Recent research has shown superstitious behaviour and illusion of control in human subjects exposed to the negative reinforcement conditions that are traditionally assumed to lead to the opposite outcome (i.e. learned helplessness). The experiments reported in this paper test the generality of these effects in two different tasks and under different conditions of percentage (75% vs. 25%) and distribution (random vs. last-trials) of negative reinforcement (escape from uncontrollable noise). All three experiments obtained superstitious behaviour and illusion of control and question the generality of learned helplessness as a consequence of exposing humans to uncontrollable outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsonL. Y.SeligmanM. E. P.TeasdaleJ. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology87, 49–74.
2.
AlloyL. B.AbramsonL. Y. (1979). Judgement of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General108, 441–485.
3.
BracewellR. J.BlackA. H. (1974). The effect of restraint and noncontingent preshock upon subsequent learning in the rat.Learning and Motivation5, 53–69.
4.
BrunerA.RevuskyS. H. (1961). Collateral behavior in humans.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior4, 349–350.
5.
BuchwaldA. M.CoyneJ. C.ColeC. S. (1978). A critical evaluation of the learned helplessness model of depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology87, 180–193.
6.
CataniaA. C.Cutts (1963). Experimental control of superstitious responding in humans.Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior6, 203–208.
7.
CondeV.EstebanT.UserosE. (1976). Revisión crítica de la adaptación castellana del cuestionario de Beck.Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada31, 469–497.
8.
CoyneJ. C.MetalskyG. I.LavelleT. L. (1980). Learned helplessness as experimenter-induced failure and its alleviation with attentional redeployment.Journal of Abnormal Psychology89, 350–357.
9.
FrankelA.SnyderM. L. (1978). Poor performance following unsolvable problems: Learned helplessness or egotism?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36, 1415–1423.
10.
GibbonJ.BerrymanR.ThompsonR. L. (1974). Contingency spaces and measures in classical and instrumental conditioning.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior21, 585–605.
11.
GlazerH. I.WeissJ. M. (1976a). Long-term interference and transitory interference effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes2, 191–201.
12.
GlazerH. I.WeissJ. M. (1976b). Long-term interference effect: An alternative to “learned helplessness”.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes2, 202–213.
13.
HerrnsteinR. J. (1966). Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning.Operant behavior: Areas of research and application.HonigW. K.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts33–51.
14.
HirotoD. S.SeligmanM. E. P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31, 311–327.
15.
KilleenR. R. (1981). Learning as causal inference.Quantitative analyses of behavior, Vol. 1: Discriminative properties of reinforcement schedules.CommonsM. L.NevinsJ. A.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.89–112.
16.
KoftaM.SedekG. (1989). Repeated failure: A source of helplessness or a factor irrelevant to its emergence?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118, 3–12.
17.
LangerE. J. (1975). The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32, 311–328.
18.
MaierS. F. (1989). Learned helplessness: Event covariation and cognitive changes.Contemporary learning theories: Instrumental conditioning theory and the impact of biological constraints on learning.KleinS. B.MowrerR. R.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.73–110.
19.
MaierS. F.SeligmanM. E. P. (1976). Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General105, 3–46.
20.
MatuteH. (1974). Learned helplessness and superstitious behavior as opposite effects of uncontrollable reinforcement in humans.Learning and Motivation25, 216–232.
21.
MinorT. R.DessN. K.OvermierJ. B. (1991). Inverting the traditional view of “learned helplessness”.Fear, avoidance, and phobias: A fundamental analysis.DennyR. M.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.87–133.
22.
OvermierJ. B.SeligmanM. E. P. (1967). Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance learning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology63, 28–33.
23.
SchwartzB. (1981a). Does helplessness cause depression, or do only depressed people become helpless? Comment on Alloy and Abramson.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General110, 429–435.
24.
SchwartzB. (1981b). Helplessness, illusions and depression: Final comment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General110, 448–449.
25.
SedekG.KoftaM. (1990). When cognitive exertion does not yield cognitive gain: Toward an informational explanation of learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58, 729–743.
26.
SeligmanM. E. P.MaierS. F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock.Journal of Experimental Psychology74, 1–9.
27.
ShanksD. R.DickinsonA. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgement.The psychology of learning and motivation.BowerG. H.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Vol. 21, 229–261.
28.
SkinnerB. F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology38, 168–172.
29.
SkinnerE. A. (1985). Action, control judgments, and the structure of control experience.Psychological Review92, 39–58.
30.
WassermanE. A. (1990). Detecting response-outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment.The psychology of learning and motivation.BowerG. H.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Vol. 26, 27–82.
31.
WortmanC. B. (1975). Some determinants of perceived control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31, 282–294.
32.
WrightJ. C. (1962). Consistency and complexity of response sequences as a function of schedules of noncontingent reward.Journal of Experimental Psychology63, 601–609.
33.
YellottJ. I.Jr. (1969). Probability learning with noncontingent success.Journal of Mathematical Psychology6, 541–575.
