The Priming of Word Associations: A Levels-of-Processing Approach

Abstract

Four experiments are reported in which the magnitude of the associative-priming effect is manipulated by varying both the experimental task and the conditions within a given task. The between-task manipulation involved a comparison of priming effects in length categorization on the one hand and lexical decision on the other. The within-task manipulation involved varying the type of letter strings presented as the nonword stimuli in lexical decisions. Pseudowords and two types of orthographically illegal letter strings—namely, consonant strings and random letter strings—served as nonwords. Finally, the effect of varying the proportion of pseudowords to illegal nonwords across four sets of experimental materials was investigated. On the whole, these within-and between-task manipulations turned out to be very effective ways of affecting the size of the associative-priming effect. Also, the size of the lexicality effect (the difference between the RTs to word and nonword stimuli) varied systematically with these within-and between-task manipulations. The results are discussed in relation to both Shulman and Davison's (1977) parallel-processing model and Balota and Chumbley's (1984) account of lexical decision.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balota

D. A.

Chumbley

J. I.

(1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 340–357.

Chumbley

J. I.

Balota

D. A.

(1984). A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory & Cognition 12, 590–606.

Craik

F. I. M.

Lockhart

R. S.

(1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 671–684.

Craik

F. I. M.

Tulving

(1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 268–294.

Flores

d'Arcais G. B.

Schreuder

Glazenborg

(1985). Semantic activation during recognition of referential words. Psychological Research 47, 39–49.

Forster

K. I.

(1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. New approaches to language mechanisms. Wales

R. J.

Walker

Amsterdam: North-Holland 257–287.

Forster

K. I.

(1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Cooper

W. E.

Walker

C. T.

Hillsdale, N.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 27–85.

Forster

K. I.

(1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33A, 465–495.

de Groot

A. M. B.

(1980). Mondelinge Woordassociatienormen Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

10.

de Groot

A. M. B.

(1985). Word-context effects in word naming and lexical decision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A, 281–297.

11.

Hudson

P. T. W.

Maarse

F. J. M.

Bouwhuisen

(1983). LEXSYS: A real-time multi-subject system for psycholinguistic experiments Report. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Nijmegen.

12.

James

C. T.

(1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 104, 130–136.

13.

Meyer

D. E.

Schvaneveldt

R. W.

(1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90, 227–234.

14.

Mitchell

D. C.

(1982). The process of reading: A cognitive analysis of fluent reading and learning to read Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.

15.

Neely

J. H.

(1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106, 226–254.

16.

Parkin

A. J.

(1979). Specifying levels of processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 31, 175–195.

17.

Schreuder

Flores

d'Arcais G. B.

Glazenborg

(1984). Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming. Psychological Research 45, 339–354.

18.

Shulman

H. G.

Davison

T. C. B.

(1977). Control properties of semantic coding in a lexical decision task. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 91–98.

19.

Shulman

H. G.

Hornak

Sanders

(1978). The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures. Memory & Cognition 6, 115–123.

20.

Smith

M. C.

Theodor

Franklin

P. E.

(1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9, 697–712.