The form of the Information and Selective Counting by ESN(M) Pupils

Abstract

The study springs from views on attentional deficits in retarded performers. Three experiments are reported in which educationally sub-normal (mild) category pupils and average ability pupils matched with them for mental age perform a speeded classification of cards on the basis of an enumeration of a group of items on each card. This group may be the total of the items on the card or a selected part of that total. Interest focuses upon the relationship between performance in the selective situation and the form or structure of the item group. It is argued initially that attentional patterns may be expected to vary in relation to the specific structure of the information available and the way the performer appreciates that structure. The results support this notion. ESN(M) subjects perform in a similar fashion to the matched group, even given selective instructions, when what must be counted is the whole of a vertical linear series of items. However, when what must be counted is in the form of a part of a vertical linear item series, the performance of the ESN(M) group is significantly slower than that of the matched group. In addition the matched group appear more sensitive to discontinuity within the vertical item series while the ESN(M) group may have a less differentiated approach to such information founded mainly on the appreciation of verticality. It is suggested that aspects of information available to performers must be studied in relation to the kind of whole the particular performer takes the information to be. Although retardates do not carry appropriate structural expectations from situation to situation, suitable organisation of information can be appreciated, leading to more successful performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson

Francis

M. R.

Campbell

F. W.

(1976). The dependence of the visual numerosity limit on orientation, colour and grouping in the stimulus. Perception 5, 335–42.

Brainerd

C. J.

(1974). Inducing ordinal and cardinal representations of the first five natural numbers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18, 520–34.

Bryant

P. E.

(1971). Cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, British Medical Bulletin 27, 200–5In Summerfield, A. (Ed.).

Cruickshank

W. M.

Bice

H. V.

Wallen

N. E.

Lynch

K. S.

(1965). Perception and Cerebral Palsy, 2nd edn Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

Druker

J. F.

Hagen

J. W.

(1969). Developmental trends in the processing of task-related and task-irrelevant information. Child Development 40, 371–82.

Erdelyi

M. H.

(1974). A new look at the new look: perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review 81, 1–25.

Fisher

M. A.

Zeaman

(1973). An attention-retention theory of retardate discrimination learning. In Ellis

N. R.

(Ed.), International Review of Research in Mental Retardation. New York: Academic Press vol. 6.

Folkard

(1971). Cognitive Psychology, British Medical Bulletin 27, 227–231Personal communication, p. 230. In O'Connor, N. and Hermelin, B., Cognitive deficits in children. In Summerfield, A. (Ed.).

Garner

W. R.

Felfody

G. L.

(1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology 1, 225–41.

10.

Gwiazda

Brill

Mohindra

Held

(1978). Infant visual acuity and its meridional variation. Vision Research 18, 1557–64.

11.

Hallahan

D. P.

(1975). Distractibility in the learning disabled child. In Cruickshank

W. M.

Hallahan

D. P.

(Eds), Perceptual and Learning Disabilities in Children, vol. 2. Research and Theory. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

12.

Hallahan

D. P.

Kauffman

J. M.

(1978). Exceptional Children Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

13.

Hallahan

D. P.

Kauffman

J. M.

Ball

D. W.

(1973). Selective attention and cognitive function of low achieving and high achieving 6th grade males. Perceptual and Motor Skills 36, 579–83.

14.

Herriot

Green

J. M.

McConkey

(1973). Organization and Memory: A Review of a Project in Subnormality London: Methuen.

15.

Ibbotson

Bryant

P. E.

(1976). The perpendicular error and the vertical effect in children's drawing. Perception 5, 319–26.

16.

James

(1890). The Principles of Psychology New York: Henry Holt and Co. vol. 1, (New York: Dover, 1950).

17.

Kahneman

(1973). Attention and Effort Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

18.

Mageean

(1977). Counting and Capacity in Children University of London Doctoral thesis.

19.

Morton

(1969). Categories of interference: verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology 60, 329–46.

20.

O'Connor

Hermelin

(1962). Speech and Thought in Severe Subnormality Oxford: Pergamon Press.

21.

Pick

A. D.

Christy

M. D.

Frankel

G. W.

(1972). A developmental study of visual selective attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 14, 165–75.

22.

Pick

A. D.

Frankel

G. W.

(1973). A study of strategies of visual attention in children. Developmental Psychology 9, 348–57.

23.

Spitz

H. H.

(1973). The channel capacity of educable retardates. In Routh

D. K.

(Ed.), The Experimental Psychology of Mental Retardation. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

24.

Strutt

G. F.

Anderson

D. R.

Well

A. D.

(1975). A developmental study of the effects of irrelevant information on speeded classification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 20, 127–35.

25.

Winer

B. J.

(1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd edn New York: McGraw-Hill.

26.

Zeaman

House

B. J.

(1963). The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In Ellis

N. R.

(Ed.), Handbook of Mental Deficiency. New York: McGraw-Hill.