Three experiments are reported on subject noun superiority in cued recall from S-V-O sentences. In Experiment I surface subjects were superior cues across a wide variety of conditions when the order of nouns/pronouns was matched in sentences and probes. The effect was less clear-cut in Experiment II, when cues and responses were confined to single key words.
The final experiment showed that cue superiority depends on the cue which subjects learn to use in retrieving information from sentences, and can be reversed by brief training. Several other aspects of the results, including a contrast in recall and recognition patterns, suggest that subject cue superiority results from the way subjects process remembered sentences rather than from memory trace structure. It is suggested that failure to control the utilisation of cues for memory retrieval may account for the sometimes elusive nature of the subject superiority effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonB. F. (1963). Short-term retention of active and passive sentencesJohns Hopkins University Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
2.
AndersonJ. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology6, 451–74.
3.
AndersonJ.BowerG. H. (1973). Human Associative MemoryNew York: Wiley.
4.
AndersonJ. (1976). Language, Memory and ThoughtNew York: Wiley.
5.
BlumenthalA. L. (1967). Prompted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior6, 203–6.
6.
BlumenthalA. L.BoakesR. (1967). Prompted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior6, 674–6.
7.
BroadbentD. E. (1971). Decision and StressLondon: Academic Press.
8.
ChomskyN. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of SyntaxCambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
9.
ClarkH. H.ClarkE. V. (1977). Psychology and Language: An Introduction to PsycholinguisticsNew York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.
10.
CoferC. N.ChmielewskiE.BrockwayJ. (1976). Constructive processes and the structure of human memory. In CoferC. N. (Ed.), The Structure of Human Memory.San Francisco: Freeman.
11.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review82, 407–28.
JamesC. (1972). Theme imagery in the recall of active and passive sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 205–11.
14.
JamesC.ThompsonT.BaldwinT. (1973). The reconstructive process in sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior12, 51–63.
15.
KeppelG. (1976). Words as random variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior15, 263–5.
16.
KintschW. (1974). The Representation of Meaning in MemoryNew York: Wiley.
17.
LeveltW.KempenL. (1975). Semantic and syntatic aspects of remembering sentences: A review of some recent continental research. In KennedyR.WilkesA. (Eds), Studies in Long-Term Memory.London: Wiley.
18.
LockhartR. S.CraikF. I. M.JacobyL. (1975). Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In BrownJ. (Ed.), Recall and Recognition.New York: Wiley.
19.
NormanD. A.RumelhartD. E. LNR Research Group (1975). Explorations in CognitionSan Francisco: Freeman.
20.
OlsonD. R.FilbyN. (1972). On comprehension of active and passive sentences. Cognitive Psychology3, 361–81.
21.
PaivioA.YuilleJ. C.MadiganS. (1968). Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement76, (1, Pt. 2).
22.
PerfettiC.GoldmanJ. (1974). Thematization and sentence retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior13, 70–9.
23.
RohrmanN. L. (1968). The role of syntactic structure in the recall of English nominalizations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 804–912.
24.
SchankR. C. (1975). Conceptual Information ProcessingNew York: Elsevier.
25.
TannenbaumP.WilliamsF. (1968). Prompted word replacement in active and passive sentences. Language and Speech11, 220–29.
26.
ThiosJ. (1975). Memory for general and specific sentences. Memory and Cognition3, 75–7.
27.
ThorndykeP. (1975). Conceptual complexity and imagery in comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.14, 350–69.
28.
TurnerE. A.RommetveitR. (1968). Focus of attention recall of active and passive sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 543–8.
29.
WaughN. (1970). Associative symmetry and recall latencies: A distinction between learning and performance. Attention and Performance, IIIAmsterdam: North Holland.
30.
WickelgrenW. A. (1979). Cognitive PsychologyEnglewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
31.
WrightP. (1969). Transformation and the understanding of sentences. Language and Speech12, 156–60.
32.
WrightP. (1972). Some observation on how people answer questions about sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 188–95.
