Three experiments examined both the impact of semantic analysis of 50-msec, masked visual primes on a target response and the impact of semantic analysis of the target on a prime response. The first two experiments used a prime-target interval of 1000 msec. In Experiment 1, subjects reported the identity of each prime: (a) after a lexical decision about the target, (b) both before and after a lexical decision, or (c) after a target detection response. Prime report after both types of target response showed retroactive priming in which report was facilitated by related targets and inhibited by unrelated targets. Analyses of lexical decision latency and accuracy conditionalized on prime report showed that semantic priming was restricted to reported related primes. In Experiment 2, subjects made no overt response to the primes. Priming was conditionalized on recognition of the primes on a subsequent test. The pattern was the same as Experiment 1: There was priming only for recognized primes; recognition memory showed a pattern consistent with retroactive priming. Experiment 3 also conditionalized priming on recognition performance but used a prime-target interval of only 250 msec. Again, semantic priming was found only for recognized primes, and recognition memory revealed retroactive priming. Retroactive priming indicates an interdependency between prime and target processing that needs to be incorporated into models of semantic priming.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportD. A.TipperS. P.ChmielN. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and post-categorical filtering. Attention and performance XI.PosnerM. I.MarinO. S. M.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.107–132.
2.
BalotaD. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior22, 88–104.
3.
BalotaD. A.LorchR. F.Jr. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition12, 336–345.
4.
BeckerC. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition8, 493–512.
BriandK.den HeyerK.DannenbringG. L. (1988). Retroactive semantic priming in a lexical decision task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology40A, 341–359.
7.
CarrT. H.McCauleyC.SperberR. D.ParmeleeC. M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and automaticity of information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance8, 757–777.
8.
CheesmanJ.MerikleP. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics36, 387–395.
9.
ClarkH. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior12, 335–359.
10.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review82, 407–428.
11.
CowanN. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin104, 163–191.
12.
DagenbachD.CarrT. H.WilhelmsenA. (1989). Task-induced strategies and near-threshold priming: Conscious influences on unconscious perception. Journal of Memory and Language28, 412–443.
13.
DarkV. J. (1988). Semantic priming, prime reportability, and retroactive priming are interdependent. Memory & Cognition16, 299–308.
14.
DarkV. J.JohnstonW. A.Myles-WorsleyM.FarahM. J. (1985). Levels of selection and capacity limits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General114, 472–497.
15.
de GrootA. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology36A, 253–280.
16.
de GrootA. M. B. (1985). Word-context effects in word naming and lexical decision. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37A, 281–297.
17.
den HeyerK.BriandK.DannenbringG. L. (1983). Strategic factors in a lexical decision task: Evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes. Memory & Cognition11, 374–381.
18.
DixonN. F. (1981). Preconscious processingNew York: Wiley.
19.
EichE. (1984). Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness. Memory & Cognition12, 105–111.
20.
ElliotP. B. (1964). Tables of d'. Signal detection and recognition by human observers.SwetsJ. A.New York: Wiley651–684.
21.
EvettL. J.HumphreysG. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology33A, 325–350.
22.
FischlerI.GoodmanG. O. (1978). Latency of associated activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance4, 455–470.
23.
FiskA. D.SchneiderW. (1984). Memory as a function of attention, level of processing, and automatization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition10, 181–197.
24.
FoltzG. S.PoltrockS. E. (1985). Apple pascal tester version II (APT II): An experiment development systemAustin, TX: Authors [Software manual].
25.
FowlerC. A.WolfordG.SladeR.TassinaryL. (1981). Lexical access with and without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General110, 341–362.
26.
GlucksbergS.KreuzR. J.RhoS. H. (1986). Context can constrain lexical access: Implications for models of language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition12, 323–335.
27.
GreenD. M.SwetsJ. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysicsNew York: Wiley.
28.
GreenwaldA. G.KlingerM. R.LiuT. J. (1989). Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words. Memory & Cognition17, 35–47.
29.
GrossbergS.StoneG. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning, and resonance. Psychological Review93, 46–74.
30.
HirshmanE.GomesH. (1989). A model of word recognition Unpublished manuscript.
31.
HoffmanJ. E.MacMillanF. W. (1985). Is semantic priming automatic?. Attention and performance XI.PosnerM. I.MarinO. S. M.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.585–599.
