Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Rats were exposed to a novel environment (E1) at time T1, given a footshock at time T2, and tested for freezing in E1 or in a second environment (E2). The function relating freezing to the T1-T2 interval among rats tested in E1 was an inverted U-shape. Rats exposed to short T1-T2 intervals displayed just as much freezing in E2 as in E1, whereas rats exposed to longer intervals froze less in E2 than in E1. These differences between the freezing responses in E1 and in E2 were obtained when the T1-T2 intervals were varied, but time spent in the shocked E1 was equated. Rats given two shocks in E1 differentiated between E1 and E2 when the initial shock occurred some time after exposure to E1, but not when the initial shock was presented shortly after that exposure. Rats shocked some time after exposure to E1 on Day 1 and shortly after exposure to that environment on Day 2 differentiated between E1 and E2 more than did rats exposed to the reverse sequence of T1-T2 intervals. The results were attributed to the formation of a network of connections among the E1 cues in rats exposed to moderate or long T1-T2 intervals, and to an impairment in the formation of this network as a result of the conditioning of a subset of cues in rats exposed to short T1-T2 intervals.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cheatle

M. D.

Rudy

J. M.

(1978). Analysis of second-order odor-aversion conditioning in neonatal rats: Implications of Kamin's blocking effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 4, 273–349.

Fanselow

M. S.

(1980). Conditioned and unconditioned components of post-shock freezing. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences 15, 177–182.

Fanselow

M. S.

(1986). Associative vs. topographical accounts of the immediate shock freezing deficit in rats: Implications for the response selection rules governing species specific defensive reactions. Learning and Motivation 17, 16–39.

Fanselow

M. S.

(1990). Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior 18, 264–270.

Hall

Honey

R. C.

(1989). Perceptual and associative learning. Contemporary learning theories. Klein

S. B.

Mowrer

R. R.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 117–147.

Hays

W. L.

(1972). Statistics for the social sciences New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Holland

P. C.

(1980). Second-order conditioning with and without unconditioned stimulus presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 6, 238–250.

Kamin

L. J.

(1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. Punishment and aversive behavior. Campbell

B. A.

Church

R. M.

New York: Appleton-Century-Croft 276–296.

Kiernan

M. J.

Westbrook

R. F.

(1993). Effects of exposure to a to-be-shocked environment upon the rat's freezing response: Evidence for facilitation, latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46B, 271–288.

10.

McLaren

I. P. L.

Kaye

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. Parallel distributed processing-implications for psychology and neurobiology. Morris

R. G. M.

Oxford: Oxford University Press 102–130.

11.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1983). Conditioning and associative learning Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Miller

R. G.

(1966). Stimultaneous statistical inference New York: McGraw-Hill.

13.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1982). Effects of a stimulus intervening between CS and US in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 8, 131–141.

14.

Rizley

R. C.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1972). Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 81, 1–11.

15.

Wagner

A. R.

(1976). Priming in STM: An information processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior and neurophysiology. Tighe

T. J.

Leaton

R. N.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 95–128.

Effects of the Interval between Exposure to a Novel Environment and the Occurrence of Shock on the Freezing Responses of Rats

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References