Distinguishing between New and used Traces: Differential Effects of Electroconvulsive Shock on Memories for Places Presented and Places Passed

Abstract

In a radial maze test of spatial memory, rats enter relatively novel arms while avoiding locations visited a few hours earlier. Certainly, new memories are acquired for arms entered during the retention test. However, the mnemonic consequences of avoiding arms previously entered are not as clearly predicted; old memories might remain unchanged and yet guide behavior, or the use of old memories during a retention test might renew such memories. The possibilities were evaluated in two experiments in which rats performed in a 12-arm radial maze. Each day the arms were randomly sorted into three sets: A, B, C. Each trial began with forced choices of the 4 arms in Set A and ended after 4 hr in an 8-choice test in which the 4 arms not yet visited (Set B) contained food reward. When electroconvulsive shock (ECS) occurred immediately after Set A choices, accuracy during the test was high; when ECS was administered 2 hr after Set A, choices during the test were less accurate. Old memories therefore appear to be more susceptible than new memories to ECS-induced amnesia. In other trials, an extra retention test was given at the mid-point (2 hr) of the retention interval; this 8-choice test consisted of the remaining 4 arms (Set C) and the original 4 arms (Set A). When ECS was administered after the intermediate test, memory for arms in Set A was 2 hr old (but had just been used), while memory for arms in Set C was new (0 hr). The retention test 2 hr later (testing B vs. A or B vs. C) revealed that ECS had an amnestic effect on the recently used memory for arms in Set A but had no effect on the newly acquired memory for arms in Set C. With respect to ECS-induced amnesia, therefore, memories used in a retention test resemble memories that have aged more than memories that have been newly acquired.