Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Three monkeys with bilateral lesions of inferotemporal cortex and three unoperated controls (all previously sophisticated at visual discriminations) learned 60 discriminations between pairs of multi-featured computer-generated patterns. They then learned 5 problem sets, each composed of 5 pairs of the same kind learned concurrently, and finally 20 more single discriminations.

Previous reports that inferotemporal lesions selectively impair concurrent learning were disconfirmed; given practice at learning pairs concurrently, the inferotemporals learned these at a similar rate to single pairs. Analysis of intra-problem learning supported the suggestion that the lesion affects visual identification (the ability to distinguish objects within a large population) rather than visual association or memory.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brush

E. S.

Mishkin

Rosvold

H. E.

Effects of object preferences and aversions in discrimination learning in monkeys with frontal lesions.

Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 54, 319–325.

Butter

C. M.

Mishkin

Rosvold

H. E.

(1965). Stimulus generalization in monkeys with inferotemporal and lateral occipital lesions. Stimulus generalization. Mostofsky

D. I.

Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Chow

K. L.

(1954). Effects of temporal cortical ablation on visual discrimination learning sets in monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 47, 194–198.

Cowey

Gross

C. G.

(1970). Effects of foveal prestriate and inferotemporal lesions on visual discrimination by rhesus monkeys. Experimental Brain Research 11, 128–144.

Dean

(1976). Effects of inferotemporal lesions on the behaviour of monkeys. Psychological Bulletin 83, 41–71.

Gaffan

Harrison

Gaffan

E. A.

(1986). Visual identification following inferotemporal ablation in the monkey. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 38B, 5–30.

Gaffan

Saunders

Gaffan

E. A.

Harrison

Shields

Owen

M. J.

(1984). Effects of fornix transection upon associative memory in monkeys: Role of the hippocampus in learned action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36B, 173–221.

Gross

C. G.

(1973). Visual functions of inferotemporal cortex. Handbook of sensory physiology. Jung

Berlin: Springer-Verlag Vol 7, Pt. 3B.

Gross

C. G.

(1978). Inferior temporal lesions do not impair discrimination of rotated patterns in monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 92, 1095–1109.

10.

Harlow

H. F.

(1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review 56, 51–65.

11.

Iversen

S. D.

Weiskrantz

(1967). Perception of redundant cues by monkeys with inferotemporal lesions. Nature 214, 241–243.

12.

Iwai

Mishkin

(1968). Two visual foci in the temporal lobe of monkeys. Neurophysiological basis of learning and behaviour. Yoshii

Buchwald

N. A.

Osaka: Osaka University Press.

13.

Jones

R. E.

Vaught

R. S.

Weinrott

(1977). Time series analysis in operant research. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 10, 151–166.

14.

Kikuchi

Iwai

(1980). The locus of the posterior subdivision of the inferotemporal visual learning area in the monkey. Brain Research 198, 347–360.

15.

Manning

F. J.

(1971). Punishment for errors and visual discrimination learning by monkeys with inferotemporal cortex lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 75, 146–152.

16.

Mishkin

(1972). Cortical visual areas and their interactions. Brain and human behaviour. Karczmar

A. G.

Eccles

J. C.

Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

17.

Wilson

W. A.

Mishkin

(1959). Comparison of the effect of inferotemporal and lateral occipital lesions on visually guided behaviour in monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 52, 10–17.

Single and Concurrent Discrimination Learning by Monkeys after Lesions of Inferotemporal Cortex

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References