Some Observed Differences in Degree of Concentration and Their Effects on Shadowing

Abstract

Three shadowing experiments investigated the hypothesis that difficulties in concentration are caused by internal factors as well as by the novelty, intensity or salience of background events. On the last trial of each experiment, a background message, which subjects had been instructed to ignore, changed unexpectedly. Most subjects noticed these changes and were disrupted by them (Experiments 1, 2 and 3). A smaller number of “concentrators” reported that they were unaware the changes had taken place. These concentrators were less disrupted by the background message than the non-concentrators both on the last trial and on earlier dichotic trials (Experiments 1 and 3). However, even concentrators were momentarily disrupted by the background changes (Experiment 3). Increased attended task difficulty increases the likelihood that subjects will fail to notice the changes (Experiment 2). The results support the view that good concentration consists in the ability to keep distracting events from consciousness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernstein

A. S.

(1968). The orienting response and the direction of stimulus change. Psychonomic Science 12, 127–128.

Broadbent

D. E.

(1958). Perception and communication Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Broadbent

D. E.

(1971). Decision and stress London: Academic Press.

Cassell

E. E.

Dallenbach

K. M.

(1918). The effect of auditory distraction upon the sensory reaction. American Journal of Psychology 29, 129–143.

Cherry

E. C.

(1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 975–979.

Corteen

R. S.

Wood

(1972). Autonomic responses for shock-associated words in an unattended channel. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94, 308–313.

Dawson

M. E.

Schell

A. M.

(1982). Electrodermal responses to attended and nonattended significant stimuli during dichotic listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8, 315–324.

Deutsch

J. A.

Deutsch

(1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review 70, 80–90.

Eysenck

M. W.

(1982). Attention and arousal Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

10.

Fisher

(1972). A “distraction effect” of noise bursts. Perception 1, 223–236.

11.

Ford

(1929). Attention-automatization. An investigation of the transitional nature of mind. American Journal of Psychology 41, 1–32.

12.

Hamilton

(1859). Lectures on metaphysics Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood and Sons.

13.

Hovey

H. B.

(1928). Effects of general distraction on the higher thought processes. American Journal of Psychology 40, 585–591.

14.

James

(1890). Principles of psychology New York: Henry Holt and Co.

15.

Johnston

W. A.

Dark

V. J.

(1982). In defence of intraperceptual theories of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8, 407–421.

16.

Johnston

W. A.

Heinz

S. P.

(1979). Depth of nontarget processing in an attention task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5, 168–175.

17.

Kahneman

(1973). Attention and effort Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N. J 1973.

18.

Kahneman

Treisman

A. M.

(1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. Parasuraman

Davies

D. R.

Varieties of attention. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press 29–61.

19.

Landis

Hunt

W. A.

(1939). The startle pattern New York: Farrar Press.

20.

Moray

(1970). Attention: Selective processes in vision and hearing New York: Academic Press.

21.

Neisser

(1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology San Francisco, Calif.: W. H. Freeman and Company.

22.

Pashler

(1984). Evidence against late selection: Stimulus quality effects in previewed displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 429–448.

23.

Poulton

E. C.

(1956). Listening to overlapping calls. Journal of Experimental Psychology 52, 334–339.

24.

Schneider

Shiffrin

R. M.

(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing I: Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84, 1–64.

25.

Siddle

D. A. T.

Spinks

J. A.

(1979). Orienting response and information-processing: Some theoretical and empirical problems. Kimmel

H. D.

Van Olst

E. H.

Orlebeke

J. F.

The orienting reflex in humans. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 473–497.

26.

Sokolov

E. N.

(1960). Neuronal models and the orienting reflex. Brazier

M. A. B.

The central nervous system and behaviour. New York: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.

27.

Treisman

A. M.

(1964a). The effect of irrelevant material on the efficiency of selective listening. American Journal of Psychology 77, 533–546.

28.

Treisman

A. M.

(1964b). Verbal cues, language and meaning in selective attention. American Journal of Psychology 77, 206–219.