This experiment explores the role of prosodic cues in resolving temporary morphosyntactic ambiguities in spoken language comprehension. Using a cross-modal naming task, we find that prosodic cues are as effective as overt lexical cues in controlling how the listener resolves attachment ambiguities. This suggests that prosodic factors can affect the early stages of parsing and interpretation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CooperW. E.Paccia-CooperJ. (1980). Syntax and speechCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
CooperW. E.SorensenJ.M. (1981). Fundamental frequency in sentence productionBerlin: Springer.
3.
FrazierL. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategiesUniversity of Connecticut Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
4.
FrazierL.FodorJ.D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition6, 291–325.
5.
FrazierL.RaynerK. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology14, 178–210.
6.
GrosjeanF. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics28, 267–283.
7.
HolmesV.M.KennedyA. (1983). Reading under three modes of rapid serial visual presentationHobart Paper presented at 10th Annual Australian Experimental Psychology Conference.
8.
HolmesV.M.KennedyA.MurrayW.S. (1987). Syntactic structure and the garden path. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology39A, 277–293.
9.
KennedyA.MurrayW.S.JenningsF.ReidC. (1989). Parsing complements: Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Langunge and Cognitive Processes4, SI 51–76.
10.
LehisteI. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa7, 107–121.
11.
LehisteI.OliveJ.P.StreeterL.A. (1976). The role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America60, 1199–1202.
12.
Marslen-WilsonW.D.TylerL.K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition8, 1–71.
13.
Marslen-WilsonW.D.TylerL.K. (1987). Against modularity. Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding.GarfieldJ.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Marslen-WilsonW.D.TylerL.K.SeidenbergM. (1978). Sentence processing and the clause boundary. Studies in sentence perception.LeveltW.J.M.Flores D'ArcaisG.B.New York: Wiley.
15.
NesporM.A.VogelI. (1983). Prosodic structure above the word. Prosody: Models and measurements.CutlerA.LaddD.R.Berlin: Springer.
16.
RaynerK.CarlsonM.FrazierL. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior22, 358–374.
17.
RaynerK.FrazierL. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology39A, 657–473.
18.
ScottD.R. (1982). Duration as a cue to the perception of phrase boundary perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America71, 966–1007.
19.
SelkirkE.O. (1980). On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structureReproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club.
20.
StreeterL.A. (1978). Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America64, 1582–1592.
21.
SwinneyD.ZurifE.CutlerA. (1980). Effects of sentential stress and word class upon comprehension in Broca's aphasics. Brain and Language10, 132–144.
22.
TylerL.K.Marslen-WilsonW.D. (1977). The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior16, 683–692.
23.
TylerL.K.Marslen-WilsonW.D. (1982). Processing utterances in discourse contexts: On-line resolution of anaphors. Journal of Semantics1, 297–314.
24.
TylerL.K.WarrenP. (1987). Local and global structure in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language26, 638–657.
25.
WarrenP. (1985). The temporal organisation and perception of speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.
