Motion-detecting mechanisms: Dual input devices?

Abstract

Displacement thresholds for luminance step edges were measured for a wide range of contrasts and mean luminances. Thresholds for extended edges (longer than about 0.5°) are determined not by contrast but rather by the amplitude (L_max-L_min) of the luminance change produced by the displacement. Arguing from the standpoint of the Marr-Ullman model of movement detection, we had expected that thresholds might be jointly determined by both contrast and amplitude. Using a range of edges of different lengths, we found that differential effects of luminance and contrast can be revealed: for short edges (less than about 0.5°) thresholds are influenced by both amplitude and contrast, while for more extensive edges only amplitude has an influence. The results are consistent with the properties of a mechanism that has two separate inputs, one from a spatial operator that is contrast-dependent and one from a temporal operator that is amplitude-dependent. The spatial operator is markedly sensitive to changes in edge extent, the temporal operator much less so. The output of the spatial operator saturates early as a function of contrast.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelson

E. H.

Bergen

J. R.

(1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A2, 284–299.

Anstis

S. M.

(1967). Adaptation to gradual change of intensity. Science 155, 710–712.

Barlow

H. B.

Levick

W. R.

(1965). The mechanism of directionally selective units in the rabbit's retina. Journal of Physiology 178, 477–504.

Foster

D. H.

(1971). A model of the human visual system in its response to certain classes of moving stimuli. Kybernetik 8, 69–84.

Hanley

Mackay

D. M.

(1979). Polarity-sensitive temporal adaptation to temporal sawtooth modulation of luminance. Experimental Brain Research 35, 37–46.

Hubel

D. H.

Wiesel

T. N.

(1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160, 106–154.

Kelly

D. H.

(1972). Adaptation effects on spatio-temporal sinewave thresholds. Vision Research 12, 89–101.

Krauskopf

(1980). Discrimination and detection of changes in luminance. Vision Research 20, 671–678.

Legge

Campbell

F. W.

(1981). Displacement detection in human vision. Vision Research 21, 671–678.

10.

Marr

(1982). Vision San Francisco: Freeman.

11.

Marr

Ullman

(1981). Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B211, 151–180.

12.

Morgan

M. J.

(1979). Perception of continuity in stroboscopic motion: A temporal frequency analysis. Vision Research 19, 491–500.

13.

Morgan

M. J.

Regan

(1987). Opponent model for line interval discrimination: Interval and vernier performance compared. Vision Research 27, 107–118.

14.

Moulden

Begg

(1986). Some tests of the Marr-Ullman model of movement perception. Perception 15, 139–155.

15.

Regan

Beverley

K. I.

(in press). Postadaptation orientation discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A2.

16.

Reichardt

(1961). Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information processing by the central nervous system. Rosenblith

W. A.

Sensory communication. New York: Wiley.

17.

van Santen

J. P. H.

Sperling

(1984). A temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A1, 451–473.

18.

Sidwell

(1983). Temporal contrast analysis in human vision University of Durham Unpublished PhD thesis.

19.

Watson

A. B.

Ahumada

A. J.

(1984). A model of how humans sense image motion. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 25, 14.

20.

Watt

R. J.

Morgan

M. J.

(1984). Spatial filters and the location of luminance changes in human vision. Vision Research 14, 1387–1397.

21.

Westheimer

(1976). Diffraction theory and visual hyperacuity. American Journal of Optometry 53, 362–364.