polyethylene composites with natural fibres: coupling agent effect. Polym Degrad Stab. 2008;93:1770–1775. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.07.021
25.
SpinacéMAS, LambertCS, FermoselliKKG, Characterization of lignocellulosic curaua fibres. Carbohydr Polym. [Internet]. 2009;77:47–53. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.005.
26.
Kokta BV, MaldasD, DaneaultC, Composites of polyvinyl chloride-wood fibers. III: effect of silane as coupling agent. J Vinyl Technol. [Internet]. 1990;12:146–153. Available from:http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/vnl.730120306.
27.
McDougallGJ, MorrisonIM, StewartD, Plant Fibers - Botany, Chemistry and Processing for Industrial Use. J Sci Food Agric. 1993;62:1–20. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740620102
28.
Valadez-GonzalezA, Cervantes-UcJM, OlayoR, Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber-matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B Eng. 1999;30:309–320. doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00054-7
29.
KarimiK, TaherzadehMJ.A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresour Technol [Internet]. 2016;200:1008–1018. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.022.
30.
ŠirvaitieneA, JankauskaiteV, BekampieneP, Influence of natural fibre treatment on interfacial adhesion in biocomposites. Fibres Text East Eur. 2013;100:123–129.
31.
BaleyC, BusnelF, GrohensY, Influence of chemical treatments on surface properties and adhesion of flax fibre-polyester resin. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2006;37:1626–1637. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.014
32.
SawpanMA, PickeringKL, FernyhoughA.Effect of fibre treatments on interfacial shear strength of hemp fibre reinforced polylactide and unsaturated polyester composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf [Internet. 2011;42:1189–1196. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.003.
