In two appetitive licking experiments, thirsty rats were pre-exposed to two stimuli prior to conditioning sessions in which one or both of these stimuli were paired with water. Consistent with other results, latent inhibition was disrupted when conditioning took place in a context different from that in which stimulus pre-exposure had occurred. But in animals given prior exposure to the context of stimulus pre-exposure before the start of stimulus pre-exposure, substantial and equivalent latent inhibition was evident whether or not there was a change of context between stimulus pre-exposure and conditioning. These results are discussed in terms of current theories of latent inhibition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerA. G.MercierP. (1982). Extinction of the context and latent inhibition.Learning and Motivation13, 391–416.
2.
HallG. (1991). Perceptual and associative learningOxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
HallG.ChannellS. (1985a). Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes11, 470–481.
4.
HallG.ChannellS. (1985b). Latent inhibition and conditioning after preexposure to the training context.Learning and Motivation16, 381–387.
5.
HallG.ChannellS. (1986). Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology38B, 121–139.
6.
HallG.HoneyR. C. (1989). Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: Associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes15, 232–241.
7.
HallG.MinorH. (1984). A search for context-stimulus associations in latent inhibition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology36B, 145–169.
8.
KasprowW. J.SchachtmanT. R.MillerR. R. (1985). Associability of a previously conditioned stimulus as a function of qualitative changes in the US.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37B, 33–48.
9.
KayeH.PrestonG. C.SzaboL.DruiffH.MackintoshN. J. (1987). Context specificity of conditioning and latent inhibition: Evidence for a dissociation of latent inhibition and associative interference.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology39B, 127–145.
10.
KurzE. M.LevitskyD. A. (1982). Novelty of contextual cues in taste aversion learning.Animal Learning and Behaviour10, 229–232.
11.
LovibondP. F.PrestonG. C.MackintoshN. J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction and latent inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes10, 360–375.
12.
LubowR. E.MooreA. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the conditioned stimulus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology52, 415–419.
13.
McLarenI. P. L.KayeH.MackintoshN. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition.Parallel distributed processing—Implications for psychology and neurobiology.MorrisR. G. M.Oxford: Clarendon Press102–130.
14.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 276–298.
15.
MatzelL. D.SchachtmanT. R.MillerR. R. (1988). Learned irrelevance exceeds the sum of CS-pre-exposure and US-pre-exposure deficits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes14, (3)311–319.
16.
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review87, 532–552.
17.
SpearN. E. (1973). Retrieval of memory in animals.Psychological Review80, 163–175.
18.
SwartzentruberD.BoutonM. E. (1986). Contextual control of negative transfer produced by prior CS-US pairings.Learning and Motivation17, 366–385.
19.
WagnerA. R. (1978). Expectancies and the priming of STM.Cognitive processes in animal behavior.HulseS. H.FowlerH.HonigW. K.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.177–210.
20.
WagnerA. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behaviour.Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms.SpearN. E.MillerR. R.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.5–47.
21.
WeissK. R.BrownP. L. (1974). Latent inhibition: A review and a new hypothesis.Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis34, 301–316.
