Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In two experiments rats were initially trained with one conditioned stimulus (CS) signalling food and another CS signalling water. The main purpose of the experiments was to examine the effects of presenting these stimuli in compound. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the level of conditioned responding to this compound was equal to that of a group for which the compound was composed of elements that had separately signalled the same reinforcer. Moreover, the level of this responding was greater than for a group that had received only compound conditioning. In the second experiment it was found that after the initial training, repeatedly pairing the compound with a single reinforcer resulted in an equivalent loss of conditioned responding to both elements. These findings suggest that the interaction between conditioned stimuli for food and water is facilitatory rather than inhibitory.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolles

R. C.

Morlock

(1960). Some asymmetrical drive phenomena. Psychological Record 6, 373–378.

Capaldi

E. D.

Hovancik

J. R.

Lamb

E. O.

(1975). The effects of strong irrelevant thirst on food-rewarded instrumental performance. Animal Learning and Behaviour 3, 172–178.

Dickinson

(1977). Appetitive-aversive interactions: Superconditioning of fear by an appetitive CS. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29, 71–83.

Kendler

H. H.

(1945). Drive interaction: I. Learning as a function of the simultaneous presence of hunger and thirst drives. Journal of Experimental Psychology 35, 96–109.

Kamin

L. J.

Gaioni

S. J.

(1974). Compound conditioned emotional response conditioning with differentially salient elements in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 87, 591–597.

Konorski

(1967). Integrative activity of the brain Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kremer

E. F.

(1978). The Rescorla-Wagner model: Losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 4, 22–36.

McFarland

D. J.

(1964). Interaction of hunger and thirst in the Barbary dove. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 58, 174–179.

McFarland

D. J.

(1969). Mechanisms of behavioural disinhibition. Animal Behaviour 17, 238–242.

10.

Ramachandran

Pearce

J. M.

(1987). Pavlovian analysis of interactions between hunger and thirst. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 13, 182–192.

11.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1970). Reduction in the effectiveness of reinforcement after prior excitatory conditioning. Learning and Motivation 1, 372–381.

12.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1971). Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement following prior inhibitory conditioning. Learning and Motivation 2, 113–123.

13.

Toates

F. M.

(1979). Water and energy in the interaction of thirst and hunger. Chemical influences on behaviour. Brown

Cooper

S. J.

London: Academic Press 135–200.

14.

Toates

F. M.

(1980). Animal behaviour: A systems approach New York: Wiley.

15.

Verplanck

W. S.

Hayes

J. R.

(1953). Eating and drinking as a function of maintenance schedule. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 46, 327–333.

16.

Wagner

A. R.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Applications of a theory. Inhibition and learning. Halliday

M. S.

Boakes

R. A.

London: Academic Press 301–336.

Interactions between Conditioned Stimuli for Food and Water in the Rat

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References