In four experiments the interaction of grammatical subjectivization of a concept and placing a concept at the head of a cleft sentence has been studied. It has been assumed that on the speaker's part both features are the result of attention focusing and in the case of the listener serve to focus his attention. Further it has been assumed that the speaker might be expected to avoid sentences in which the “marked-off” concept is not at the same time subjectized and that the listener should be irritated by, and rate negatively, sentences with two competing attentional foci. The four experiments described in this paper confirmed these predictions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnisfeldM.KlenbortI. (1973). On the function of structural paraphrase: the view from the passive voice.Psychological Bulletin79, 117–26.
2.
CarpenterP. A.JustM. A. (1977). Reading comprehension as eyes see it.JustM. A.CarpenterP. A.Cognitive Processes in Comprehension.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
ClarkH. H. (1977). Inferences in comprehension.LabergeD. I.SamuelsS. J.Basic Processes in Reading.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum243–63.
4.
ClarkH. H.HavilandS. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract.FreedleR. O.Discourse Production and Comprehension.Noorwood, N.J.: AblexVol. i, 1–40.
5.
EngelkampJ. (1981). Given-new structure processing: Theoretical positions and empirical evidence.Flores d'ArcaisG. B.JarvellaR.The Process of Language Understanding.Chichester: Wiley (in press).
6.
EngelkampJ.KrumnackerH. (1978). The effect of cleft sentence structures on attention.Psychological Research40, 27–36.
7.
ErtelS. (1974). Satzsubjekt und Ich-Perspektive.EckensbergerL. H.EckensbergerU.Bericht über den 28. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie.Göttingen: Hogrefe.
8.
ErtelS. (1977). where do the subjects of sentences come from?.RosenbergS.Sentence production.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum141–68.
9.
HavilandS. E.ClarkH. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior13, 512–21.
10.
HornbyP. A. (1972). The psychological subject and predicate.Cognitive Psychology3, 632–42.
11.
HornbyP. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior13, 530–8.
12.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1968). The interpretation of the passive voice.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20, 69–73.
13.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1969). Reasoning with ambiguous sentences.British Journal of Psychology60, 17–23.
14.
KintschW. (1974). The Representation of Meaning in MemoryHillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
15.
LesgoldA. M.RothS. F.CurtisM. E. (1979). Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18, 291–308.
16.
OlsonD. R.FilbyN. (1972). On the comprehension of active and passive sentences.Cognitive Psychology3, 361–81.
17.
RumelhartD. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories.BobrowD. G.CollinsA.Representation and Understanding.New York: Academic Press211–36.
18.
ScintoL. F. (1978). Relation of eye fixations to old-new information of texts.SendersJ. W.FisherD. F.MontyR. A.Eye Movements and the Higher Psychological Functions.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum175–94.
19.
SingerM. (1976). Thematic structure and the integration of linguistic information.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior15, 549–58.
20.
SlobinD. J. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior5, 219–27.
21.
TannenbaumP. H.WilliamsF. (1968a). Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 246–56.
22.
TannenbaumP. H.WilliamsF. (1968b). Prompted word replacement in active and passive sentences.Language and Speech11, 220–29.
23.
TurnerE. A.RommetveitR. (1967). Experimental manipulation of the production of active and passive voice in children.Language and Speech10, 169–80.
24.
TurnerE. A.RommetveitR. (1968). Focus of attention in recall of active and passive sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 543–8.
25.
UrbanK. (1980). Zu einigen pragmatischen Variablen bei der Verwendung von Aktiv-vs-Passiv-Konstruktionen.Linguistische Berichte60, 69–83.
26.
ZimmerH. D.EngelkampJ. (1981). The given-new structure of cleft sentences and their influence on picture viewing.Psychological Research43, 375–389.
