In four experiments we investigated the role of contextual cues in the habituation of neophobia in rats. Experiment 1 showed that the consumption of a novel flavour increased across a series of presentations in one context (A) but fell when the flavour was subsequently presented in a second, novel, context (B). In Experiments 2 and 3, subjects again received exposure to a flavour in context A, but also were familiarized with the test context, B. These subjects consumed the flavour with equal readiness, whether it was presented in Context A or in Context B at test. Experiment 4 replicated the results of Experiment 1 and also showed that the consumption of a novel flavour was not influenced by whether it was presented in a novel or a familiar context. Several mechanisms by which the novelty or familiarity of the context might interact with the novelty or familiarity of the flavour were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArcherT.SjödénP. O. (1979). Neophobia in taste-aversion conditioning: Individual differences and effects of contextual changes.Physiological Psychology7, 364–369.
2.
ArcherT.SjödénP. O.NilssonL. G. (1985). Contextual control of taste-aversion conditioning and extinction.Context and learning.BalsamP. O.TomieA.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.225–271.
3.
BakerA. G.MercierP. (1982). Prior experience with the conditioning events: Evidence for a rich cognitive representation.Quantitative analyses of behaviour.CommonsM. L.HerrnsteinR. J.WagnerA. R.Cambridge, MA: BallingerVol. 3, 117–143.
4.
BerlyneD. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosityNew York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
DomjanM. (1976). Determinants of the enhancement of flavored-water intake by prior exposure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes2, 17–27.
6.
DomjanM. (1977). Attenuation and enhancement of neophobia for edible substances.Learning mechanisms in food selection.BarkerL. M.BestM. R.DomjanM.Waco, TX: Baylor University Press151–179.
7.
EvansJ. G. M.HammondG. R. (1983). Differential generalization of habituation across contexts as a function of stimulus significance.Animal Learning and Behavior11, 431–434.
8.
GrovesP. M.ThompsonR. F. (1970). Habituation: A dual-process theory.Psychological Review77, 419–450.
9.
HallG. (1991). Perceptual and associative learningOxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
HallG.ChannellS. (1985). Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes11, 470–481.
11.
HallG.ChannellS. (1986). Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology38B, 121–139.
12.
HallG.HoneyR. C. (1989). Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: Associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes15, 232–241.
13.
HallG.SchachtmanT. R. (1987). Differential effects of a retention interval on latent inhibition and the habituation of an orienting response.Animal Learning and Behavior15, 76–82.
14.
HolderM. D. (1988). Possible role of confounded taste stimuli in conditioned taste aversions.Animal Learning and Behavior16, 231–234.
15.
KurzE. M.LevitskyD. A. (1982). Novelty of contextual cues in taste-aversion learning.Animal Learning and Behavior10, 229–232.
16.
LeatonR. N. (1974). Long-term retention of the habituation of lick suppression in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology:87, 1157–1164.
17.
LubowR. E.RifkinB.AlekM. (1976). The context effect: The relationship between stimulus preexposure and environmental preexposure determines subsequent learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes2, 38–47.
18.
MarlinN. A.MillerR. R. (1981). Associations to contextual stimuli as a determinant of long-term habituation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes7, 313–333.
19.
MitchellD.KirschbaumE. H.PerryR. L. (1975). Effects of neophobia and habituation on the poison-induced avoidance of exteroceptive stimuli in the rat.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes1, 47–55.
20.
MitchellD.WinterW.MoffittT. (1980). Cross-modality contrast: Exteroceptive context habituation enhances taste neophobia and conditioned taste aversions.Animal Learning and Behavior8, 524–528.
21.
SjödénP. O.ArcherT. (1988). Exteroceptive cues in taste-aversion learning, no artifact: Reply to Holder.Animal Learning and Behaviour16, 235–239.
22.
SokolovY. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflexOxford: Pergamon Press.
23.
WagnerA. R. (1976). An information processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance.Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology.TigheT. J.LeatonR. N.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.95–128.
