Human subjects and non-human primates (the common marmoset) were trained on a series of reversals of both a simple (stimuli varying along one dimension) and compound (stimuli varying along two different dimensions) visual discrimination, using computer-generated stimuli. They were then shifted to a third series of reversals using completely novel compound stimuli. Those humans and marmosets for which the previously relevant dimension remained relevant, following the shift (shapes to shapes or lines to lines; intradimensional shift) made fewer errors than those for which the previously irrelevant dimension became relevant (shapes to lines or lines to shapes; extradimensional shift). These findings suggest that both humans and marmosets can learn to attend to the specific attributes or dimensions of a stimulus and use this information in visual discrimination learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CouvillonP. A.TennantW. A.BittermanM. E. (1976). Intradimensional vs. extradimensional transfer in the discriminative learning of goldfish and pigeons.Animal Learning and Behaviour4, 197–203.
2.
DurlachP. J.MackintoshN. J. (1986). Transfer of serial reversal learning in the pigeon.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology38B, 81–95.
3.
EimasP. D. (1966). Effects of overtraining and age on intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology3, 348–355.
4.
GrantD. A.BergE. A. (1948). A behavioural analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting problem.Journal of Experimental Psychology38, 404–411.
5.
HallG.ChannellS. (1985). A comparison of intradimensional and extradimensional shift learning in pigeons.Behavioral Processes10, 285–295.
6.
HarlowH. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets.Psychological Review56, 51–65.
7.
HouseB.ZeamanD. (1982). Reversal and nonreversal shifts in discrimination learning in retardates.Journal of Experimental Psychology63, 444–451.
8.
IsaacsI.DuncanC. P. (1962). Reversal and nonreversal shifts within and between dimensions in concept formation.Journal of Experimental Psychology64, 580–585.
9.
MackintoshN. J. (1962). The effects of overtraining on a reversal and nonreversal shift.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology55, 555–559.
10.
MackintoshN. J.LittleL. (1969a). Intradimensional and extradimensional shift learning by pigeons.Psychonomic Science14, 5–6.
11.
MackintoshN. J.LittleL. (1969b). Selective attention and response strategies as factors in serial reversal learning.Canadian Journal of Psychology23, 335–346.
12.
MacphailE. M. (1982). Brain and intelligence in vertebratesOxford: Clarendon Press.
13.
MedinD. L. (1975). A theory of context in discrimination learning.Psychology of Learning and Motivation9, 263–315.
14.
MilesR. C.MeyerD. R. (1956). Learning sets in marmosets.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology49, 219–222.
15.
MilnerB. (1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting.Archives of Neurology9, 100–110.
16.
PassinghamR. E. (1972). Non-reversal shifts after selective prefrontal ablations in monkeys (Macaca Mulatta).Neuropsychologia10, 41–46.
17.
PearceJ. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review94, 61–73.
18.
RidleyR. M.HaysteadT. A. J.BakerH. F. (1980). An analysis of visual object reversal learning in the marmoset after amphetamine and haloperidol.Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behaviour14, 345–351.
19.
RobbinsD.BarresiJ.ComptonP.FurstA.RussoM.SmithM. A. (1978). The genesis and use of examplar vs. prototype knowledge in abstract category learning.Memory and Cognition6, 473–480.
20.
RothblatL. A.WilsonW. A. (1968). Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in the monkey within and across sensory modalities.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology66, 549–553.
21.
SheppB. E.EimasP. D. (1964). Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology57, 357–361.
22.
SheppB. E.SchrierA. M. (1969). Consecutive intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in monkeys.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology67, 199–203.
23.
SlameckaN. J. (1968). A methodological analysis of shift pradigms in human discrimination learning.Psychological Bulletin69, 423–438.
24.
SutherlandN. S. (1959). Stimulus analysing mechanisms.Proceedings of a symposium on the mechanization of thought processesLondon: Her Majesty's Stationery OfficeVol. 2, 575–609.
25.
SutherlandN. S.MackintoshN. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learningNew York: Academic Press.
26.
TravisD. S.BowmakerJ. K.MollonJ. D. (1985). Polymorphism of retinal pigments in the common marmoset.Callithrix jacchus). Perception14, A16.
27.
WinerB. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. 2nd EditionLondon: McGraw Hill.
28.
ZeamanD.HouseB. J. (1963). The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning.Handbook of mental deficiency.EllisN. R.New York: McGraw-Hill159–223.
29.
ZeamanD.HouseB. J. (1979). A review of attention theory.Handbook of mental deficiency, psychological theory and research, 2nd Edition.EllisN. R.New York: McGraw Hill63–120.
