Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Presentation of a feedback stimulus, a non-aversive event never paired with shock, following an avoidance response has been found to be an effective reinforcer in avoidance learning. Alternative formulations of the feedback effect, one a version of the traditional S-R mechanistic, two-factor theory and the other a cognitive (informational) theory, were evaluated with a view toward determining which type of formulation provides a more viable explanation of avoidance learning. The conclusion reached, however, was that both informational and fear-reduction positions operationalize their critical concepts in the same manner, and to date there are no empirical grounds for distinguishing these different views.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolles

R. C.

(1970). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review 71, 32–48.

Bolles

R. C.

(1971). Species-specific defense reactions. In Brush

F. R.

(Ed.), Aversive Conditioning and Learning New York: Academic Press.

Bolles

R. C.

Grossen

N. E.

(1969). Effects of an informational stimulus on the acquisition of avoidance behavior in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 68, 90–99.

Bolles

R. C.

Grossen

N. E.

(1970). Function of the CS in shuttlebox avoidance learning by rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 70, 165–69.

Bower

Starr

Lazarovitz

(1965). Amount of response-produced change in the CS and avoidance learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 59, 13–17.

Cicala

G. A.

Owen

J. W.

(1976). Warning signal termination and a feedback signal may not serve the same function. Learning and Motivation 7, 356–67.

D'Amato

M. R.

Fazzaro

Etkin

(1968). Anticipatory responding and avoidance discrimination as factors in avoidance learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77, 41–7.

Fowler

(1967). Satiation and curiosity. In Spence

K. W.

Spence

J. T.

(Eds), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation New York: Academic Press Vol. 1.

Galvani

P. F.

Twitty

M. T.

(1978). Effects of intertrial interval and exteroceptive feedback duration on discriminative avoidance acquisition in the gerbil. Animal Learning and Behavior 6, 166–73.

10.

Keehn

J. D.

Nakkash

(1959). Effect of a signal contingent upon an avoidance response. Nature (London) 184, 566–8.

11.

Kish

G. B.

(1966). Studies of sensory reinforcement. In Hoxig

W. K.

(Ed.), Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

12.

Morris

R. G. M.

(1975). Preconditioning of reinforcing properties to an exteroceptive feedback stimulus. Learning and Motivation 6, 289–98.

13.

Mowrer

O. H.

(1947). On the dual nature of learning—a reinterpretation of “conditioning” and “problem solving”. Harvard Educational Review 17, 102–48.

14.

Ritchie

B. F.

(1951). Can reinforcement theory account for avoidance? Psychological Review 58, 382–6.

15.

Weisman

R. G.

Litner

J. S.

(1972). The role of Pavlovian events in avoidance training. In Boakes

R. A.

Halliday

M. S.

(Eds), Inhibition and Learning New York: Academic Press.

Feedback in Discriminative Avoidance Learning: Mechanistic versus Cognitive Views

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References