Observers’ accuracy in detecting a narrow spatial gap between two brief, luminous rectangles presented successively was determined within a two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. This successive-field task requires iconic memory, because the information (rectangle position) in the two presentations must be combined for successful gap detection. On this task, the effect of varying the duration of the first rectangle was systematically investigated over several target luminance levels and for several ISI conditions between rectangles. At the long ISI conditions (100 and 300 ms), the effects of increasing stimulus duration was to improve performance. However, at the brief ISI condition (20 ms), increasing stimulus duration initially depressed task performance. It was found that, with practice, this initial performance drop largely disappeared, and the beneficial influence of increasing target duration was again obtained. These results are discussed in terms of (a) a proposed retinal locus for the iconic memory involved and (b), at a more general level, the potentially distracting role of changing stimulus dimensions on a task employing transient stimuli as in the present study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllanL. G. (1975). Temporal order psychometric functions based on confidence rating data.Perception and Psychophysics18, 369–72.
2.
BernsteinI. H.FisicaroS. A.FoxJ. A. (1976). Metacontrast suppression and criterion content: A discriminant function analysis.Perception and Psychophysics20, 198–204.
3.
BernsteinI. H.ProctorJ. D.ProctorR. W.ShurmanD. L. (1973). Meta contrast and brightness discrimination.Perception and Psychophysics14, 293–7.
4.
BowenR. W.PolaJ.MatinL. (1974). Visual persistance: Effects of flash luminance, duration, and energy.Vision Research14, 295–303.
5.
BriggsG. G.KinsbourneM. (1972). Visual persistence as measured by reaction time.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology24, 318–25.
6.
BrownJ. L. (1965). Flicker and intermittent stimulation. In GrahamC. H. (Ed.), Vision and Visual PerceptionNew York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
7.
CoheneL. S. (1975). Iconic memory of dot patterns: Preliminary report.Perceptual and Motor Skills41, 167–70.
8.
ColtheartM.LeaC. D.ThompsonK. (1974). In defence of iconic memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology26, 633–41.
9.
DickA. O. (1974). Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms.Perception and Psychophysics16, 575–96.
10.
DilolloV. A. (1977). Temporal characteristics of iconic memory.Nature267, 241–3.
11.
DilolloV. A.WilsonA. E. (1978). Iconic persistence and perceptual moment as determinants of temporary integration in vision.Vision Research18, 1607–10.
12.
DixonN. F.HammondE. J. (1972). The attenuation of visual persistence.British Journal of Psychology63, 243–54.
13.
EfronR. (1970a). Effects of stimulus duration on perceptual onset and offset latencies.Perception and Psychophysics8, 231–4.
14.
EfronR. (1970b). The relationship between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception.Neuropsychologia8, 37–55.
15.
EfronR. (1970c). The minimal duration of a perception.Neuropsychologia8, 57–63.
16.
EriksenC. W.CollinsJ. F. (1967). Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology74, 476–84.
17.
EriksenC. W.CollinsJ. F. (1968). Sensory traces versus the psychological moment in the temporal organization of form.Journal of Experimental Psychology77, 376–80.
18.
ErwinD. E. (1976). Further evidence for two components in visual persistence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2, 191–209.
19.
FisicaroS. A.BernsteinI. H.NarkiewicaP. (1977). Apparent movement and metacontrast suppression: A decisional analysis.Perception and Psychophysics22, 517–25.
20.
GanzL. (1975). Temporal factors in visual perception. In CarteretteE. C.FriedmanM. P. (Eds), Handbook of PerceptionSeeing. New York: Academic PressVol. 5.
21.
GrahamC. H. (1975). Some fundamental data. In GrahamC. H. (Ed.), Vision and Visual PerceptionNew York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
22.
HaberR. N.HershensonM. (1973). The Psychology of Visual PerceptionNew York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
23.
HaberR. N.NathansonL. S. (1968). Post-retinal storage? Some further observations on Park's camel as seen through the eye of a needle.Perception and Psychophysics3, 349–55.
24.
HaberR. N.StandingL. (1969). Direct measures of short-term visual storage.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology21, 43–54.
25.
HaberR. N.StandingL. (1970). Direct estimates of the apparent duration of a flash followed by visual noise.Canadian Journal of Psychology24, 216229.
26.
HogbenJ. H.DilolloV. A. (1974). Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli.Vision Research14, 1059–969.
27.
HogbenJ. H.DilolloV. A. (1976). Practice induced decrement of suppression in metacontrast and apparent motion Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November.
28.
KeeleS. W.ChaseW. G. (1967). Short-term visual storage.Perception and Psychophysics2, 383–6.
29.
LevinsonJ. Z. (1968). Flicker fusion phenomena.Science160, 21–8.
30.
LongG. M. (1978). Iconic memory: The effects of stimulus parameters on short-term visual storage. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Dissertation Abstracts International39, 46196B.
31.
LongG. M.SakittB. (in press). The retinal basis of iconic memory: Eriksen and Collins revisited.American Journal of Psychology.
32.
MatinL.BowenR. W. (1976). Measuring the duration of perception.Perception and Psychophysics20, 66–76.
33.
MeyerG. E.MaguireW. (1977). Spatial frequency and the mediation of short-term visual storage.Science198, 524–5.
34.
NeisserU. (1967). Cognitive PsychologyNew Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
35.
OsakaN. (1977). Perceived brightness as a function of flash duration in the peripheral visual field.Perception and Psychophysics22, 63–9.
36.
PennerM. J. (1975). The perception of offset: A problem of decision criteria.Perception and Psychophysics17, 587–90.
37.
RohrbaughJ. W.EriksenC. W. (1975). Reaction time measurement of temporal integration and organization of form.Perception and Psychophysics17, 53–8.
38.
SakittB. (1975). Locus of short-term visual storage.Science16, 129–40.
SakittB. (1976b). Psychophysical correlates of photoreceptor activity.Vision Research16, 129–40.
41.
SakittB.LongG. M. (1978). Relative rod and cone contributions in iconic storage.Perception and Psychophysics23, 527–36.
42.
SakittB.LongG. M. (1979a). Spare the rod and spoil the icon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5, 19–30.
43.
SakittB.LongG. M. (1979b). Cones determine subjective offset of a stimulus but rods determine total persistence.Vision Research19, 1439–41.
44.
ScharfB.LeftonL. A. (1970). Backward and forward masking as a function of stimulus and task parameters.Journal of Experimental Psychology84, 331–8.
45.
SchillerP. H. (1965). Monoptic and dichoptic visual masking by patterns and flashes.Journal of Experimental Psychology69, 193–9.
46.
SperlingG. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs74, (II, Whole No. 498).
47.
SperlingG. (1967). Successive approximations to a model for short-term memory.Acta Psychologia27, 285–92.
48.
StandingL. G.HaberR. N.CataldoM.SalesB. D. (1969). Two types of short-term visual storage.Perception and Psychophysics5, 193–6.
49.
SternbergS.KnollR. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In KornblumS. (Ed.), Attention and Performance IVNew York: Academic Press.
50.
VenturaJ. (1978). Criteria and practice effects in foveal metacontrast Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, August.
