Role of Magnitude of Reinforcement in Spaced-Trial Instrumental Learning in Turtles (Geoclemys reevesii)

Abstract

The runway performance of turtles (Geoclemys reevesii) was studied as a function of magnitude of reinforcement under spaced training conditions (one trial per day). A large reward magnitude (24 pellets) produced faster acquisition than a small magnitude (2 pellets). After a shift from the large to the small magnitude, latencies of the shifted animals continued to be significantly lower than the latencies of the non-shifted, small-magnitude controls, and similar to those of the non-shifted, large-magnitude controls. There was no evidence of the successive negative contrast effect. Extinction latencies were also significantly lower after training with the large magnitude than after training with the small magnitude; that is, there was no evidence of the magnitude of reinforcement extinction effect. The results are discussed in relation to the comparative analysis of the so-called paradoxical effects of reward, a family of learning phenomena that has not yet been found in a variety of experiments with fish, amphibians, and reptiles trained under widely spaced conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amsel

(1992). Frustration theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Amsel

Ward

J. S.

(1965). Frustration and persistence: Resistance to discrimination following prior experience with the discriminanda. Psychological Monographs 79, (whole No. 597).

Benton

M. J.

(1990). Phylogeny of the major tetrapod groups: Morphological data and divergence dates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30, 409–424.

Bitterman

M. E.

(1975). The comparative analysis of learning. Science 188, 699–709.

Boitano

J. J.

Foskett

M. D.

(1968). Effects of partial reinforcement on speed of approach responses in goldfish. Carassius auratus). Psychological Reports 22, 741–744.

Brunner

R. L.

Haggbloom

S. J.

Gazzara

R. A.

(1974). Effects of hippocampal X-irradiation-produced granule-cell agenesis on instrumental runway performance in rats. Physiology & Behavior 13, 485–494.

Burghardt

G. M.

(1977). Learning processes in reptiles. The biology of reptiles. Gans

Tinkle

New York: Academic Press Vol. 1, 555–681.

Chaline

(1990). Paleontology of vertebrates Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Chen

J.-S.

Gross

Amsel

(1981). Ontogeny of successive negative contrast and its dissociation from other paradoxical reward effects in preweanling rats. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology 95, 146–159.

10.

Couvillon

P. A.

Bitterman

M. E.

(1985). Effect of experience with a preferred food on consummatory responding for a less preferred food in goldfish. Animal Learning & Behavior 13, 433–438.

11.

Crespi

(1942). Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. American Journal of Psychology 55, 467–517.

12.

DiLollo

Beez

(1966). Negative contrast effect as a function of magnitude of reward decrement. Psychonomic Science 5, 99–100.

13.

Egami

(1974). [Amphibians and reptiles.]. Experimental zoology: Part II. Tajima

Tokyo: Asakura-Shoten (in Japanese) 372–389.

14.

Elliott

M. H.

(1928). The effect of change of reward on the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology 4, 19–30.

15.

Ernst

C. H.

Barbour

R. W.

(1989). Turtles of the world Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

16.

Gonzalez

R. C.

Behrend

E. R.

Bitterman

M. E.

(1965). Partial reinforcement in the fish: Experiments with spaced trials and partial delay. American Journal of Psychology 78, 198–207.

17.

Gonzalez

R. C.

Bitterman

M. E.

(1962). A further study of partial reinforcement in the turtle. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 14, 109–112.

18.

Gonzalez

R. C.

Holmes

N. K.

Bitterman

M. E.

(1967). Resistance to extinction in the goldfish as a function of frequency and amount of reward. American Journal of Psychology 80, 269–275.

19.

Gonzalez

R. C.

Potts

Pitcoff

Bitterman

M. E.

(1972). Runway performance of goldfish as a function of complete and incomplete reduction in amount of reward. Psychonomic Science 27, 305–307.

20.

Graf

C. L.

(1972). Spaced-trial partial reward in the lizard. Psychonomic Science 27, 153–154.

21.

Howell

D. C.

(1992). Statistical methods for psychology, third ed. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.

22.

Hug

J. J.

(1970). Frustration effect after development of patterned responding to single alternation reinforcement. Psychonomic Science 21, 61–62.

23.

Hulse

S. H.

Jr. (1958). Amount and percentage of reinforcement and duration of goal confinement in conditioning and extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology 56, 48–57.

24.

Jarrard

L. E.

Isaacson

R. L.

(1965). Hippocampal ablation in rats: Effects of intertrial interval. Nature 207, 109–110.

25.

