Four eyelid conditioning experiments designed to be comparable to rabbit nictitating membrane (NMR) studies examined the blocking phenomenon in humans. All experiments utilized a within-subjects design, with Stage 1 of discrimination, Stage 2 of compound training, and a final test stage comparing responding to the blocked and non-blocked CSs. In two of the experiments (1 and 4) the comparison was made within subjects over all extinction trials. In Experiment 3 the test phase consisted of further reinforced training of the blocked and non-blocked CSs. These three experiments produced evidence of blocking when all extinction trials were entered into the analysis. Experiment 2, which involved a between-subjects comparison, failed to demonstrate the blocking effect. Wide variability both between and within subjects obscured the experimental effects. Post-experimental questionnaires designed to assess awareness of stimulus relations failed to identify a subjective blocking effect and showed no relationship to conditioned eyelid responding
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaerP. E.FuhrerM. J. (1982). Cognitive factors in the concurrent differential conditioning of eyelid and skin conductance responses.Memory and Cognition10, 135–140.
2.
BaeyensF.EelenP.van den BerghO. (1990). Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning.Cognition and Emotion4, 3–18.
3.
BrewerW. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans.Cognition and the Symbolic Processes.WeimerW.PalermoD.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.1–42.
4.
DaveyG. C. L.SinghJ. (1988). The Kamin “blocking” effect and electrodermal conditioning in humans.Journal of Psychophysiology2, 17–25.
5.
DawsonM. E. (1973). Can classical conditioning occur without contingency learning? A review and evaluation of the evidence.Psychophysiology10, 82–86.
6.
DawsonM. E.ReardonD. P. (1973). Construct validity of recall and recognition post-conditioning measures of awareness.Journal of Experimental Psychology98, 308–315.
7.
DawsonM. E.SchellA. M. (1987). Human autonomic and skeletal classical conditioning: The role of conscious cognitive factors.Cognitive Processes and Pavlovian Conditioning in Humans.DaveyG.Chichester: Wiley27–55.
8.
FrckaG.BeytsJ.LeveyA. B.MartinI. (1983). The role of awareness in human conditioning.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science18, 69–76.
9.
FuredyJ. J.ArabianJ. M.ThielsE.GeorgeL. (1982). Direct and continuous measurement of relational learning in human Pavlovian conditioning.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science17, 69–79.
10.
GarnerW. R. (1974). The processing of information and structureNew York: Wiley.
11.
GrantD. A. (1943). Sensitization and association in eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology32, 201–212.
12.
GringsW. W. (1969). Transfer of response from compound conditioned stimuli.Psychonomic Science15, 187–188.
13.
KaminL. J. (1968). Attention-like processes in classical conditioning.Miami Symposium on the prediction of behavior, 1967: Aversive stimulation.JonesM. R.Miami: University of Miami Press.
14.
KehoeE. J. (1986). Summation and configuration in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to compound stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes12, 186–195.
15.
KehoeE. J.GormezanoI. (1980). Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli.Psychological Bulletin87, 351–378.
16.
KehoeE. J.SchreursB. G.AmodeiN. (1981). Blocking acquisition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to serial conditioned stimuli.Learning and Motivation12, 92–108.
17.
LachnitH. (1988). Convergent validation of information processing constructs with Pavlovian methodology.Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance14, 143–152.
18.
LawL. N.LeveyA. B.MartinI. (1980). Response detection and measurement.Techniques in psychophysiology.MartinI.VenablesP. H.Chichester: Wiley629–663.
19.
LeveyA. B.MartinI. (1981a). Personality and conditioning.A model for personality.EysenckH. J.Berlin: Springer-Verlag123–168.
20.
LeveyA. B.MartinI. (1981b). The relevance of classical conditioning to psychosomatic disorder.Foundations of psychosomatics.ChristieM. J.MellettP.Chichester: Wiley259–282.
21.
LovibondP. F.SiddleD. A. T.BondN. (1988). Insensitivity to stimulus validity in human Pavlovian conditioning.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology40B, 377–410.
22.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 276–298.
23.
MaleskeR. T.FreyP. W. (1979). Blocking in eyelid conditioning: Effect of changing the CS-UCS interval and introducing an intertrial stimulus.Animal Learning and Behaviour7, 452–456.
24.
MarchantH. G.MooreJ. W. (1973). Blocking of the rabbit's conditioned nictitating membrane response in Kamin's two-stage paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology101, 155–158.
25.
MartinI.LeveyA. B. (1969). The genesis of the classical conditioned responseOxford: Pergamon Press.
26.
MartinI.LeveyA. B. (1987). Knowledge, action and control.Theoretical foundation of behavior therapy.EysenckH. J.MartinIreneNew York: Plenum133–151.
27.
PellonR.Garcia MontanoJ. M. (1990). The conditioned stimuli as determinants of blocking in human electrodermal conditioning.European perspectives in psychology.DrenthP. J. D.SergeantJ. A.TakensR. J.Chichester: WileyVol. 2, 409–423.
28.
PerlmuterL. C. (1966). Effect of CS manipulations on the conditioned eyelid response: Compounding, generalization, the inter-CS-interval, and pre-exposure.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements1, 271–286.
29.
ProkasyW. F.KumpferK. L. (1973). Classical conditioning.Electrodermal activity in psychological research.ProkasyW. F.RaskinD. C.New York: Academic Press157–202.
30.
RescorlaR. A. (1981). Within-signal learning in autoshaping.Animal Learning and Behavior9, 245–252.
31.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Classical conditioning. II. Current research and theory.BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts64–99.
32.
SchreursB. G.GormezanoI. (1982). Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to CS compounds: Effects of prior single-stimulus conditioning.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society19, 365–368.
33.
ShanksD. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37B, 1–21.
34.
SolomonP. R. (1977). Role of the hippocampus in blocking and conditioned inhibition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology91, 407–417.
35.
SpenceK. W. (1963). Cognitive factors in the extinction of the conditioned eyelid response in humans.Science140, 1224–1225.
36.
SpenceK. W. (1966). Cognitive and drive factors in the extinction of the conditioned eye blink in human subjects.Psychological Review73, 445–458.
37.
SpenceK. W.RossL. E. (1959). A methodological study of the form and latency of eyelid responses in conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology58, 376–381.
38.
ThompsonR. F.ClarkG. A.DoneganN. H.LavondD. G.LincolnJ. S.MaddenJ.IVMamounasL. A.MaukM. D.McCormickD. A.ThompsonJ. K. (1984). Neuronal substrates of learning and memory: A multiple-trace view.Neurobiology of learning and memory.LynchG.McGaughJ. L.WeinbergerN. M.New York: The Guilford Press137–164.
39.
WagnerA. R. (1969). Stimulus validity and stimulus selection.Fundamental issues in associative learning.MackintoshN. J.HonigW. K.Halifax: Dalhousie University Press90–122.
