Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Rats learned to suppress lever pressing in the presence of a compound stimulus that signalled either response-independent shock (conditioned suppression) or response-dependent shock (punishment). Suppression to one element of this compound was blocked if the other element had previously signalled the same contingency as that holding in the presence of the compound. Two experiments, however, failed to find significant evidence of blocking if the pretrained element had signalled conditioned suppression and the compound signalled a punishment contingency. On the other hand, if one stimulus signalled punishment of one response it was able to block the acquisition of control by the second stimulus when the compound signalled punishment of a different response. Finally, although animals showed no suppression to one element of a compound signalling conditioned suppression if the other had previously signalled punishment, this apparent blocking effect concealed that what they learned was that the added element signalled the cancellation of the instrumental contingency. These results provide little support for the view that stimuli signalling punishment contingencies suppress responding in whole or in part by virtue of their Pavlovian relation to shock.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolles

R. C.

Holtz

Dunn

Hill

(1980). Comparisons of stimulus learning and response learning in a punishment situation. Learning and Motivation 11, 78–96.

Church

R. M.

Wooten

C. L.

Matthews

T. J.

(1970). Discriminative punishment and the conditioned emotional response. Learning and Motivation 1, 1–17.

Estes

W. K.

(1944). An experimental study of punishment. Psychological Monographs 57, (3, Whole No. 263).

Estes

W. K.

(1969). New perspectives on some old issues in association theory. Fundamental issues in associative learning. Mackintosh

N. J.

Honig

W. K.

Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University Press 162–189.

Garrud

Goodall

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1982). Overshadowing of a stimulus-reinforcer association by an instrumental response. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33B, 123–135.

Goodall

(1984). Learning due to the response-shock contingency in signalled punishment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36B, 259–279.

Gutman

Maier

S. F.

(1978). Operant and Pavlovian factors in cross-response transfer of inhibitory stimulus control. Learning and Motivation 9, 231–254.

Holland

P. C.

(1983). Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. Quantitative analysis of behavior: discrimination processes. Commons

M. L.

Herrnstein

R. J.

Wagner

A. R.

New York: Ballinger Vol. 4, 183–206.

Holman

J. G.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1981). The control of appetitive instrumental responding does not depend on classical conditioning to the discriminative stimulus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33B, 21–31.

10.

Hunt

H. F.

Brady

J. V.

(1955). Some effects of punishment and intercurrent “anxiety” on a simple operant. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 48, 305–310.

11.

Kamin

L. J.

(1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. Punishment and aversive behavior. Campbell

Church

New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 279–296.

12.

Karpicke

Christoph

Peterson

Hearst

(1977). Signal location and positive versus negative conditioned suppression in the rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 3, 105–118.

13.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1974). The psychology of animal learning London: Academic Press.

14.

Neuenschwander

Fabrigoule

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1987). Fear of the warning signal during overtraining of avoidance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 39, 23–33.

15.

Rawlins

J. N. P.

Feldon

Gray

J. A.

(1980). Distribution of response-contingent and response-independent shock by rats: Effects of chlordiaz-epoxide HCL and sodium amylobarbitone. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32, 215–232.

16.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin 72, 77–94.

17.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1979). Conditioned inhibition and extinction. Mechanisms of learning and motivation. Dickinson

Boakes

R. A.

Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 83–110.

18.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1985). Conditioned inhibition and facilitation. Information processing in animals: conditioned inhibition. Miller

R. R.

Spear

N. E.

Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 299–326.

19.

Ross

R. T.

LoLordo

V. M.

(1986). Blocking during serial feature-positive discriminations: Associative versus occasion setting functions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 12, 315–324.

20.

Schuster

Rachlin

(1968). Indifference between punishment and free shock: Evidence for the negative law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 11, 777–786.

21.

Skinner

B. F.

(1938). The behavior of organisms New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

22.

Starr

M. D.

Mineka

(1977). Determinants of fear over the course of avoidance learning. Learning and Motivation 8, 332–350.

23.

Stickney

K. J.

Donahoe

J. W.

(1983). Attenuation of blocking by a change in US locus. Animal Learning and Behavior 11, 60–66.

Analysis of the Pavlovian Properties of Signals for Punishment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References