Longo

Bitterman

M. E.

(1960). The effect of partial reinforcement with spaced practice on resistance to extinction in the fish. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 53, 169–172.

26.

Lowes

Bitterman

M. E.

(1967). Reward and learning in the goldfish. Science 157, 455–457.

27.

Macphail

E. M.

(1982). Brain and intelligence in vertebrates Oxford: Clarendon Press.

28.

McCain

Dyleski

McElvain

(1971). Reward magnitude and instrumental responses: Consistent reward. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements 3, 249–256.

29.

Muzio

R. N.

Segura

E. T.

Papini

M. R.

(1992). The effect of schedule and magnitude of reinforcement on instrumental acquisition and extinction in the toad. Bufo arenarum. Learning and Motivation 23, 406–429.

30.

Muzio

R. N.

Segura

E. T.

Papini

M. R.

(1993). Effects of lesions in the medial pallium on instrumental learning in the toad. Bufo arenarum). Physiology & Behavior 54, 185–188.

31.

Muzio

R. N.

Segura

E. T.

Papini

M. R.

(in press). Learning under partial reinforcement in the toad (Bufo arenarum): Effects of lesions in the medial pallium. Behavioral & Neural Biology.

32.

Northcutt

R. G.

(1974). Some histochemical observations on the telencephalon of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. Journal of Comparative Neurology 157, 379–389.

33.

Northcutt

R. G.

Ronan

(1992). Afferent and efferent connections of the bullfrog medial pallium. Brain, Behavior & Evolution 40, 1–16.

34.

Papini

M. R.

Mustaca

A. E.

Bitterman

M. E.

(1988). Successive negative contrast in the consummatory responding of didelphid marsupials. Animal Learning and Behavior 16, 53–57.

35.

Papini

M. R.

Muzio

R. N.

Segura

E. T.

Instrumental learning in toads (Bufo arenarum): Reinforcer magnitude and the medial pallium(submitted).

36.

Papini

M. R.

Ramallo

(1990). Primary frustration in the red opossum. Lutreolina crassicaudata. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 3, 235–242.

37.

Parmenter

R. R.

Avery

H. W.

(1990). The feeding ecology of the slider turtle. Life history and ecology of the slider turtle. Gibbons

J. W.

Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press 257–266.

38.

Pert

Bitterman

M. E.

(1970). Reward and learning in the turtle. Learning and Motivation 1, 121–128.

39.

Pert

Gonzalez

R. C.

(1974). Behavior of the turtle (Chrysemys picta picta) in simultaneous, successive, and behavioral contrast situations. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 87, 526–538.

40.

Powers

A. S.

(1990). Brain mechanisms of learning in reptiles. Neurobiology of comparative cognition. Kesner

R. P.

Olton

D. S.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 157–177.

41.

Ratliff

R. G.

Ratliff

A. R.

(1971). Runway acquisition and extinction as a joint function of magnitude of reward and percentage of rewarded acquisition trials. Learning and Motivation 2, 289–295.

42.

Rawlins

J. N. P.

Feldon

Gray

J. A.

(1980). The effects of hippocampectomy and of fimbria section upon the partial reinforcement extinction effect in rats. Experimental Brain Research 38, 273–283.

43.

Roberts

W. A.

Bullock

D. H.

Bitterman

M. E.

(1963). Resistance to extinction in the pigeon after partially reinforced instrumental training under discrete-trials conditions. American Journal of Psychology 76, 353–365.

44.

Schmajuk

N. A.

Segura

E. T.

Ruidiaz

A. C.

(1981). Reward downshift in the toad. Behavioral and Neural Biology 33, 519–523.

45.

Schutz

S. L.

Bitterman

M. E.

(1969). Spaced-trials partial reinforcement and resistance to extinction in the goldfish. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 68, 126–128.

46.

Suboski

M. D.

(1992). Releaser-induced recognition learning by amphibians and reptiles. Animal Learning & Behavior 20, 63–82.

47.

Tinklepaugh

(1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of Comparative Psychology 8, 197–236.

48.

Wagner

A. R.

(1959). The role of reinforcement and nonreinforcement in an “apparent frustration effect”. Journal of Experimental Psychology 57, 130–136.

49.

Wagner

A. R.

(1961). Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, 234–242.

50.

Weinstock

(1954). Resistance to extinction of a running response following partial reinforcement under widely spaced trials. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 47, 318–322.

51.

Weinstock

(1958). Acquisition and extinction of a partially reinforced running response at a 24-hour intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology 56, 151–158.