32.
HolenderD. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences9, 1–66.
33.
HuntE.LansmanM. (1986). Unified Model of attention and problem solving. Psychological Review93, 446–461.
34.
IrwinD. I.LupkerS. J. (1983). Semantic priming of pictures and words: A levels of processing approach. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior22, 45–60.
35.
JacobsonJ. Z. (1973). Effects of association upon masking and reading latency. Canadian Journal of Psychology27, 58–69.
36.
JohnstonW. A.DarkV. J. (1982). In defense of intraperceptual theories of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance8, 407–421.
37.
JohnstonW. A.DarkV. J. (1985). Dissociable domain of selective processing. Attention and performance XI.PosnerM. I.MarinO. S. M.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.567–583.
38.
JohnstonW. A.DarkV. J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology37, 43–75.
39.
KahnemanD.TreismanA. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. Varieties of attention.ParasuramanR.DavisR.Orlando, FL: Academic Press29–61.
40.
KigerI.GlassL. (1983). The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target. Memory & Cognition11, 356–365.
41.
KoriatA. (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decisions as a function of prime-target association. Memory & Cognition9, 587–598.
42.
KučeraH.FrancisW. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American EnglishProvidence, RI: Brown University Press.
43.
LabergeD. (1975). Acquistion of automatic processing in perceptual and associative learning. Attention and performance V.RabbittP. M. A.DornicS.London: Academic Press50–64.
44.
LoganG. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review95, 492–527.
45.
LorchR. F.Jr.BalotaD. A.StammE. G. (1986). Locus of inhibition effects in the priming of lexical decisions: Pre- or postlexical access?. Memory & Cognition14, 95–103.
46.
MarcelJ. (1983a). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology15, 197–237.
47.
MarcelJ. (1983b). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology15, 238–300.
48.
MassonM. E. J. (1990). A distributed memory model of context effects in word identification. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition.BesnerD.HumphreysG. W.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.233–263.
49.
NeelyJ. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibition-less spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology106, 226–254.
50.
NeelyJ. H. (1990). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition.BesnerD.HumphreysG. W.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.264–336.
51.
NeelyJ. H.KeefeD. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory.BowerG. H.New York: Academic Press Vol. 23.
52.
NeumannO. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. Cognition and motor processes.PrinzW.SandersA. F.Berlin: Springer-Verlag255–293.
53.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review84, 231–279.
54.
NorrisD. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming. Cognition22, 93–136.
55.
PoltrockS. E.FoltzG. S. (1982). An experimental psychology laboratory for the Apple II microcomputer. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation14, 103–108.
56.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975a). Attention and cognitive control. Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium.SolsoR. L.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.55–85.
57.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975b). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. Attention and performance V.RabbittP. M. A.DornicS.London: Academic Press669–682.
58.
RatcliffR.McKoonG. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review95, 385–408.
59.
SeidenbergM. S.WatersG. S.SandersM.LangerP. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition12, 315–328.
60.
SchneiderW. (1985). Toward a model of attention and the development of automatic processing. Attention and performance XI.PosnerM. I.MarinO. S. M.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.475–492.
61.
SchneiderW.DumaisS. T.ShiffrinR. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. Varieties of attention.ParasuramanR.DaviesD. R.Orlando, FL: Academic Press1–27.
62.
SchvaneveldtR. W.MeyerD. E. (1973). Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory. Attention and performance IV.KornblumS.New York: Academic Press395–409.
63.
ShiffrinR. M. (1988). Attention. Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology.AtkinsonR. C.HerrnsteinR. J.LindseyG.LuceR. D.New York: Wiley Vol. 2, 739–811.
64.
ShiffrinR. M.SchneiderW. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review84, 127–190.
65.
SmithM. C. (1979). Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5, 239–251.
66.
SmithM. C.TheodorL.FranklinP. E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition9, 697–712.
67.
TipperS. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37A, 571–590.
68.
TipperS. P.DriverJ. (1988). Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Memory & Cognition16, 64–70.
69.
Van der HeijdenA. H. C.HagenarrR.BloemW. (1984). Two stages in postcategorical filtering and selection. Memory & Cognition12, 458–467.
70.
WestR. F.StanovichK. E. (1982). Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory8, 385–399.
