An experiment is reported that investigated the effects of externalization of mental models in syllogistic reasoning. Although there was no evidence that the requirement to “externalize” mental models of syllogisms improved reasoning, an unexpected recognition test demonstrated that subjects’ memory for the meaning of the premises was improved by externalization. In particular, where the correct conclusion had been deduced using the externalization procedure, responses in the recognition test reflected an appreciation of the relations between the end terms of the premises.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeggI.DennyP. J. (1969). Empirical reconciliation of atmosphere and conversion interpretations of syllogistic reasoning errors.Journal of Experimental Psychology81, 351–354.
2.
ChapmanL. J.ChapmanJ. P. (1959). Atmosphere effect re-examined.Journal of Experimental Psychology58, 220–226.
3.
EricksonJ. R. (1974). A set analysis theory of behavior in formal syllogistic reasoning tasks.SolsoR.Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4.
EvansJ. St. B. T. (1982). The psychology of deductive reasoningLondon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5.
GuyoteM. J.SternbergR. J. (1981). A transitive-chain theory of syllogistic reasoning.Cognitive Psychology13, 461–525.
6.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousnessCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Johnson-LairdP. N.SteedmanM. J. (1978). The psychology of syllogisms.Cognitive Psychology10, 64–99.
8.
Johnson-LairdP. N.BaraB. (in press). Syllogistic inference.Cognition.
9.
Johnson-LairdP. N.WasonP. C. (1970). Insight into a logical relation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology22, 49–61.
10.
ManiK.Johnson-LairdP. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions.Memory and Cognition10, 181–187.
11.
MynattC. R.DohertyM. E.TureneyR. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology29, 85–95.
12.
NewellA. (1981). Reasoning, problem solving and decision processes: The problem space as a fundamental category.NickersonR.Attention and performance.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.8.
13.
RevlinR.LeirerV. O. (1978). The effect of personal biases on syllogistic reasoning: Rational decisions from personalized representations.RevlinR.MayerR. E.Human reasoning.New York: Wiley.
14.
RevlisR. (1975). Two models of syllogistic reasoning: Feature selection and conversion.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour14, 180–190.
15.
WasonP. C. (1968). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses … a second look.WasonP. C.Johnson-LairdP. N.Thinking of reasoning.Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
16.
WoodworthR. S.SellsS. B. (1935). An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology18, 451–460.
