Post-Conditioning Devaluation of an Instrumental Reinforcer has no Effect on Extinction Performance

Abstract

The extent to which a representation of the reinforcer controls an instrumental response can be assessed by studying the effect of post-conditioning changes in the reinforcer value. In the first experiment rats were trained to press a lever for sucrose pellets on a variable-interval (VI) schedule. The sucrose was subsequently devalued by pairing with Lithium Chloride (LiCl). This had no effect on lever pressing in extinction, although it profoundly reduced reacquisition responding and consumption. In Experiment II rats were trained to shuttle between the two distinctive chambers of a choice-box, in which lever pressing was reinforced in one chamber by sucrose and in the other chamber by food pellets programmed on independent VI schedules. A LiCl-induced taste-aversion was conditioned to the sucrose, and although this markedly affected reacquisition, extinction responding in the sucrose chamber and chamber preference were unaffected. These results indicate that instrumental performance can be independent of the current value of the reinforcer, and are discussed with reference to stimulus-response theory and second-order Pavlovian conditioning.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archer

Sjoden

P-O.

Nilsson

L-G.

Carter

(1979). Role of exteroceptive background context in taste-aversion conditioning and extinction. Animal Learning and Behavior 7, 17–22.

Garcia

Kovner

Green

K. F.

(1970). Cue properties versus palatability of flavours in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science 20, 313–4.

Grote

F. W.

Jr Brown

R. T.

(1971). Conditioned taste-aversions: Two stimulus tests are more sensitive than one stimulus tests. Behaviour Research Methods and Instrumentation 3, 311–2.

Holland

P. C.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1975a). The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1, 355–63.

Holland

P. C.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1975b). Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 88, 459–69.

Holland

P. C.

Straub

J. J.

(1979). Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 5, 65–78.

Holman

E. W.

(1975). Some conditions for the dissociation of consummatory and instrumental behavior in rats. Learning and Motivation 6, 358–66.

Kriekhaus

E. E.

(1970). “Innate recognition” aids rats in sodium regulation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 73, 117–22.

Kriekhaus

E. E.

Wolf

(1968). Acquisition of sodium by rats: Interaction of innate mechanisms and latent learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 65, 197–201.

10.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1974). The Psychology of Animal Learning New York: Academic Press.

11.

Morrison

G. R.

Collyer

(1974). Taste-mediated conditioned aversion to an exteroceptive stimulus following LiCl poisoning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 80, 51–5.

12.

Pearce

J. M.

Hall

The role of context-reinforcer associations in determining instrumental performance.

Animal Learning and BehaviorIn press.

13.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1973). Effect of US habituation following conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 82, 137–43.

14.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1974). Effect of inflation of the unconditional stimulus value following conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 86, 101–6.

15.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1977). Pavlovian second-order conditioning: Some implications for instrumental behavior. In Davis

Hurwitz

H. M. B.

(Eds), Operant-Pavlovian interactions Hilsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

16.

Rescorla

R. A.

Solomon

R. L.

(1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review 74, 151–82.

17.

Rozeboom

W. W.

(1958). “What is learned?”—An empirical enigma. Psychological Review 65, 22–33.

18.

Trapold

M. A.

Ovrmier

J. B.

(1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. In Black

A. A.

Prokasy

W. F.

(Eds), Classical conditioning. II. Current research and theory New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

19.

Weisinger

R. S.

Woods

S. C.

Skorupski

J. D.

(1970). Sodium deficiency and latent learning. Psychonomic Science 19, 307–8.