Dual process theory postulates two representational processes: Activation of a representation makes the mental event more easily and automatically accessible. Elaboration of a mental event produces access to the representation through search and retrieval processes. We explored word priming in recognition and in a stem completion task where the primed word was one of several possible completions for a 3-letter stem. The main hypothesis was that priming has similar and parallel effects in the two tasks. The initial presentation (priming) of items was under conditions of either semantic or non-semantic processing. Priming was either direct, by the presentation of the target word, or indirect, by the presentation of phonologically related (rhyming) or semantically related (categorical) items. When priming occurred, RTs increased from direct to phonologically primed and to semantically primed items for both completion and recognition tests. One additional experiment confirmed the absence of semantic processing in the non-semantic condition, and another experiment showed that when response requirements for recognition and completion responses are equated, RTs to the two tests are comparable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartlettJ. C.GernsbacherM. A.TillR. E. (1987). Remembering left-right orientation of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition13, 27–35.
2.
BattigW. F.MontagueW. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph80, (3, Pt.2).
3.
DannenbringG. L.BriandK. (1983). Semantic priming and the word repetition effect in a lexical decision task. Canadian Journal of Psychology36, 435–444.
4.
EllisA. W.YoungA. W.FludeB. M.HayD. C. (1987). Repetition priming of face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology39A, 193–210.
5.
GrafP.MandlerG. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior23, 553–568.
6.
GrafP.MandlerG.HadenP. (1982). Simulating amnesic symptoms in normal subjects. Science218, 1243–1244.
7.
GrafP.SquireL. R.MandlerG. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition10, 164–178.
8.
HashtroudiS.FergusonS. A.RappoldV. A.ChrosniakL. D. (1988). Data-driven and conceptually driven processes in partial-word identification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition14, 749–757.
9.
HintonG. E. (1981). Implementing semantic networks in parallel hardware. Parallel models of associative memory.HintonG. E.AndersonJ. A.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.161–187.
10.
HirstW.JohnsonM. K.PhelpsE. A.VolpeB. T. (1988). More on recognition and recall in amnesics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition14, 758–762.
11.
JacobyL. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition9, 21–38.
12.
JacobyL. L.WoloshynV.KellyC. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118, 115–125.
13.
JohnsonM. K.KimJ. K. (1985). Recognition of pictures by alcoholic Korsakoff patients. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society23, 456–458.
14.
JuolaJ. F.FischlerI.WoodC. T.AtkinsonR. C. (1971). Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory. Perception and Psychophysics10, 8–14.
15.
KuceraH.FrancisW. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American EnglishProvidence, RI: Brown University Press.
16.
LeesG. (1981). The modern rhyming dictionaryGreenwich, CT: Cherry Lane.
17.
MandlerG. (1979). Organization and repetition: Organizational principles with special reference to rote learning. Perspectives on memory research.NilssonL.-G.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18.
MandlerG. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review87, 252–271.
19.
MandlerG. (1985). From association to structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition11, 464–468.
20.
MandlerG. (1987). Determinants of recognition. Knowledge aided information processing.HoffmannJ.van der MeerE.Amsterdam: North Holland.
MandlerG. (in press). Your face looks familiar but I can't remember your name: A review of dual process theory. Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock.HockleyW. E.LewandowskyS.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23.
MandlerG.BoeckW. (1974). Retrieval processes in recognition. Memory and Cognition2, 613–615.
24.
MandlerG.GrafP.KraftD. (1986). Activation and elaboration effects in recognition and word priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology38A, 645–662.
25.
MandlerG.PearlstoneZ.KoopmansH. J. (1969). Effects of organization and semantic similarity on recall and recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior8, 410–423.
26.
MandlerG.RabinowitzJ. C. (1981). Appearance and reality: Does a recognition test really improve subsequent recall and recognition?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory7, 79–90.
27.
McKoonG.RatcliffR.VerwoerdM. (1986). A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society24, 323.
28.
OversonC.MandlerG. (1987). Indirect word priming in connected semantic and phonological contexts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society25, 229–232.
29.
RabinowitzJ. C.MandlerG.BarsalouL. W. (1979). Generation-recognition as an auxiliary retrieval strategy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18, 57–72.
30.
Richardson-KlavehnA.BjorkR. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology.RosenzweigM. R.PorterL. W.Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc.Volume 39.
31.
SchacterD. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition13, 501–518.
32.
SquireL. R.ShimamuraA. P.GrafP. (1985). Independence of recognition memory and priming effects: A neuropsychological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition11, 37–44.
33.
TulvingE.SchacterD. L.StarkH. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition8, 336–342.
34.
WarringtonE. K.McCarthyR. A. (1987). The fractionation of retrograde amnesia Unpublished paper.
