Effects of Exposure to a To-Be-Shocked Environment upon the Rat's Freezing Response: Evidence for Facilitation,Latent Inhibition,and Perceptual Learning

Abstract

Three experiments used the freezing response of rats to examine the effects of pre-exposure to an environment upon (1) its associability with shock and (2) its discriminability from a second environment. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that freezing was proportional to the interval between exposure to the environment at time T1 and the occurrence of shock at T2. This function was shifted by pre-exposure to the to-be-shocked environment, with brief pre-exposures increasing (facilitation) and extended pre-exposures decreasing (latent inhibition) the impact of a given T1-T2 interval on freezing. Experiment 3 provided evidence that the facilitatory and latent inhibitory effects resulting from brief and extended exposures to the to-be-shocked environment were accompanied by an increase in discriminability. The results were taken to have supported the claim that pre-exposure changes associability as well as discriminability (Hall & Honey, 1989) and were discussed in terms of the model for perceptual learning proposed by McLaren, Kaye, and Mackintosh (1990).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fanselow

M. S.

(1980). Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences 15, 177–182.

Fanselow

M. S.

(1982). The postshock activity burst. Animal Learning & Behavior 10, 448–454.

Fanselow

M. S.

(1986). Associative vs. topographical accounts of the immediate shock freezing deficit in rats: Implications for the response selection rules governing species specific defensive reactions. Learning and Motivation 17, 16–39.

Fanselow

M. S.

(1990). Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior 18, 264–270.

Hall

Honey

R. C.

(1989). Perceptual and associative learning. Contemporary learning theories. Klein

S. B.

Mowrer

R. R.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 117–147.

Hays

W. L.

(1972). Statistics for the social sciences New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Honey

R. C.

Hall

(1989). Enhanced discriminability and reduced associability following flavor preexposure. Learning and Motivation 19, 262–277.

Lubow

R. E.

(1973). Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin 79, 398–407.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1983). Conditioning and associative learning Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10.

McLaren

I. P. L.

Kaye

Macintosh

N. J.

(1990). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. Parallel distributed processing—Implications for psychology and neurobiology. Morris

R. G. M.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11.

Reiss

Wagner

A. R.

(1972). CS habituation produces “latent inhibition” effect but no active “conditioned inhibition”. Learning and Motivation 3, 237–245.

12.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1971). Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 75, 77–81.