An appropriate semantic context has been demonstrated to facilitate word recognition in a variety of paradigms. The present experiment examined the consequences of varying the probability that word pairs presented in a lexical decision task would be related in meaning. Early in the 20-min session, the recent density of semantic relationships between words had little influence on the size of the contextual facilitation effect, but later the influence was marked. The results suggest that the processing facilitation provided by an appropriate semantic context consisted of both a relatively automatic component and a labile strategic component with an influence that was modulated by the recent usefulness of the information provided by semantic context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntosS. J. (1979). Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5, 527–45.
2.
BeckerC. A.KillionT. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3, 389–401.
3.
ClarkH. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior12, 335–59.
4.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review82, 407–28.
5.
CollinsA. M.QuillianM. R. (1970). Facilitating retrieval from semantic memory: the effect of repeating part of an inference. Acta Psychologica33, 304–14.
6.
FischlerI. (1977). Associative facilitation without expectancy in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3, 18–26.
7.
FischlerI.BloomP. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18, 1–20.
8.
MeyerD. E.SchvaneveldtR. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology90, 227–34.
9.
MeyerD. E.SchvaneveldtR. W.RuddyM. D. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In RabbitP.DornicS. (Eds), Attention and Performance V.New York: Academic Press.
10.
MortonJ. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review76, 165–78.
11.
MortonJ. (1970). A functional model for memory. In NormanD. A. (Ed.), Models of Human Memory.New York: Academic Press.
12.
NeelyJ. H. (1976). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes. Memory and Cognition4, 648–54.
13.
NeelyJ. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General106, 226–54.
14.
PalermoD. S.JenkinsJ. J. (1964). Word Association Norms—Grade School Through CollegeMinneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In SolsoR. (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium.Potomac, Md.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
QuillianM. R. (1967). Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some semantic capabilities. Behavioral Science12, 410–30.
17.
SchneiderW.ShiffrinR. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review84, 1–66.
18.
SchvaneveldtR. W.MeyerD. E. (1973). Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory. In KornblumS. (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI.New York: Academic Press.
19.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (1979). Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention. Memory and Cognition7, 77–85.
20.
SwinneyD. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18, 645–59.
21.
TweedyJ. R.LapinskiR. H.SchvaneveldtR. W. (1977). Semantic context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate semantic context. Memory and Cognition5, 84–9.
