The present study examined the pragmatic reasoning schema theory of deductive reasoning—specifically, its explanation of performance on the selection task. Experiment 1 replicated a result crucial to the theory, the finding of facilitation on abstract versions of the selection task based on pragmatic reasoning schemas. However, Experiments 2, 3, and 4 established that this facilitation was dependent upon two presentation factors: (1) the presence of explicit negatives on the NOT P and NOT Q cards and (2) the inclusion of a checking context in the problem statement. These results are discussed in terms of Evans's two-stage (heuristic/analytic processing) model of reasoning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeattieJ.BaronJ. (1988). Confirmation and matching biases in hypothesis testing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology40A, 269–297.
2.
ChengP. W.HolyoakK. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology17, 391–416.
3.
ChengP. W.HolyoakK. J.NisbettR. E.OliverL. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology18, 293–328.
4.
ChrostowskiJ. J.GriggsR. A. (1985). The effects of problem content, instructions, and verbalization procedure on Wason's selection task. Current Psychological Research & Reviews4, 99–107.
5.
CohenL. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences4, 317–370.
6.
EvansJ. St. B. T. (1972). Interpretation and matching bias in a reasoning task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology24, 193–199.
7.
EvansJ. St. B. T. (1982). The psychology of deductive reasoningLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
EvansJ. St. B.T. (1983). Linguistic determinants of bias in conditional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology35 A, 635–644.
9.
EvansJ. St. B.T. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology75, 451–468.
10.
EvansJ. St. B. T.LynchJ. S. (1973). Matching bias in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology64, 391–397.
11.
FinocchiaroM. A. (1980). Galileo and the art of reasoningDordrecht: Reidel.
12.
GriggsR. A. (1983). The role of problem content in the selection task and THOG problem. Thinking and reasoning: Psychological approaches.EvansJ. St. B. T.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul16–43.
13.
GriggsR. A. (1984). Memory cueing and instructional effects on Wason's selection task. Current Psychological Research & Reviews3, 3–10.
14.
GriggsR. A. (1989). To “see” or not to “see”: That is the selection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology41a, 517–529.
15.
GriggsR. A.CoxJ. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason's selection task. British Journal of Psychology73, 407–20.
16.
GriggsR. A.JacksonS. L. (1989). Instructional effects on responses in the selection task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17.
GriggsR. A.RansdellS. E. (1986). Scientists and the selection task. Social Studies of Science16, 319–330.
18.
JacksonS. L.GriggsR. A. (1988). Education and the selection task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society26, 327–330.
19.
Johnson-LairdP. N.LegrenziP.LegrenziM. S. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology63, 395–400.
20.
ManktelowK. I.EvansJ. St. B. T. (1979). Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non-effect?. British Journal of Psychology70, 477–488.
21.
MargolisH. (1987). Patterns, thinking, and cognition: A theory of judgmentChicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
PollardP. (1982). Human reasoning: Some possible effects of availability. Cognition12, 65–96.
23.
PollardP.EvansJ. St. B. T. (1987). Content and context effects in reasoning. American Journal of Psychology100, 41–60.
24.
StaudenmayerH.BourneL. E.Jr. (1978). The nature of denied propositions in the conditional sentence reasoning task: Interpretation and learning. Human reasoning.RevlinR.MayerR. E.Washington, DC: V. H. Winston & Sons83–99.
25.
ValentineE. R. (1985). The effect of instructions on performance in the Wason selection task. Current Psychological Research & Reviews4, 214–223.
26.
Van DuyneP. C. (1974). Realism and linguistic complexity in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology65, 59–67.
WasonP. C. (1966). Reasoning. New horizons in psychology.FossB. M.Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
29.
WasonP. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20, 273–281.
30.
WasonP. C. (1977). The theory of formal operations—A critique. Piaget and knowing: Studies in genetic epistemology.GeberB. A.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul119–135.
31.
WasonP. C. (1983). Realism and rationality in the selection task. Thinking and reasoning: Psychological approaches.EvansJ. St. B. T.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul44–75.
32.
WasonP. C.ShapiroD. (1971). Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology23, 63–71.
33.
WetherickN. E. (1970). On the representativeness of some experiments on cognition. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society23, 213–214.
34.
YachaninS. A. (1986). Facilitation in Wason's selection task: Content and instructions. Current Psychological Research & Reviews5, 20–29.
35.
YachaninS. A.TweneyR. D. (1982). The effect of thematic content on cognitive strategies in the four-card selection task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society19, 87–90.
