Rats’ lever presses on a retractable lever earned brief presentations of discriminative stimuli signalling periods in which responding on an alternative lever was either non-reinforced (extinction) or reinforced on a random ratio schedule. The predictions of two theoretical accounts of this behaviour were tested by studying the effects of omitting either the stimulus signalling the reinforced or that signalling the non-reinforced schedule component. Under these conditions rats’ behaviour is determined by the conditioned, affective properties of the stimuli rather than by their purely informational properties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlanchardR. (1975). The effect of S– on observing behavior. Learning and Motivation6, 1–10.
2.
BloomfieldT. M. (1972). Reinforcement schedules: Contingency or contiguity. GilbertR. M.MillensonJ. R.Reinforcement: Behavioral analysis.New York: Academic Press.
3.
DickinsonA.DearingM. F. (1979). Appetitive-aversive interactions and inhibitory processes. DickinsonA.BoakesR. A.Mechanisms of learning and motivation.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
4.
DinsmoorJ. A.BrowneM. P.LawrenceC. E. (1972). A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior18, 79–85.
5.
FantinoE. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. HonigW. K.StaddonJ. E. R.Handbook of operant behavior.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.
6.
GrayJ. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal systemOxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
LiebermanD. A. (1972). Observing behavior in mixed schedules by monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Learning and Motivation3, 341–358.
8.
MackintoshN. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learningLondon: Academic Press259.
9.
MillensonJ. R. (1975). System developments in the ACT language: Towards machine independence. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation7, 165–173.
10.
MulvaneyD. E.HughesL. H.JwaidehA. R.DinsmoorJ. A. (1981). Differential production of positive and negative stimuli by normal and retarded children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology32, 389–400.
11.
PeroneM.BaronA. (1980). Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulus correlated with extinction or increased effort. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior34, 239–262.
12.
SchrierA. M.ThompsonC. R.SpectorN. R. (1980). Observing behavior in monkeys (Macaca arctoides): Support for the information hypothesis. Learning and Motivation355–365.
13.
WyckoffL. B.Jr (1952). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Psychological Review59, 431–442.
