Research on visual selective attention has shown that processing of distractors can produce (1) interference with response to a concurrent target, and (2) negative priming of response to a subsequent target. These results support late-selection accounts of attention. However, recent findings demonstrate that when conditions are optimal for attentional focusing, the interference effects are almost entirely eliminated. This result has been interpreted as supporting early-selection accounts. The present study investigates the impact of focusing attention on negative priming in addition to interference effects. In a letter-identification task, reliable interference and negative priming effects were observed from distractors. However, when the location of the target in the prime display was pre-cued, interference effects were significantly reduced, but negative priming effects did not decrease. This pattern of results provides further evidence that the absence of interference is insufficient to determine whether distractors have been semantically processed (Driver & Tipper, 1989).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportD. A. (1989). Visual attention.Foundations of cognitive science.PosnerM. I.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AllportD. A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of 25 years.Attention and Performance XIV: A Silver Jubilee.MeyerD. E.KornblumS.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3.
AllportD. A.TipperS. P.ChmielN. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering.Attention and Performance XI.PosnerM. I.MarinO. S. M.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
4.
BroadbentD. E. (1958). Perception and communicationOxford: Pergamon Press.
5.
Dalrymple-AlfordE. C.BudayrB. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test.Perceptual and Motor Skills23, 1211–1214.
6.
DeutschJ. A.DeutschD. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review70, 80–90.
7.
DriverJ.TipperS. P. (1989). On the nonselectivity of selective seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15, 304–414.
8.
DunbarK.MacLeodC. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10, 622–639.
9.
EriksenB. A.EriksenC. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception and Psychophysics16, 143–149.
10.
EriksenC. W.ColesM. G. H.MorrisL. R.O'HaraW. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society23, 165–168.
11.
FoxE. (in press). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
12.
FoxE. (1994). Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty.Perception and Psychophysics56, 565–574.
13.
FuentesL. J.OrtellsJ. J. (1993). Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: Evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.Acta Psychologica84, 213–229.
14.
GathercoleS. E.BroadbentD. E. (1987). Spatial factors in visual attention: Some compensatory effects of location and time of arrival of nontargets.Perception16, 433–443.
15.
HagenaarR.van der HeijdenA. H. C. (1986). Target-noise separation in visual selective attention.Acta Psychologica62, 161–176.
16.
KeeleS. W.NeillW. T. (1978). Mechanisms of attention.Handbook of perception.CarteretteE. C.FriedmanM. P.New York: Academic PressVol. 9, 3–47.
17.
LambertA. J. (1985). Selectivity and stages of processing—An enduring controversy in attentional theory: A review.Current Psychological Research and ReviewsFall, 239–256.
18.
LambertA. J.BeardC. T.ThompsonR. J. (1988). Selective attention, visual laterality, awareness, and perceiving the meaning of parafoveally presented words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology40A, 615–652.
19.
MillerJ. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions.Perception and Psychophysics49, 270–288.
20.
MillikenB.TipperS. P.WeaverB. (1994). Negative priming in a spatial localization task: Feature mismatching and inhibition of distractor location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 624–646.
21.
MooreC. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone?.Perception and Psychophysics56, 133–147.
22.
NeelyJ. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General106, 226–254.
23.
NeillW. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3, 444–450.
24.
NeillW. T. (1989). Lexical ambiguity and context: An activation-suppression model.Resolving semantic ambiguity.GorfeinD. S.New York: Springer-Verlag63–83.
25.
NeillW. T.LissnerL. S. (1988). Attention and selective inhibition in alphanumeric character matching.Buffalo Paper presented to the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association. April.
26.
NeillW. T.ValdesL. A.TerryK. M. (in press). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition.New perspectives on interference and inhibition in cognition.DempsterF. N.BrainerdC. J.New York: Academic Press.
27.
NeumannE.DeSchepperB. G. (1992). An inhibition-based fan effect: Evidence for an active suppression mechanism in selective attention.Canadian Journal of Psychology46, 1–40.
28.
PaquetL.LortieC. (1990). Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.Perception and Psychophysics48, 382–388.
29.
PosnerM. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology32A, 3–26.
30.
SchneiderW. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers20, 206–217.
31.
ShafferW. O.LaBergeD. (1979). Automatic semantic processing of unattended words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18, 413–426.
32.
TipperS. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37A, 571–590.
33.
TipperS. P.MacQueenG. M.BrehautJ. C. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention.Perception and Psychophysics43, 45–52.
34.
TsalY. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9, 523–530.
35.
UnderwoodG.ThwaitesS. (1982). Automatic phonological coding of unattended printed words.Memory and Cognition10, 434–442.
36.
ValdesL. A. (1993). The relation of negative priming to interferenceGarden City, NY: Adelphi University Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
37.
YantisS.JohnstonJ. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16, 135–149.
38.
YeeP. L. (1991). Semantic inhibition of ignored words during a figure classification task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology43A, 127–153.
