The Effects of a Signal for free or for Earned Reward: Implications for the Role of Response-Reinforcer Associations in Instrumental Performance

Abstract

Pearce and Hall (1978) investigated the effects of making a brief flash of light contingent upon response in rats lever-pressing for food on a variable-interval (VI) schedule. When this signal occurred in conjunction only with reinforced responses the response rate was lowered with respect to a condition in which an equal number of light flashes occurred uncorrelated with reinforcement. The experiments reported here compared these effects with those produced by signalling “free” food deliveries in a similar way. Experiments I and II compared the effects of presenting correlated and uncorrelated schedules of light and food to rats given no opportunity to lever-press. The different schedules did not produce differences in response rate when the levers were made available. In Experiment III, free food was delivered to rats responding on a VI schedule. Signalling the delivery of earned food pellets produced a low response rate in comparison with a condition in which the free pellets were signalled. It is concluded that signalling food delivery is effective only when the rat must respond to earn the food and it is argued that the signal has its effect by overshadowing a response-reinforcer association.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolles

R. C.

(1972). Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning. Psychological Review 79, 394–409.

Hull

C. L.

(1943). Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Konorski

(1967). Integrative Activity of the Brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1974). The Psychology of Animal Learning. London: Academic Press.

Mackintosh

N. J.

Dickinson

(1979). Instrumental (type II) conditioning. Mechanisms of Learning and Motivation. Dickinson

Boakes

R. A.

Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Pearce

J. M.

Hall

(1978). Overshadowing the instrumental conditioning of a lever-press response by a more valid predictor of the reinforcer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 356–67.

Pearce

J. M.

Hall

(1979). The influence of context-reinforcer associations on instrumental performance. Animal Learning and Behavior, 7, 504–8.

Rescorla

R. A.

Solomon

R. L.

(1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151–82.

St. Claire-Smith

R. J.

(1979a). The overshadowing and blocking of punishment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 51–61.

10.

St. Claire-Smith

R. J.

(1979b). The overshadowing of instrumental conditioning by a stimulus that predicts reinforcement better than the response. Animal Learning and Behavior, 7, 224–8.

11.

Seger

K. A.

Scheuer

(1977). The informational properties of S₁, S₂, and the S₁–S₂ sequence on conditioned suppression. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 39–41.

12.

Trapold

M. A.

Overmier

J. B.

(1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. Black

A. H.

Prokasy

W. F.

New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.